Literature DB >> 2616957

Factors affecting preparation of chromosomes for scanning electron microscopy using osmium impregnation.

A T Sumner1, A Ross.   

Abstract

Osmium impregnation techniques have become useful for imparting conductivity to tissue specimens for SEM, thereby avoiding coating with gold or other metals. Such techniques have been developed to produce aesthetically pleasing images of mammalian (particularly human) chromosomes prepared by standard cytogenetical methods which use methanol-acetic acid fixation. The present study was designed: (1) to examine changes in the appearance of chromosomes as a result of preparation by osmium impregnation techniques; (2) to assess the function and importance of the various stages of chromosome preparation; and (3) to identify the chemical groups responsible for osmium binding. Methanol-acetic acid fixed chromosomes are known to have lost many proteins during fixation, and appear to be flattened down on the substrate. Osmium impregnation swells these flattened chromosomes to a variable extent, but the result is inevitably an artefact, albeit a useful one, and not a true representation of the chromosome in vivo. The size of chromatin fibres, for example, is the consequence of the degree of protein extraction during fixation, the loss of material during pre-treatments (e.g. trypsin), and the amount of osmium uptake during impregnation. Trypsin pre-treatment removes a surface coating of protein from the chromosomes as well as exposing chemical groups which can react with osmium. The principal reactive site appears to be amino groups, which bind glutaraldehyde, which in turn binds thiocarbohydrazide, to which the osmium becomes attached. Pre-treatments other than trypsin can be used to extract chromosomal material and to reveal different aspects of chromosome structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2616957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning Microsc Suppl        ISSN: 0892-953X


  4 in total

1.  Changes in chromosomal ultrastructure during the cell cycle.

Authors:  R Martin; W Busch; R G Herrmann; G Wanner
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Atomic force microscopy of plant chromosomes.

Authors:  M Winfield; T J McMaster; A Karp; M J Miles
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  High resolution detection of uncoated metaphase chromosomes by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; E Rizzi; M Falconi; A Galanzi; B Baratta; G Lattanzi; M Vitale; G Mazzotti; L Manzoli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Scanning electron microscopy of mammalian chromosomes from prophase to telophase.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.316

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.