Literature DB >> 26165835

Opposing effects of pericentrin and microcephalin on the pericentriolar material regulate CHK1 activation in the DNA damage response.

A K Antonczak1, L I Mullee1, Y Wang1, D Comartin2, T Inoue3, L Pelletier2, C G Morrison1.   

Abstract

Genotoxic stresses lead to centrosome amplification, a frequently-observed feature in cancer that may contribute to genome instability and to tumour cell invasion. Here we have explored how the centrosome controls DNA damage responses. For most of the cell cycle, centrosomes consist of two centrioles embedded in the proteinaceous pericentriolar material (PCM). Recent data indicate that the PCM is not an amorphous assembly of proteins, but actually a highly organised scaffold around the centrioles. The large coiled-coil protein, pericentrin, participates in PCM assembly and has been implicated in the control of DNA damage responses (DDRs) through its interactions with checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and microcephalin (MCPH1). CHK1 is required for DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification, whereas MCPH1 deficiency greatly increases the amplification seen after DNA damage. We found that the PCM showed a marked expansion in volume and a noticeable change in higher-order organisation after ionising radiation treatment. PCM expansion was dependent on CHK1 kinase activity and was potentiated by MCPH1 deficiency. Furthermore, pericentrin deficiency or mutation of a separase cleavage site blocked DNA damage-induced PCM expansion. The extent of nuclear CHK1 activation after DNA damage reflected the level of PCM expansion, with a reduction in pericentrin-deficient or separase cleavage site mutant-expressing cells, and an increase in MCPH1-deficient cells that was suppressed by the loss of pericentrin. Deletion of the nuclear export signal of CHK1 led to its hyperphosphorylation after irradiation and reduced centrosome amplification. Deletion of the nuclear localisation signal led to low CHK1 activation and low centrosome amplification. From these data, we propose a feedback loop from the PCM to the nuclear DDR in which CHK1 regulates pericentrin-dependent PCM expansion to control its own activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26165835     DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  48 in total

1.  Specific role of Chk1 phosphorylations in cell survival and checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Niida; Yuko Katsuno; Birendranath Banerjee; M Prakash Hande; Makoto Nakanishi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  MCPH1 regulates the neuroprogenitor division mode by coupling the centrosomal cycle with mitotic entry through the Chk1-Cdc25 pathway.

Authors:  Ralph Gruber; Zhongwei Zhou; Mikhail Sukchev; Tjard Joerss; Pierre-Olivier Frappart; Zhao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperate to induce mitotic defects and genomic instability by uncoupling centrosome duplication from the cell division cycle.

Authors:  S Duensing; L Y Lee; A Duensing; J Basile; S Piboonniyom; S Gonzalez; C P Crum; K Munger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Coupling cellular localization and function of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in checkpoints and cell viability.

Authors:  Jingna Wang; Xiangzi Han; Xiujing Feng; Zhenghe Wang; Youwei Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  G A Pihan; A Purohit; J Wallace; R Malhotra; L Liotta; S J Doxsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Essential function of Chk1 can be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control.

Authors:  Deborah Wilsker; Eva Petermann; Thomas Helleday; Fred Bunz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification.

Authors:  Emer Bourke; Helen Dodson; Andreas Merdes; Lorraine Cuffe; George Zachos; Mark Walker; David Gillespie; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Subdiffraction imaging of centrosomes reveals higher-order organizational features of pericentriolar material.

Authors:  Steffen Lawo; Monica Hasegan; Gagan D Gupta; Laurence Pelletier
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Structured illumination of the interface between centriole and peri-centriolar material.

Authors:  Jingyan Fu; David M Glover
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.411

10.  Excess centrosomes disrupt endothelial cell migration via centrosome scattering.

Authors:  Erich J Kushner; Luke S Ferro; Jie-Yu Liu; Jessica R Durrant; Stephen L Rogers; Andrew C Dudley; Victoria L Bautch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Centrosomes in the DNA damage response--the hub outside the centre.

Authors:  Lisa I Mullee; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Centrosome amplification: a suspect in breast cancer and racial disparities.

Authors:  Angela Ogden; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Mitotic entry upon Topo II catalytic inhibition is controlled by Chk1 and Plk1.

Authors:  Maria Arroyo; Ana Cañuelo; Jesús Calahorra; Florian D Hastert; Antonio Sánchez; Duncan J Clarke; J Alberto Marchal
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 4.  Centrosome Aberrations as Drivers of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katrina M Piemonte; Lindsey J Anstine; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.051

5.  The Seckel syndrome and centrosomal protein Ninein localizes asymmetrically to stem cell centrosomes but is not required for normal development, behavior, or DNA damage response in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yiming Zheng; Vito Mennella; Steven Marks; Jill Wildonger; Esraa Elnagdi; David Agard; Timothy L Megraw
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  STIL balancing primary microcephaly and cancer.

Authors:  Dhruti Patwardhan; Shyamala Mani; Sandrine Passemard; Pierre Gressens; Vincent El Ghouzzi
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Drosophila PLP assembles pericentriolar clouds that promote centriole stability, cohesion and MT nucleation.

Authors:  Helio Roque; Saroj Saurya; Metta B Pratt; Errin Johnson; Jordan W Raff
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Ciliogenesis and the DNA damage response: a stressful relationship.

Authors:  Colin A Johnson; Spencer J Collis
Journal:  Cilia       Date:  2016-06-22

Review 9.  Nuclear roles for cilia-associated proteins.

Authors:  Tristan D McClure-Begley; Michael W Klymkowsky
Journal:  Cilia       Date:  2017-05-25

10.  Caspase-mediated cleavage of the centrosomal proteins during apoptosis.

Authors:  Mi Young Seo; Kunsoo Rhee
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.