| Literature DB >> 26165304 |
Chengzhi Xie1, Zhenhui Lu2, Guoxing Liu1, Yu Fang1, Jiefeng Liu1, Zhao Huang1, Fusheng Wang1, Xiaolong Wu1, Xiaohua Lei1, Xiaocheng Li1, Yueming Zhang1, Zecheng Hu1, Ke Qian1, Jixiong Hu1, Shengfu Huang1, Dewu Zhong1, Xundi Xu1.
Abstract
Numb, an endocytic adaptor, is a known cell fate determinant that participates in asymmetric cell division. The present study aimed to explore the potential roles of Numb in hepatocarcinogenesis. Numb expression was investigated in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) with reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical examination; its association with the prognosis of HCC patients was analyzed. In addition, the effects of Numb deletion on proliferation of HCC cells and its relevant molecules were evaluated in Huh7 and HepG2 cells. Numb overexpression was observed in 62% of adjacent non‑tumor tissues and 46% of tumor tissues. Overexpression of Numb in HCC was associated with histological grade, portal vein invasion and the number of tumors (P=0.001, 0.022 and 0.034 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that Numb expression was an independent prognostic indicator of HCC patients. Methylation of the Numb promoter contributed to hepatocarcinogenesis. In vitro assays demonstrated that Numb silencing resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, downregulation of cyclin‑dependent protein kinase 4 (CDK4) and S‑phase kinase‑associated protein 2 (SKP2), and upregulation of Bcl‑2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK) and cyclin‑dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21). The present study suggests that downregulation of Numb inhibits colony formation and cell proliferation, induces apoptosis of HCC cells and independently predicts the poor prognosis of HCC patients. Thus, Numb has a potential role in the development and progression of HCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26165304 PMCID: PMC4533774 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
DNA sequences of the primers used in the study.
| Primer name | Sequence 5′→3′ |
|---|---|
| RT-qPCR | |
| β-actin-F | ATCATGTTTGAGACCTTCAACA |
| β-actin-R | CATCTCTTGCTCGAAGTCCA |
| | GGCATACAGAGGTTCCTACA |
| | TGCTCCTTTGACCGCTAC |
| | CAGGGCTTAGGACTTGGTTT |
| | TTTTTTCAGGGTGAGGGGAT |
| | CTTTCTGGGTGTTCTGGATT |
| | GGAGCAATTAATCTGTAGATGAGG |
| | GCAGCGGAACAAGGAGT |
| | GGAGAAACGGGAACCAG |
| | CCCGAAGTTCTTCTGCAGTC |
| | GTCGGCTTCAGATTTCCAC |
| MSP | |
| | TTTCGAAAGTGTTGGGATTATATAC |
| | AACTACAATAAACCAAAATCGCG |
| | TTGAAAGTGTTGGGATTATATATGT |
| | AACTACAATAAACCAAAATCACACC |
RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; F, forward; R, reverse; MSP, methylation-specific PCR; CDK4, cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4; SKP2, S-phase kinase-associated protein 2; Bak, Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer; p21, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1.
Figure 1Expression of Numb in samples from hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) patients. (A) Expression of Numb in non-tumorous and tumor liver tissues detected by immunohistochemistry; (a) chronic hepatitis, (b) liver cirrhosis, (c) moderately differentiated HCC, (d) poorly differentiated HCC. Magnification, ×100. (B) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to examine Numb mRNA expression from 13 paired HCC tissues and their non-tumor counterparts. The results (mean ± standard deviation) were normalised for β-actin expression. Statistical analysis was performed comparing liver cirrhosis, well- and moderately differentiated tumors, and poorly differentiated tumors with chronic hepatitis; *P<0.05; and liver cirrhosis, and well-and moderately differentiated tumors compared with poorly differentiated tumors; ▲P<0.05. (C) The representative expression of Numb as assessed by western blot analysis. Lane 1, chronic hepatitis B; lanes 2 and 4, moderately differentiated tumors; lanes 3 and 5, liver cirrhosis; lane 6, poorly differentiated tumor. (D) Methylation of Numb promoter in HCC tissues was determined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). (E) MSP showed that the methylation of Numb was significantly detected in HCC tissues (T) compared with the corresponding non-tumorous tissues (N); n=19, P<0.01. M, methylated DNA; U, unmethylated DNA.
Immunohistochemical analysis of Numb in cancer and non-cancer liver tissues.
| Pathological category | No. | Staining intensity for Numb, no.
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||
| Normal liver | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Chronic hepatitis | 24 | 20 | 4 |
| Cirrhosis | 58 | 9 | 49 |
| HCC | 85 | 46 | 39 |
Intensity of Numb staining varied significantly according to liver disease state.
