Literature DB >> 26164123

An Oral Pressure Conversion Ratio as a Predictor of Vocal Efficiency.

Ingo R Titze1, Lynn Maxfield2, Anil Palaparthi2.   

Abstract

Voice production is an inefficient process in terms of energy expended versus acoustic energy produced. A traditional efficiency measure, glottal efficiency, relates acoustic power radiated from the mouth to aerodynamic power produced in the trachea. This efficiency ranges between 0.0001% and 1.0%. It involves lung pressure and hence would appear to be a useful effort measure for a given acoustic output. Difficulty in the combined measurement of lung pressure and tracheal airflow, however, has impeded clinical application of glottal efficiency. This article uses the large data base from Schutte (1980) and a few new measurements to validate a pressure conversion ratio (PCR) as a substitute for glottal efficiency. PCR has the potential for wide application because of low cost and ease of use in clinics and vocal studios.
Copyright © 2016 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC/DC ratio; Oral pressure; Vocal efficiency; Vocal effort

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26164123      PMCID: PMC5877423          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  20 in total

1.  A quantitative output-cost ratio in voice production.

Authors:  D A Berry; K Verdolini; D W Montequin; M M Hess; R W Chan; I R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.

Authors:  Yolanda D Heman-Ackah; Reinhardt J Heuer; Deirdre D Michael; Rosemary Ostrowski; Michelle Horman; Margaret M Baroody; James Hillenbrand; Robert T Sataloff
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Theoretical analysis of maximum flow declination rate versus maximum area declination rate in phonation.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Can vocal economy in phonation be increased with an artificially lengthened vocal tract? A computer modeling study.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Anne-Maria Laukkanen
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.487

5.  Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics.

Authors:  J Gauffin; J Sundberg
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-09

6.  A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal air flow waveform during voicing.

Authors:  M Rothenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress.

Authors:  J J Jiang; I R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Initial validation of an indirect measure of subglottal pressure during vowels.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; B Carlborg; P Kitzing
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phonation threshold pressure measurements during phonation by airflow interruption.

Authors:  J Jiang; T O'Mara; D Conley; D Hanson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Evidence for distinguishing pressed, normal, resonant, and breathy voice qualities by laryngeal resistance and vocal efficiency in vocally trained subjects.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Katherine Verdolini
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiation efficiency for long-range vocal communication in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Anil Palaparthi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Impact of Nonmodal Phonation on Estimates of Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Estimation of Subglottal Pressure From Neck Surface Vibration in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; James A Burns; Tiffiny A Hron; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.

Authors:  Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.856

5.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration During Normal Voice Production.

Authors:  Amanda S Fryd; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The vocal organ of hummingbirds shows convergence with songbirds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Christopher R Olson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.