Moriah J Brier1, Dianne Chambless1, Robert Gross2, H Irene Su3, Angela DeMichele4, Jun J Mao5. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Jun.Mao@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Poor adherence to oral adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer is a common problem, but little is known about the relationship between self-report adherence measures and hormonal suppression. We evaluated the relationship of three self-report measures of medication adherence and oestrogen among patients on aromatase inhibitors (AIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 235 women with breast cancer who were prescribed AI therapy. Participants self-reported AI adherence by completing the following: (1) a single item asking whether they took an AI in the last month, (2) a modified Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) and (3) the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Serum estrone and estradiol were analysed using organic solvent extraction and Celite column partition chromatography, followed by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Ten percent of participants reported they had not taken an AI in the last month and among this group, median estrone (33.2 pg/ml [interquartile range (IQR)=22.3]) and estradiol levels (7.2 pg/mL [IQR=3.3]) were significantly higher than those in participants who reported AI use (median estrone=11.5 pg/mL [IQR=4.9]; median estradiol=3.4 pg/mL [IQR=2.1]; p<0.001). This relationship held when controlling for race and AI drug type. CONCLUSIONS: A single-item monthly-recall adherence measure for AIs was associated with oestrogen serum levels. This suggests that patient-reported monthly adherence may be a useful measure to identify early non-adherence behaviour and guide interventions to improve patient adherence to hormonal treatment.
PURPOSE: Poor adherence to oral adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer is a common problem, but little is known about the relationship between self-report adherence measures and hormonal suppression. We evaluated the relationship of three self-report measures of medication adherence and oestrogen among patients on aromatase inhibitors (AIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 235 women with breast cancer who were prescribed AI therapy. Participants self-reported AI adherence by completing the following: (1) a single item asking whether they took an AI in the last month, (2) a modified Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) and (3) the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Serum estrone and estradiol were analysed using organic solvent extraction and Celite column partition chromatography, followed by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Ten percent of participants reported they had not taken an AI in the last month and among this group, median estrone (33.2 pg/ml [interquartile range (IQR)=22.3]) and estradiol levels (7.2 pg/mL [IQR=3.3]) were significantly higher than those in participants who reported AI use (median estrone=11.5 pg/mL [IQR=4.9]; median estradiol=3.4 pg/mL [IQR=2.1]; p<0.001). This relationship held when controlling for race and AI drug type. CONCLUSIONS: A single-item monthly-recall adherence measure for AIs was associated with oestrogen serum levels. This suggests that patient-reported monthly adherence may be a useful measure to identify early non-adherence behaviour and guide interventions to improve patient adherence to hormonal treatment.
Authors: Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Jonathan Sevilla-Cazes; Brian S Finkleman; Jinbo Chen; Colleen M Brensinger; Andrew E Epstein; Michael B Streiff; Stephen E Kimmel Journal: Am J Med Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Mark J Butler; Rikki M Tanner; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo; Adam P Bress; Amanda J Shallcross; Mario Sims; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Tanya M Spruill Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2017-07-06
Authors: Jose Antonio Baz-Lomba; Stefania Salvatore; Emma Gracia-Lor; Richard Bade; Sara Castiglioni; Erika Castrignanò; Ana Causanilles; Felix Hernandez; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Juliet Kinyua; Ann-Kathrin McCall; Alexander van Nuijs; Christoph Ort; Benedek G Plósz; Pedram Ramin; Malcolm Reid; Nikolaos I Rousis; Yeonsuk Ryu; Pim de Voogt; Jorgen Bramness; Kevin Thomas Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Yiqi Pan; Sarah R Heisig; Pia von Blanckenburg; Ute-Susann Albert; Peyman Hadji; Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eng Hooi Tan; Andrea Li Ann Wong; Chuan Chien Tan; Patrick Wong; Sing Huang Tan; Li En Yvonne Ang; Siew Eng Lim; Wan Qin Chong; Jingshan Ho; Soo Chin Lee; Bee Choo Tai Journal: Breast Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 4.380