Literature DB >> 26171414

Prostate cancer diagnosis: the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomography.

Berrend G Muller1, Daniel M de Bruin2, Willemien van den Bos1, Martin J Brandt3, Juliette F Velu3, Mieke T J Bus1, Dirk J Faber3, Dilara Savci4, Patricia J Zondervan1, Theo M de Reijke1, Pilar Laguna Pes1, Jean de la Rosette1, Ton G van Leeuwen3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional analysis of OCT data along the full pullback trajectory of the OCT measurement in the prostate, correlated with pathology. OCT images were recorded using a commercially available C7-XR™ OCT Intravascular Imaging System interfaced to a C7 Dragonfly™ intravascular 0.9-mm-diameter imaging probe. A computer program was constructed for automated image attenuation analysis. First, calibration of the OCT system for both the point spread function and the system roll-off was achieved by measurement of the OCT signal attenuation from an extremely weakly scattering medium (Intralipid® 0.0005 volume%). Second, the data were arranged in 31 radial wedges (pie slices) per circular segments consisting of 16 A-scans per wedge and 5 axial B-scans, resulting in an average A-scan per wedge. Third, the decay of the OCT signal is analyzed over 50 pixels ([Formula: see text]) in depth, starting from the first found maximum data point. Fourth, for visualization, the data were grouped with a corresponding color representing a specific [Formula: see text] range according to their attenuation coefficient. Finally, the analyses were compared to histopathology. To ensure that each single use sterile imaging probe is comparable to the measurements of the other imaging probes, the probe-to-probe variations were analyzed by measuring attenuation coefficients of 0.03, 6.5, 11.4, 17, and 22.7 volume% Intralipid®. Experiments were repeated five times per probe for four probes. Inter- and intraprobe variation in the measured attenuation of Intralipid samples with scattering properties similar to that of the prostate was [Formula: see text] of the mean values. Mean attenuation coefficients in the prostate were [Formula: see text] for parts of the tissue that were classified as benign (SD: [Formula: see text], minimum: [Formula: see text], maximum: [Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] for parts of tissue that were classified as malignant (SD: [Formula: see text], minimum: [Formula: see text], maximum: [Formula: see text]). In benign areas, the tissue looked homogeneous, whereas in malignant areas, small glandular structures were seen. However, not all areas in which a high attenuation coefficient became apparent corresponded to areas of prostate cancer. This paper describes the first in-tissue needle-based OCT imaging and three-dimensional optical attenuation analysis of prostate tissue that indicates a correlation with pathology. Fully automated attenuation coefficient analysis was performed at 1300 nm over the full pullback. Correlation with pathology was achieved by coregistration of three-dimensional (3-D) OCT attenuation maps with 3-D pathology of the prostate. This may contribute to the current challenge of prostate imaging and the rising interest in focal therapy for reduction of side effects occurring with current therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; imaging; optical coherence tomography; prostate cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171414      PMCID: PMC4498002          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.3.037501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  44 in total

1.  Scattering attenuation microscopy of oral epithelial dysplasia.

Authors:  Pete H Tomlins; Oluyori Adegun; Eleni Hagi-Pavli; Kim Piper; Dan Bader; Farida Fortune
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Segmentation of optical coherence tomography images for differentiation of the cavernous nerves from the prostate gland.

Authors:  Shahab Chitchian; Thomas P Weldon; Nathaniel M Fried
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography evaluation of drug-eluting stents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aristotelis C Papayannis; Daisha Cipher; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Optical coherence tomography in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Ronni Wessels; Daniel M de Bruin; Dirk J Faber; Hester H van Boven; Andrew D Vincent; Ton G van Leeuwen; Marc van Beurden; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Structural markers observed with endoscopic 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography correlating with Barrett's esophagus radiofrequency ablation treatment response (with videos).

Authors:  Tsung-Han Tsai; Chao Zhou; Yuankai K Tao; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman O Ahsen; Marisa Figueiredo; Tejas Kirtane; Desmond C Adler; Joseph M Schmitt; Qin Huang; James G Fujimoto; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty preserves dorsal nerves in congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Dix P Poppas; Ariella A Hochsztein; Rebecca N Baergen; Emily Loyd; Jie Chen; Diane Felsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Winston Barzell
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  10 in total

1.  Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-04-10

2.  Intraoperative Optical Biopsy during Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Confocal Endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Aristeo Lopez; Dimitar V Zlatev; Kathleen E Mach; Daniel Bui; Jen-Jane Liu; Robert V Rouse; Theodore Harris; John T Leppert; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Ex-vivo study in nephroureterectomy specimens defining the role of 3-D upper urinary tract visualization using optical coherence tomography and endoluminal ultrasound.

Authors:  Mieke T J Bus; Paul Cernohorsky; Daniel M de Bruin; Sybren L Meijer; Geert J Streekstra; Dirk J Faber; Guido M Kamphuis; Patricia J Zondervan; Marcel van Herk; Maria P Laguna Pes; Maik J Grundeken; Martin J Brandt; Theo M de Reijke; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-12

4.  Customized Tool for the Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography in Differentiation of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  B G Muller; A Swaan; D M de Bruin; W van den Bos; A W Schreurs; D J Faber; E C H Zwartkruis; L Rozendaal; A N Vis; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; R J A van Moorselaar; T G van Leeuwen; J J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-07

5.  Clinical translation of handheld optical coherence tomography: practical considerations and recent advancements.

Authors:  Guillermo L Monroy; Jungeun Won; Darold R Spillman; Roshan Dsouza; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Needle-Based, In Vivo Feasibility Study Protocol (IDEAL Phase 2A).

Authors:  Abel Swaan; Christophe K Mannaerts; Matthijs Jv Scheltema; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; Ton G van Leeuwen; Theo M de Reijke; Daniel Martijn de Bruin
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  Novel real-time optical imaging modalities for the detection of neoplastic lesions in urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Qi Jia Ong; Daniel Elson; Erik Mayer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Spatio-temporal deep learning models for tip force estimation during needle insertion.

Authors:  Nils Gessert; Torben Priegnitz; Thore Saathoff; Sven-Thomas Antoni; David Meyer; Moritz Franz Hamann; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Christoph Otte; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show.

Authors:  Ilaria Jansen; Marit Lucas; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Sybren L Meijer; Henk A Marquering; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Parametric imaging of attenuation by optical coherence tomography: review of models, methods, and clinical translation.

Authors:  Peijun Gong; Mitra Almasian; Gijs van Soest; Daniel de Bruin; Ton van Leeuwen; David Sampson; Dirk Faber
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.170

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.