| Literature DB >> 26170013 |
Omid Maghsoudi1, Seyed Hesamoddin Mirjalili2, Mojtaba Dolatabadi2, Mostafa Fallah Joshaghani3, Mojtaba Zarea4, Emad Yahaghi5, Aram Mokarizadeh6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is known as a primary indicator of acute and chronic renal and can be effective in chronic kidney injury (CKI) with kidney tumors cisplatin (CP) chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum and urinary biomarker including NGAL (sNGAL and uNGAL) in canine with solid renal tumors who suffered from cisplatin after short and long-term chemotherapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26170013 PMCID: PMC4501214 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-015-0338-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Clinical signs after administration of cisplatin in during study period
| Study Groups | Case no | Reducing drinking | Reduce eating | Changes in behavior and mobility | Dehydration | Nausea | Mouth ulcers | Mortality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 1 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | |
| 3 | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | |
| 4 | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | |
| 6 | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | |
| 7 | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | |
| 8 | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | |
| 9 | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | |
| Control | 10 | + | + | + | - | - | + | - |
| 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Median workup results of NGAL concentration (sNGA and uNGAL) after cisplatin chemotherapy in during treatment periods
| Variables | Day 0 | Day 1 | Day5 | Day9 | Day13 | Day17 | Day21 | Day25 | Day29 | P* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sNGAL level in treated group | 65.12 ± 6.73 | 68.23 ± 12.29 | 76.71 ± 18.56 | 96.64 ± 22.81 | 115.07 ± 21.01 | 134.20 ± 5.71 | 146 ± 6.21 | 150 ± 19.54 | 306.21 ± 25.47 |
|
| sNGAL level in Control | 62 ± 10.74 | 61.53 ± 4.67 | 68.78 ± 8.23 | 73.32 ± 10..71 | 70.45 ± 10.58 | 81 ± 20.10 | 73.76 ± 10.32 | 78.37 ± 18.43 | 74.53 ± 16.43 |
|
| uNGAL level in treated group | 47.64 ± 3.25 | 49.58 ± 314.35 | 90.83 ± 32.41 | 106.92 ± 37.54 | 127.41 ± 16.83 | 129.27 ± 27.86 | 163 ± 42.46 | 185.85 ± 20.12 | 386 ± 62.54 |
|
| uNGAL level in Control | 49 ± 6.47 | 48.72 ± 22.61 | 46 ± 1.73 | 50 ± 9.16 | 53 ± 9.82 | 47.23 ± 15.46 | 40.54 ± 7.43 | 52.26 ± 12.33 | 51.34 ± 14.53 |
|
Differences were considered significant when P <0.05
Fig. 1Median workup results of sNGAL after cisplatin chemotherapy in canine during treatment periods
Fig. 2Median workup results of uNGAL after cisplatin chemotherapy in during treatment periods