Comparison with normal liver (P=0.007);
with chronic hepatitis (P<0.001); and
with cirrhosis (P<0.001). HCC, hepatocellular carcinomas.
Association between Numb expression and clinicopathological parameters in HCC.
| Parameter | n | Expression of Numb, n
| P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| Age, years | ||||
| ≥60 | 55 | 24 | 21 | |
| <60 | 30 | 22 | 8 | NS |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 62 | 36 | 26 | |
| Female | 23 | 10 | 13 | NS |
| Tumor size, cm | ||||
| <5 | 12 | 4 | 8 | |
| | 73 | 42 | 31 | NS |
| Histological grade | ||||
| Well/moderately differentiated | 46 | 10 | 36 | |
| Poorly/undifferentiated | 39 | 36 | 3 | 0.001 |
| Portal vein invasion | ||||
| Yes | 24 | 16 | 8 | |
| No | 61 | 30 | 31 | 0.022 |
| No. of tumors | ||||
| Solitary | 58 | 31 | 27 | |
| Multiple | 27 | 15 | 12 | 0.034 |
| Capsular formation | ||||
| Yes | 36 | 21 | 15 | |
| No | 49 | 25 | 24 | NS |
Patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were divided into Numb 'high' group (final density was higher compared with the median) and 'low' group (final density was lower compared with the median). The patient and disease profiles in each group were compared. NS, not significant between any groups.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with survival rate and recurrence.
| Factors | Overall survival
| Cumulative recurrence
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate
| Multivariate
| Univariate
| Multivariate
| |||
| P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Age, years | ||||||
| <65 | 0.646 | 0.694 | 0.376 | 0.971 | 0.866 | 0.733 |
| ≥65 | (0.349–2.753) | (0.378–1.981) | ||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 0.504 | 0.980 | 0.970 | 0.607 | 0.979 | 0.968 |
| Female | (0.340–2.647) | (0.346–2.772) | ||||
| Low | <0.001 | 9.303 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 13.600 | <0.001 |
| High | (2.812–30.779) | (3.695–50.056) | ||||
| Tumor size, cm | ||||||
| <3 | 0.681 | 0.925 | 0.598 | 0.856 | 0.950 | 0.906 |
| ≥3 | (0.396–2.157) | (0.405–2.226) | ||||
| Tumor differentiation | ||||||
| I/II | <0.001 | 0.349 | 0.013 | <0.001 | 0.332 | 0.009 |
| III/IV | (0.151–0.803) | (0.144–0.762) | ||||
| Tumor number | ||||||
| Solitary | 0.001 | 0.565 | 0.207 | 0.010 | 0.848 | 0.719 |
| Multiple | (0.232–1.373) | (0.345–2.084) | ||||
| Portal vein invasion | ||||||
| No | <0.001 | 0.403 | 0.041 | <0.001 | 0.271 | 0.005 |
| Yes | (0.168–0.964) | (0.110–0.671) | ||||
| Tumor encapsulation | ||||||
| No | 0.369 | 1.282 | 0.588 | 0.747 | 0.910 | 0.844 |
| Yes | (0.521–3.156) | (0.359–2.311) | ||||
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-free and overall survival in 85 cases based on Numb expression. Compared with the group with low Numb expression, (A) the disease-free and (B) overall survival were significantly higher in the group with high Numb expression.
Figure 3Oncogenetic potential of Numb in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). (A) As shown by representative dishes, Numb depletion significantly inhibited the colony formation of Huh7 cells in soft agar culture. Quantitative analyses of colony numbers are shown in the lower panel. Values are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of ≥3 independent experiments. (B) MTT assay was performed in Huh7 and HepG2 cells. Growth curves of Numb small interfering RNA (siRNA) cells were compared with the scramble cells, respectively. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of ≥3 independent experiments. (C) Flow cytometric analysis showing that Numb siRNA for 24 h increased the G0-G1 phase fraction and decreased the S phase fraction when compared to the scramble treated cultures in Huh7 cells. (D-a) Representative images of TUNEL staining. A larger quantity of apoptotic cells were detected following treatment of Huh7 cells with Numb siRNA in comparison with that of the scramble cells. (D-b) The apoptotic index was compared between Numb siRNA and scramble cells (right panel).**P<0.01, *P<0.001.
Figure 4Numb inhibition inducing upregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21) and Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK), and downregulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4 (CDK4) and S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2). (A) Numb small interfering RNA (siRNA) increased p21 and BAK expression, and decreased CDK4 and SKP2 expression at the mRNA level by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. Experiments were performed 24 (p21) and 48 h (BAK, CDK4 and SKP2) after Numb siRNA transfection with Huh7 cells. (B) siRNA against Numb induced p21 and BAK expression, and suppressed CDK4 and SKP2 expression at the protein level. GAPDH served as a loading control. *P<0.05.