Literature DB >> 26171762

Effectiveness of China's National Forest Protection Program and nature reserves.

Guopeng Ren1, Stephen S Young2, Lin Wang1, Wei Wang3, Yongcheng Long4, Ruidong Wu5, Junsheng Li3, Jianguo Zhu1, Douglas W Yu1,6.   

Abstract

There is profound interest in knowing the degree to which China's institutions are capable of protecting its natural forests and biodiversity in the face of economic and political change. China's 2 most important forest-protection policies are its National Forest Protection Program (NFPP) and its national-level nature reserves (NNRs). The NFPP was implemented in 2000 in response to deforestation-caused flooding. We undertook the first national, quantitative assessment of the NFPP and NNRs to examine whether the NFPP achieved its deforestation-reduction target and whether the NNRs deter deforestation altogether. We used MODIS data to estimate forest cover and loss across mainland China (2000-2010). We also assembled the first-ever polygon dataset for China's forested NNRs (n = 237, 74,030 km(2) in 2000) and used both conventional and covariate-matching approaches to compare deforestation rates inside and outside NNRs (2000-2010). In 2000, 1.765 million km(2) or 18.7% of mainland China was forested (12.3% with canopy cover of ≥70%)) or woodland (6.4% with canopy cover <70% and tree plus shrub cover ≥40%). By 2010, 480,203 km(2) of forest and woodland had been lost, an annual deforestation rate of 2.7%. Forest-only loss was 127,473 km(2) (1.05% annually). In the NFPP provinces, the forest-only loss rate was 0.62%, which was 3.3 times lower than in the non-NFPP provinces. Moreover, the Landsat data suggest that these loss rates are overestimates due to large MODIS pixel size. Thus, China appears to have achieved, and even exceeded, its target of reducing deforestation to 1.1% annually in the NFPP provinces. About two-thirds of China's NNRs were effective in protecting forest cover (prevented loss 4073 km(2) unmatched approach; 3148 km(2) matched approach), and within-NNR deforestation rates were higher in provinces with higher overall deforestation. Our results indicate that China's existing institutions can protect domestic forest cover.
© 2015 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  MOD13Q1; avoided deforestation; biodiversity conservation; conservación de la biodiversidad; correspondencia de covarianza; covariate matching; deforestación evitada; gobierno; governance; national parks; parques nacionales; protected areas; áreas protegidas

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171762     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  12 in total

1.  Insights into plant biodiversity conservation in large river valleys in China: A spatial analysis of species and phylogenetic diversity.

Authors:  Xudong Yang; Fei Qin; Tiantian Xue; Changying Xia; Sudhindra R Gadagkar; Shengxiang Yu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Human population and socioeconomic modulators of conservation performance in 788 Amazonian and Atlantic Forest reserves.

Authors:  Ana Alice B de Marques; Mauricio Schneider; Carlos A Peres
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Recovery of woody plant species richness in secondary forests in China: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Liu; Xuehua Liu; Andrew Skidmore; Claude Garcia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  China's fight to halt tree cover loss.

Authors:  Antje Ahrends; Peter M Hollingsworth; Philip Beckschäfer; Huafang Chen; Robert J Zomer; Lubiao Zhang; Mingcheng Wang; Jianchu Xu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Main ecological drivers of woody plant species richness recovery in secondary forests in China.

Authors:  Xiaofei Liu; John Garcia-Ulloa; Tina Cornioley; Xuehua Liu; Zhiheng Wang; Claude Garcia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Zhifeng Zhang; Yuping Tang; Hongyi Pan; Caiyi Yao; Tianyi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world's largest reforestation programme.

Authors:  Fangyuan Hua; Xiaoyang Wang; Xinlei Zheng; Brendan Fisher; Lin Wang; Jianguo Zhu; Ya Tang; Douglas W Yu; David S Wilcove
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  A road for a promising future for China's primates: The potential for restoration.

Authors:  Colin A Chapman
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-03-09

9.  Adaptation of global land use and management intensity to changes in climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Peter Alexander; Sam Rabin; Peter Anthoni; Roslyn Henry; Thomas A M Pugh; Mark D A Rounsevell; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA.

Authors:  Yinqiu Ji; Christopher C M Baker; Viorel D Popescu; Jiaxin Wang; Chunying Wu; Zhengyang Wang; Yuanheng Li; Lin Wang; Chaolang Hua; Zhongxing Yang; Chunyan Yang; Charles C Y Xu; Alex Diana; Qingzhong Wen; Naomi E Pierce; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.