Literature DB >> 26171763

Influence of maternal body mass index on sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery.

Hüseyin Aksoy1, Ülkü Aksoy2, Özge İdem Karadağ3, Burak Yücel3, Turgut Aydın3, Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit4.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the possible effect of maternal obesity on the accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in the third-trimester shortly before induction of labor and to compare the accuracy of the estimation between normal weight, overweight, and class I, class II and class III obese groups.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of singleton pregnancies with sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery. Women were classified according to current body mass index (BMI) into five categories: normal (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2), n = 41), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2), n = 44), obese class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2), n = 40), obese class II (BMI, 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2), n = 38) and obese class III (BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m(2), n = 35). The estimated fetal weight was compared with the actual birthweight, and the difference between them was recorded as the error.
RESULTS: Mean absolute error of sonographic fetal weight estimation was 106.97 ± 80.83 g, 198.88 ± 124.32 g, 248.82 ± 122.75 g, 308.31 ± 138.97 g and 446.00 ± 151.46 g in the normal, overweight, obese class I, obese class II, and obese class III groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The corresponding mean absolute percentage errors were 3.51 ± 2.76, 6.37 ± 3.91, 7.93 ± 4.81, 9.87 ± 4.32 and 14.06 ± 5.83 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal obesity decreases the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of sonographic fetal weight estimation, especially in obese patients.
© 2015 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; fetal weight; obesity; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171763     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Errors of 35 Weight Estimation Formulae in a Standard Collective.

Authors:  M Hoopmann; K O Kagan; A Sauter; H Abele; P Wagner
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight in New Zealand.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Cooper; Gregory P Tarr; Joanne Kelly; Colleen J Bergin
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation in full-term singleton pregnant women.

Authors:  Emre Erdem Tas; Edip Alptug Kir; Gamze Yilmaz; Ayse Filiz Yavuz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Adam Peschel; Michael Bolz; Änne Glass; Bernd Gerber
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Percent error of ultrasound examination to estimate fetal weight at term in different categories of birth weight with focus on maternal diabetes and obesity.

Authors:  Luisa Dittkrist; Julia Vetterlein; Wolfgang Henrich; Babett Ramsauer; Dietmar Schlembach; Michael Abou-Dakn; Ulrich Gembruch; Ralf L Schild; Antonia Duewal; Ute M Schaefer-Graf
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.