Literature DB >> 26168506

Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology.

Yoel Inbar1, Joris Lammers2.   

Abstract

A lack of political diversity in psychology is said to lead to a number of pernicious outcomes, including biased research and active discrimination against conservatives. We surveyed a large number (combined N = 800) of social and personality psychologists and discovered several interesting facts. First, although only 6% described themselves as conservative "overall," there was more diversity of political opinion on economic issues and foreign policy. Second, respondents significantly underestimated the proportion of conservatives among their colleagues. Third, conservatives fear negative consequences of revealing their political beliefs to their colleagues. Finally, they are right to do so: In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists said that they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues. The more liberal respondents were, the more they said they would discriminate.
© The Author(s) 2012.

Keywords:  conservative; diversity; political ideology; social psychology

Year:  2012        PMID: 26168506     DOI: 10.1177/1745691612448792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  11 in total

Review 1.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.

Authors:  Kathryn Bruchmann; Birgit Koopmann-Holm; Aaron Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A Social Psychological Model of Scientific Practices: Explaining Research Practices and Outlining the Potential for Successful Reforms.

Authors:  Lee Jussim; Jon A Krosnick; Sean T Stevens; Stephanie M Anglin
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 4.  Blind spots in stigma research? Broadening our perspective on mental illness stigma by exploring 'what matters most' in modern Western societies.

Authors:  G Schomerus; M C Angermeyer
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures.

Authors:  Renae Marshall; Matthew G Burgess
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.174

6.  Scientometric analyses of studies on the role of innate variation in athletic performance.

Authors:  Michael P Lombardo; Shadie Emiah
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-06-24

7.  Debunking the Myth of Value-Neutral Virginity: Toward Truth in Scientific Advertising.

Authors:  David R Mandel; Philip E Tetlock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30

8.  Larregue's Critique of Cofnas et al. (2017): A Rejoinder.

Authors:  Nathan Cofnas; Noah Carl; Michael A Woodley Of Menie
Journal:  Am Sociol       Date:  2018-03-12

9.  Datasets from a research project examining the role of politics in social psychological research.

Authors:  Domenico Viganola; Orly Eitan; Yoel Inbar; Anna Dreber; Magnus Johannesson; Thomas Pfeiffer; Stefan Thau; Eric Luis Uhlmann
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  The influence of gain-loss framing and its interaction with political ideology on social distancing and mask wearing compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jordan Steffen; Jiuqing Cheng
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.