Literature DB >> 26171371

Introducing a Novel Multi-Phase Method for Effective Screening of the Individuals Diagnosed with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.

Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi1, Faroogh Khademi2, Seyed Alireza Mortazavi2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26171371      PMCID: PMC4499100     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Here we introduce a novel multi-phase method for effective screening of the patients diagnosed with Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). EHS is a phenomenon usually characterized by non-specific symptoms such as redness, tingling, burning sensations, fatigue, tiredness, concentration difficulties, dizziness, nausea, heart palpitation and digestive disturbances after exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). EHS is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms, which afflicted individuals attribute to exposure to EMF. The symptoms most commonly experienced include dermatological symptoms as well as neurasthenic and vegetative symptoms. The collection of symptoms is not part of any recognized syndrome. World Health Organization (WHO) believes that EHS reveals as a variety of non-specific symptoms, which differs among different individuals. WHO suggests that EHS individuals, health-care professionals and employers should be informed about possible adverse health effects of exposure to EMF by the governments (1). Now there is a debate over whether EHS is unrelated to the presence of electromagnetic fields and to date the etiology of EHS is not clearly understood. The population based surveys performed over the past years have estimated the prevalence of EHS in some cities/countries; e.g. 1.5% in Sweden (2), 5% in Switzerland (3), 3.2% in California (4), 3.5% in Austria (5), 4% in the UK (6), and an extraordinary rate of 13.3% in Taiwan (7). It is hypothesized that ethnicities may play a basic role in determining the EHS risk (4). Some studies have shown that the avoidance of electromagnetic fields can help in full or partial recovery (removed or lessened symptoms) in a large proportion of EHS persons (8). However, it is found interestingly that individuals with psychiatric problems are more likely to report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (9). We have previously published reports on the health effects of exposure to different sources of electromagnetic fields such as mobile phones and their base stations, mobile phone jammers, laptop computers, radars, dentistry cavitrons and MRI (10–12). For introducing a method for screening of the patients diagnosed with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, we used a calibrated ICU monitoring system for recording the patient’s biological parameters such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, oral and peripheral temperature, heartbeat and respiration. Our method is composed of six consecutive phases; I: patient was exposed to mobile phone microwave radiations for 10 minutes. II: sham exposure for 10 minutes. III: same as phase I but the patient was informed that the mobile phone was on (in the talk mode). Phase IV, the patient was sham exposed and was informed that the mobile phone was switched off. V: same as phase I but the patient was given incorrect information (he/she was told that the mobile phone was switched off). VI: same as phase II but the patient was given incorrect information (he was told that the mobile phone was on). In each phase, patients were asked if they could feel the presence of electromagnetic fields. Our preliminary results show that EHS patients cannot recognize real and sham exposures in different phases of the experiment. Furthermore, monitoring of the patient’s biological parameters in each phase could not show statistically significant differences between the means of biological parameters in real exposure and sham exposure phases. Altogether, our preliminary findings confirm that under blind conditions, exposure to EMFs cannot trigger any subjective symptoms. Based on the findings of our multi-phase method, it can be hypothesized that neurological symptoms such as headache in EHS patients is not caused by the presence of electromagnetic fields. These findings lead us to this conclusion that psychological factors possibly play an important role in electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
  11 in total

1.  The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  Nadja Schreier; Anke Huss; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2006

2.  Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M S Rouintan; S Taeb; N Dehghan; A A Ghaffarpanah; Z Sadeghi; F Ghafouri
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.396

3.  Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire.

Authors:  Stacy Eltiti; Denise Wallace; Konstantina Zougkou; Riccardo Russo; Stephen Joseph; Paul Rasor; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.010

4.  Prevalence and psychiatric comorbidity of self-reported electromagnetic field sensitivity in Taiwan: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mei-Chih Meg Tseng; Yi-Ping Lin; Tsun-Jen Cheng
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Lena Hillert; Niklas Berglind; Bengt B Arnetz; Tom Bellander
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Risks perception of electromagnetic fields in Taiwan: the influence of psychopathology and the degree of sensitivity to electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Mei-Chih Meg Tseng; Yi-Ping Lin; Fu-Chang Hu; Tsun-Jen Cheng
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: Symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study.

Authors:  M Hagström; J Auranen; R Ekman
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2013-04-01

Review 8.  Looking at the other side of the coin: the search for possible biopositive cognitive effects of the exposure to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone radiofrequency radiation.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Reza Mortazavi; Ali Tavakkoli-Golpayegani; Masoud Haghani; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-04-26

9.  Sensitivity to electricity--temporal changes in Austria.

Authors:  Joerg Schröttner; Norbert Leitgeb
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California.

Authors:  Patrick Levallois; Raymond Neutra; Geraldine Lee; Lilia Hristova
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.