Literature DB >> 26167787

Individual Differences in Developmental Plasticity May Result From Stochastic Sampling.

Willem E Frankenhuis1, Karthik Panchanathan2.   

Abstract

The ability to adjust developmental trajectories based on experience is widespread in nature, including in humans. This plasticity is often adaptive, tailoring individuals to their local environment. However, it is less clear why some individuals are more sensitive to environmental influences than others. Explanations include differences in genes and differences in prior experiences. In this article, we present a novel hypothesis in the latter category. In some developmental domains, individuals must learn about the state of their environment before adapting accordingly. Because sampling environmental cues is a stochastic process, some individuals may receive a homogeneous sample, resulting in a confident estimate about the state of the world-these individuals specialize early. Other individuals may receive a heterogeneous, uninformative set of cues-those individuals will keep sampling. As a consequence, individual variation in plasticity may result from different degrees of confidence about the state of the environment. After developing the hypothesis, we conclude by discussing three empirical predictions.
© The Author(s) 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision theory; differential susceptibility; fetal programming; phenotypic plasticity; stochastic sampling

Year:  2011        PMID: 26167787     DOI: 10.1177/1745691611412602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  12 in total

1.  The evolution of sensitive periods in a model of incremental development.

Authors:  Karthik Panchanathan; Willem E Frankenhuis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Balancing sampling and specialization: an adaptationist model of incremental development.

Authors:  Willem E Frankenhuis; Karthik Panchanathan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Adaptive developmental plasticity in rhesus macaques: the serotonin transporter gene interacts with maternal care to affect juvenile social behaviour.

Authors:  Jesus E Madrid; Tara M Mandalaywala; Sean P Coyne; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Joseph P Garner; Christina S Barr; Dario Maestripieri; Karen J Parker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Vaughan Bell
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-17

Review 5.  Plasticity-mediated persistence in new and changing environments.

Authors:  Matthew R J Morris
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-10-15

6.  Local environmental quality positively predicts breastfeeding in the UK's Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Laura J Brown; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 7.  Why and how the early-life environment affects development of coping behaviours.

Authors:  M Rohaa Langenhof; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Modeling the evolution of sensitive periods.

Authors:  Willem E Frankenhuis; Nicole Walasek
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Learning to represent a multi-context environment: more than detecting changes.

Authors:  Ting Qian; T Florian Jaeger; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-20

Review 10.  Adaptive explanations for sensitive windows in development.

Authors:  Tim W Fawcett; Willem E Frankenhuis
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.