INTRODUCTION:Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) has been shown to be efficacious for chronic tic disorders (CTDs), but utilization is limited by a lack of treatment providers and perceived financial and time burden of commuting to treatment. A promising alternative to in-person delivery is voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), allowing for remote, real-time treatment delivery to patients' homes. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VoIP for CTDs. Therefore, the present study examined the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of VoIP-delivered CBIT (CBIT-VoIP). METHODS:Twenty youth (8-16 years) with CTDs participated in a randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot trial of CBIT-VoIP. The main outcome was pre- to post-treatment change in clinician-rated tic severity (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale). The secondary outcome was clinical responder rate (Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale), assessed using ratings of 'very much improved' or 'much improved' indicating positive treatment response. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses with the last observation carried forward were performed. At post-treatment (10-weeks), significantly greater reductions in clinician-rated, (F(1,18) = 3.05, p < 0.05, partial η(2 )= 0.15), and parent-reported tic severity, (F(1,18) = 6.37, p < 0.05, partial η(2 )= 0.26) were found in CBIT-VoIP relative to waitlist. One-third (n = 4) of those in CBIT-VoIP were considered treatment responders. Treatment satisfaction and therapeutic alliance were high. DISCUSSION: CBIT can be delivered via VoIP with high patient satisfaction, using accessible, low-cost equipment. CBIT-VoIP was generally feasible to implement, with some audio and visual challenges. Modifications to enhance treatment delivery are suggested.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) has been shown to be efficacious for chronic tic disorders (CTDs), but utilization is limited by a lack of treatment providers and perceived financial and time burden of commuting to treatment. A promising alternative to in-person delivery is voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), allowing for remote, real-time treatment delivery to patients' homes. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VoIP for CTDs. Therefore, the present study examined the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of VoIP-delivered CBIT (CBIT-VoIP). METHODS: Twenty youth (8-16 years) with CTDs participated in a randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot trial of CBIT-VoIP. The main outcome was pre- to post-treatment change in clinician-rated tic severity (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale). The secondary outcome was clinical responder rate (Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale), assessed using ratings of 'very much improved' or 'much improved' indicating positive treatment response. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses with the last observation carried forward were performed. At post-treatment (10-weeks), significantly greater reductions in clinician-rated, (F(1,18) = 3.05, p < 0.05, partial η(2 )= 0.15), and parent-reported tic severity, (F(1,18) = 6.37, p < 0.05, partial η(2 )= 0.26) were found in CBIT-VoIP relative to waitlist. One-third (n = 4) of those in CBIT-VoIP were considered treatment responders. Treatment satisfaction and therapeutic alliance were high. DISCUSSION: CBIT can be delivered via VoIP with high patient satisfaction, using accessible, low-cost equipment. CBIT-VoIP was generally feasible to implement, with some audio and visual challenges. Modifications to enhance treatment delivery are suggested.
Authors: Thomas Steeves; B Duncan McKinlay; Daniel Gorman; Lori Billinghurst; Lundy Day; Alan Carroll; Yves Dion; Asif Doja; Sandra Luscombe; Paul Sandor; Tamara Pringsheim Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Sabine Wilhelm; Alan L Peterson; John Piacentini; Douglas W Woods; Thilo Deckersbach; Denis G Sukhodolsky; Susanna Chang; Haibei Liu; James Dziura; John T Walkup; Lawrence Scahill Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-08
Authors: H Ben-Pazi; P Browne; P Chan; E Cubo; M Guttman; A Hassan; J Hatcher-Martin; Z Mari; E Moukheiber; N U Okubadejo; A Shalash Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Joseph F McGuire; John Piacentini; Eric A Storch; Tanya K Murphy; Emily J Ricketts; Douglas W Woods; John W Walkup; Alan L Peterson; Sabine Wilhelm; Adam B Lewin; James T McCracken; James F Leckman; Lawrence Scahill Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joseph F McGuire; Emily J Ricketts; John Piacentini; Tanya K Murphy; Eric A Storch; Adam B Lewin Journal: Curr Dev Disord Rep Date: 2015-09-14
Authors: Ryan K McBain; Jessica L Sousa; Adam J Rose; Sangita M Baxi; Laura J Faherty; Caroline Taplin; Andre Chappel; Shira H Fischer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joseph F McGuire; John Piacentini; Eric A Storch; Emily J Ricketts; Douglas W Woods; Alan L Peterson; John T Walkup; Sabine Wilhelm; Kesley Ramsey; Joey K-Y Essoe; Michael B Himle; Adam B Lewin; Susanna Chang; Tanya K Murphy; James T McCracken; Lawrence Scahill Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 4.791