Christophe Joubert1, Tarek Adetchessi2, Emilie Peltier3, Thomas Graillon2, Henry Dufour2, Benjamin Blondel3, Stephane Fuentes2. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France. Electronic address: christophe.joubert@neurochirurgie.fr. 2. Department of Spine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France. 3. Department of Spine Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic disease of the spine requires a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach to patient care, especially, for patients in a lot of pain with neurological deficit or spinal instability requiring surgical stabilization. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to report our experience on 34 patients who underwent spinal metastasis resection. We used a single-stage posterior approach with vertebral body reconstruction by an expandable titanium cage and a posterior instrumentation. The parameters assessed were neurologic status, OMS score, angle of sagittal deformity, and morbidity. METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2014 we performed a monocentric consecutive case review of 34 patients with vertebral body tumor. All of them underwent a single-stage vertebrectomy with circumferential reconstruction and an arthrodesis by posterior approach. RESULTS: 34 patients underwent a single stage surgery by posterior approach, including 30 thoracic lesions and 4 lumbar lesions. Pre operatively, sixteen patients presented a neurologic impairment. The mean follow-up was 13.7 months [1-32 m]. No neurologic impairment was observed in the 34 cases. At the last term of follow-up, neurologic status was improved in 23 cases. OMS score was improved in 23 cases (67.6 %), and worsened in one case. Before surgery, the average of visual analogic scale was 8.94/10 [7-10] and decreased to 2.62/10 [1-5] after surgery. Single posterior approach surgery significantly reduced the average sagittal deformity to 10.0° (0.01-19.96; P = 0.013, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSION: Our outcomes suggest that it will be more efficient to perform an aggressive approach in spinal metastatic treatment in order to improve quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Metastatic disease of the spine requires a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach to patient care, especially, for patients in a lot of pain with neurological deficit or spinal instability requiring surgical stabilization. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to report our experience on 34 patients who underwent spinal metastasis resection. We used a single-stage posterior approach with vertebral body reconstruction by an expandable titanium cage and a posterior instrumentation. The parameters assessed were neurologic status, OMS score, angle of sagittal deformity, and morbidity. METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2014 we performed a monocentric consecutive case review of 34 patients with vertebral body tumor. All of them underwent a single-stage vertebrectomy with circumferential reconstruction and an arthrodesis by posterior approach. RESULTS: 34 patients underwent a single stage surgery by posterior approach, including 30 thoracic lesions and 4 lumbar lesions. Pre operatively, sixteen patients presented a neurologic impairment. The mean follow-up was 13.7 months [1-32 m]. No neurologic impairment was observed in the 34 cases. At the last term of follow-up, neurologic status was improved in 23 cases. OMS score was improved in 23 cases (67.6 %), and worsened in one case. Before surgery, the average of visual analogic scale was 8.94/10 [7-10] and decreased to 2.62/10 [1-5] after surgery. Single posterior approach surgery significantly reduced the average sagittal deformity to 10.0° (0.01-19.96; P = 0.013, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSION: Our outcomes suggest that it will be more efficient to perform an aggressive approach in spinal metastatic treatment in order to improve quality of life.
Authors: Michael Kwok; Andrew S Zhang; Kevin J DiSilvestro; J Andrew Younghein; Eren O Kuris; Alan H Daniels Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2021-09-29
Authors: Christoph Wipplinger; Sara Lener; Christoph Orban; Tamara M Wipplinger; Anto Abramovic; Anna Lang; Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Hanna Nowak; Dominika Maria Szwacka; Monika Pater; Wojciech Krzysztof Mrugalski; Michał Grzegorz Milczarek; Magdalena Staniszewska; Roman Jankowski; Anna-Maria Barciszewska Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 6.575