Literature DB >> 26171566

Microclimate is an independent risk factor for the development of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in the park-bench position: A prospective observational study.

Mine Yoshimura1, Gojiro Nakagami1, Shinji Iizaka1, Mikako Yoshida2, Yoko Uehata1, Michihiro Kohno3, Yusuke Kasuya4, Tomoko Mae5, Takashi Yamasaki5, Hiromi Sanada1.   

Abstract

Preventing pressure ulcers is important in patients undergoing procedures in the park-bench position. We hypothesized that the microclimate around the skin is a significant risk factor for developing pressure ulcers. This research continuously assessed factors of the microclimate in terms of skin temperature and perspiration as well as the interface pressure in order to determine whether the microclimate is an independent risk factor for the development of park-bench position-related pressure ulcers (PBP-PUs). A prospective observational study was conducted among patients undergoing elective surgery in the park-bench position at a general hospital in the metropolitan area of Japan between April and November 2014. Factors of the microclimate, including skin temperature and perspiration, in addition to the interface pressure were continuously measured throughout surgery. Twenty-nine patients were analyzed (mean age 44.4 ± 13.2 years, male 44.8%). Of these 29 patients, seven (24.1%) developed Category I PBP-PUs. The change in skin temperature from baseline to the end of surgery (2.7 ± 0.3 °C vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 °C) and the average peak pressure (119.1 ± 36.8 mmHg vs. 94.5 ± 23.1 mmHg) were significantly higher in the patients with PBP-PUs than in those without PBP-PUs. There were no significant differences in the amount of perspiration between the two groups. A hierarchical logistic regression analysis showed that the change in skin temperature was significantly related to the development of PBP-PUs (unit = 0.1 °C: odds ratio 1.44, 95% confidential interval 1.09-2.33) when adjusted for the average peak pressure and length of surgery. Our results suggest that a change in skin temperature toward a higher value is an independent risk factor for the development of PBP-PUs. Proper intraoperative management of skin temperature may therefore be a promising candidate as a preventive method against PBP-PU development.
© 2015 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interface pressure; neurosurgery; perioperative nursing; perspiration; skin temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171566     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  5 in total

1.  Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Sue Creehan; Joyce Black
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Soft silicone foam dressing is more effective than polyurethane film dressing for preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in spinal surgery patients: the Border Operating room Spinal Surgery (BOSS) trial in Japan.

Authors:  Mine Yoshimura; Norihiko Ohura; Junko Tanaka; Shoichi Ichimura; Yusuke Kasuya; Oruto Hotta; Yu Kagaya; Takuya Sekiyama; Mitsuko Tannba; Nao Suzuki
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  A prediction tool for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score.

Authors:  Fazila Aloweni; Shin Yuh Ang; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Nurliyana Agus; Patricia Yong; Meh Meh Goh; Lisa Tucker-Kellogg; Rick Chai Soh
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The Effects of Skin Temperature Changes on the Integrity of Skin Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tiziana Mifsud; Chiara Modestini; Anabelle Mizzi; Owen Falzon; Kevin Cassar; Stephen Mizzi
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Dressing interventions to heal pressure ulcers: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Geng; Yali Zhao; Zheyuan Wang; Mancai Wang; Zhihong Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.