Literature DB >> 26168063

Higher 30-day and 60-day readmissions among patients who refuse post acute care services.

Maxim Topaz, Youjeong Kang, Diane E Holland, Brenda Ohta, Kathy Rickard, Kathryn H Bowles1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare patients who accepted ("acceptors") post acute care services (PAC) with those who were offered services and refused ("refusers") in terms of their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life, health-related problems, and unmet needs; and to examine the association between refusing PAC services and the risk for 30- and 60-day readmission. STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary data analysis from a cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Bivariate analysis and logistic regressions were used to examine the association between refusing PAC services and 30- and 60-day readmission.
RESULTS: A convenience sample of 495 PAC-referred patients 55 years and older discharged from 2 large academic medical centers in the northeastern United States completed the study questionnaires, with a resulting 28% (n = 139) that refused PAC services. Refusers were significantly younger (average age 68 years vs 73 years; P < .001), as well as more likely to be married (62% vs 46%; P < .001), privately insured (35% vs 18%; P < .001), and with lower risk of mortality/severity of illness. Refusers also had shorter hospital stays (4.8 days vs 7.5 days; P < .001); higher quality of life after discharge (0.83 vs 0.73; P < .001); and fewer unmet needs after discharge. However, refusers had higher 30-day (21% vs 16%; P = .17) and 60-day (31% vs 25%; P = .18) readmission rates; with logistic regression showing about twice-higher odds of 30-day (OR [odds ratio], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11-3.02; P = .01) and 60-day (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.11-3.02; P = .02) readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: PAC refusers are younger, better educated, and healthier, but they have twice-higher odds of 30- and 60-day readmissions, compared with PAC acceptors. Further investigation into reasons for PAC refusal is critical to foster enhanced patient communication regarding PAC services, improve rates of service acceptance, and ultimately decrease readmissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26168063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  9 in total

1.  Validating Performance of a Hospital Discharge Planning Decision Tool in Community Hospitals.

Authors:  Diane E Holland; Cheryl Brandt; Paul V Targonski; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct

2.  Patient Factors Linked with Return Acute Healthcare Use in Older Adults by Discharge Disposition.

Authors:  Susan K Keim; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Mary D Naylor; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Comparison of algorithm advice for post-acute care referral to usual clinical decision-making: examination of 30-day acute healthcare utilization.

Authors:  Susan K Keim; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Validating Performance of a Hospital Discharge Planning Decision Tool in Community Hospitals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct

5.  Using a Decision Support Algorithm for Referrals to Post-Acute Care.

Authors:  Kathryn H Bowles; Sarah J Ratcliffe; John H Holmes; Sue Keim; Sheryl Potashnik; Emilia Flores; Diane Humbrecht; Christina R Whitehouse; Mary D Naylor
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making.

Authors:  Erin E Kennedy; Kathryn H Bowles; Subhash Aryal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Why older adults may decline offers of post-acute care services: A qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Justine S Sefcik; Ashley Z Ritter; Emilia J Flores; Rebecca H Nock; Jo-Ana D Chase; Christine Bradway; Sheryl Potashnik; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.361

8.  Patient Preferences for Information on Post-Acute Care Services.

Authors:  Justine S Sefcik; Rebecca H Nock; Emilia J Flores; Jo-Ana D Chase; Christine Bradway; Sheryl Potashnik; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.571

9.  Risks Perceived by Frail Male Patients, Family Caregivers and Clinicians in Hospital: Do they Change after Discharge? A Multiple Case Study.

Authors:  Véronique Provencher; Monia D'Amours; Chantal Viscogliosi; Manon Guay; Dominique Giroux; Véronique Dubé; Nathalie Delli-Colli; Hélène Corriveau; Mary Egan
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.120

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.