Joanne Ngeow1, Chang Liu1, Ke Zhou1, Kevin D Frick1, David B Matchar1, Charis Eng2. 1. Joanne Ngeow, Charis Eng, Cleveland Clinic; Charis Eng, Case Western Reserve University and School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Joanne Ngeow, National Cancer Centre; Joanne Ngeow, Chang Liu, Ke Zhou, David B. Matchar, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; and Kevin D. Frick, The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD. 2. Joanne Ngeow, Charis Eng, Cleveland Clinic; Charis Eng, Case Western Reserve University and School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Joanne Ngeow, National Cancer Centre; Joanne Ngeow, Chang Liu, Ke Zhou, David B. Matchar, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; and Kevin D. Frick, The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD engc@ccf.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cowden syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by benign and malignant tumors. One-quarter of patients who are diagnosed with CS have pathogenic germline PTEN mutations, which increase the risk of the development of breast, thyroid, uterine, renal, and other cancers. PTEN testing and regular, intensive cancer surveillance allow for early detection and treatment of these cancers for mutation-positive patients and their relatives. Individual CS-related features, however, occur commonly in the general population, making it challenging for clinicians to identify CS-like patients to offer PTEN testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We calculated the cost per mutation detected and analyzed the cost-effectiveness of performing selected PTEN testing among CS-like patients using a semi-quantitative score (the PTEN Cleveland Clinic [CC] score) compared with existing diagnostic criteria. In our model, first-degree relatives of the patients with detected PTEN mutations are offered PTEN testing. All individuals with detected PTEN mutations are offered cancer surveillance. RESULTS: CC score at a threshold of 15 (CC15) costs from $3,720 to $4,573 to detect one PTEN mutation, which is the most inexpensive among the different strategies. At base-case, CC10 is the most cost-effective strategy for female patients who are younger than 40 years, and CC15 is the most cost-effective strategy for female patients who are between 40 and 60 years of age and male patients of all ages. In sensitivity analyses, CC15 is robustly the most cost-effective strategy for probands who are younger than 60 years. CONCLUSION: Use of the CC score as a clinical risk calculator is a cost-effective prescreening method to identify CS-like patients for PTEN germline testing.
PURPOSE:Cowden syndrome (CS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by benign and malignant tumors. One-quarter of patients who are diagnosed with CS have pathogenic germline PTEN mutations, which increase the risk of the development of breast, thyroid, uterine, renal, and other cancers. PTEN testing and regular, intensive cancer surveillance allow for early detection and treatment of these cancers for mutation-positive patients and their relatives. Individual CS-related features, however, occur commonly in the general population, making it challenging for clinicians to identify CS-like patients to offer PTEN testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We calculated the cost per mutation detected and analyzed the cost-effectiveness of performing selected PTEN testing among CS-like patients using a semi-quantitative score (the PTEN Cleveland Clinic [CC] score) compared with existing diagnostic criteria. In our model, first-degree relatives of the patients with detected PTEN mutations are offered PTEN testing. All individuals with detected PTEN mutations are offered cancer surveillance. RESULTS: CC score at a threshold of 15 (CC15) costs from $3,720 to $4,573 to detect one PTEN mutation, which is the most inexpensive among the different strategies. At base-case, CC10 is the most cost-effective strategy for female patients who are younger than 40 years, and CC15 is the most cost-effective strategy for female patients who are between 40 and 60 years of age and male patients of all ages. In sensitivity analyses, CC15 is robustly the most cost-effective strategy for probands who are younger than 60 years. CONCLUSION: Use of the CC score as a clinical risk calculator is a cost-effective prescreening method to identify CS-like patients for PTEN germline testing.
Authors: Tuan A Dinh; Benjamin I Rosner; James C Atwood; C Richard Boland; Sapna Syngal; Hans F A Vasen; Stephen B Gruber; Randall W Burt Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2010-11-18
Authors: Flavia Foca; Silvia Mancini; Lauro Bucchi; Donella Puliti; Marco Zappa; Carlo Naldoni; Fabio Falcini; Maria L Gambino; Silvano Piffer; Maria E Sanoja Gonzalez; Fabrizio Stracci; Manuel Zorzi; Eugenio Paci Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Judith A Hobert; Rebecca Embacher; Jessica L Mester; Thomas W Frazier; Charis Eng Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Frank van Hees; J Dik F Habbema; Reinier G Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mev Dominguez-Valentin; Sigve Nakken; Hélène Tubeuf; Daniel Vodak; Per Olaf Ekstrøm; Anke M Nissen; Monika Morak; Elke Holinski-Feder; Alexandra Martins; Pål Møller; Eivind Hovig Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Karl Johnson; Katherine W Saylor; Isabella Guynn; Karen Hicklin; Jonathan S Berg; Kristen Hassmiller Lich Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Courtney D DiNardo; Sarah A Bannon; Mark Routbort; Anna Franklin; Maureen Mork; Mary Armanios; Emily M Mace; Jordan S Orange; Meselle Jeff-Eke; Jane E Churpek; Koichi Takahashi; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Steve Kornblau; Alison Bertuch; Hannah Cheung; Kapil Bhalla; Andrew Futreal; Lucy A Godley; Keyur P Patel Journal: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Date: 2016-04-27
Authors: Kalatu R Davies; Abenaa M Brewster; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker; Melissa A Crosby; Susan K Peterson; Yu Shen; Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 6.466