Literature DB >> 26165221

Risk Modeling Predicts Complication Rates for Spinal Surgery.

Kristopher T Kimmell1, Hanna Algattas, Patrick Joynt, Tyler Schmidt, Babak S Jahromi, Howard J Silberstein, G Edward Vates.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of clinical data registry.
OBJECTIVE: In the current era of quality reporting and pay for performance, neurosurgeons must develop models to identify patients at high risk of complications. We sought to identify risk factors for complications in spine surgery and to develop a score predictive of complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We examined spinal surgeries from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. 22,430 cases were identified based on common procedural terminology.
METHODS: Univariate analysis followed by multivariate regression was used to identify significant factors.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate for the cohort was 9.9%. The most common complications were postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion (4.1%), nonwound infections (3.1%), and wound-related infections (2.2%). Multivariate regression analysis identified 20 factors associated with complications. Assigning 1 point for the presence of each factor a risk model was developed. The range of scores for the cohort was 0 to 13 with a median score of 4. Complication rates for a risk score of 0 to 4 was 3.7% and for scores 5 to 13 was 18.5%. The risk model robustly predicted complication rates, with complication rate of 1.2% for score of 0 (n = 412, 1.8% of total) and 63.6% and 100% for scores of 12 and 13 (n = 22 patients, 0.1% of total cohort) respectively (P < 0.001). The risk score also correlated strongly with total length of stay, mortality, and total work relative value units for the case.
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific risk factors including comorbidities are strongly associated with surgical complications, length of stay, cost of care, and mortality in spine surgery and can be used to develop risk models that are highly predictive of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26165221     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications following spine surgery.

Authors:  Keaton F Piper; Samuel B Tomlinson; Gabrielle Santangelo; Joseph Van Galen; Ian DeAndrea-Lazarus; James Towner; Kristopher T Kimmell; Howard Silberstein; George Edward Vates
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-01

2.  Locoregional Flap Closure for High-risk Multilevel Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob R Rinkinen; Rachel E Weitzman; Jason B Clain; Jonathan Lans; John H Shin; Kyle R Eberlin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 3.  Clinical Outcomes Associated With Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Collin W Blackburn; Katherine L Morrow; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Jessica E DeCaro; Judith M Gron; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-10-11

4.  Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

5.  The role of the plastic surgeon in wound repair after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ashley M Brown; Salah Rubayi
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-09-17

6.  Cervical Spine Injuries with Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Surgery Adverse Events and Their Association with Neurological and Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Thomas Liebscher; Johanna Ludwig; Tom Lübstorf; Martin Kreutzträger; Thomas Auhuber; Ulrike Grittner; Benedikt Schäfer; Grit Wüstner; Axel Ekkernkamp; Marcel A Kopp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.