Kathleen M McTigue1, Elan D Cohen2, Charity G Moore2, Alison E Hipwell3, Rolf Loeber3, Lewis H Kuller4. 1. Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kmm34@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The literature on environment and obesity is characterized by studies that are often cross-sectional and lack racial diversity. This study examined associations between neighborhood features and BMI development over 6 years in an urban sample of 2,295 girls (56% African American; mean age at baseline, 11.2 years) in 2004. Analyses were conducted in 2011-2015. METHODS: Girls, caregivers, and study staff completed annual neighborhood questionnaires. Linear mixed-effects modeling examined annual changes in neighborhood features and BMI and assessed whether baseline neighborhood features modified BMI growth over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 40% of participants were overweight/obese. Participants' neighborhoods had few neighborhood problems, moderate levels of safety issues and inconvenient features, low levels of neighborhood disorder, few cases of loitering youth, and substantial traffic volume. Adverse neighborhood features were more common for African American than white participants. Neighborhood features were relatively stable over the follow-up period. African American girls with helpful neighbors had lower annual BMI growth (-0.09 kg/m(2)) than others. For white girls, BMI increased more for girls with helpful neighbors (+0.09 kg/m(2) annually). Regardless of race, living in a U.S. Census tract with low levels of educational achievement was linked with higher BMI growth (an additional 0.07 kg/m(2) annually). Girls living in Census tracts with high (versus low) levels of poverty gained an additional 0.08 kg/m(2) gain annually. CONCLUSIONS: Social environment features are associated with BMI change in white and African American urban girls and may be helpful for identifying girls at risk for early adolescent weight gain.
INTRODUCTION: The literature on environment and obesity is characterized by studies that are often cross-sectional and lack racial diversity. This study examined associations between neighborhood features and BMI development over 6 years in an urban sample of 2,295 girls (56% African American; mean age at baseline, 11.2 years) in 2004. Analyses were conducted in 2011-2015. METHODS:Girls, caregivers, and study staff completed annual neighborhood questionnaires. Linear mixed-effects modeling examined annual changes in neighborhood features and BMI and assessed whether baseline neighborhood features modified BMI growth over time. RESULTS: At baseline, 40% of participants were overweight/obese. Participants' neighborhoods had few neighborhood problems, moderate levels of safety issues and inconvenient features, low levels of neighborhood disorder, few cases of loitering youth, and substantial traffic volume. Adverse neighborhood features were more common for African American than white participants. Neighborhood features were relatively stable over the follow-up period. African American girls with helpful neighbors had lower annual BMI growth (-0.09 kg/m(2)) than others. For white girls, BMI increased more for girls with helpful neighbors (+0.09 kg/m(2) annually). Regardless of race, living in a U.S. Census tract with low levels of educational achievement was linked with higher BMI growth (an additional 0.07 kg/m(2) annually). Girls living in Census tracts with high (versus low) levels of poverty gained an additional 0.08 kg/m(2) gain annually. CONCLUSIONS: Social environment features are associated with BMI change in white and African American urban girls and may be helpful for identifying girls at risk for early adolescent weight gain.
Authors: Sue Y S Kimm; Nancy W Glynn; Andrea M Kriska; Bruce A Barton; Shari S Kronsberg; Stephen R Daniels; Patricia B Crawford; Zak I Sabry; Kiang Liu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christine M Hoehner; Laura K Brennan Ramirez; Michael B Elliott; Susan L Handy; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alison E Hipwell; Rolf Loeber; Magda Stouthamer-Loeber; Kate Keenan; Helene R White; Leoniek Kroneman Journal: Crim Behav Ment Health Date: 2002
Authors: Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Alison E Hipwell; Andrea M Kriska; Kristi L Storti; Kathleen M McTigue Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.411