Literature DB >> 26164108

Complex and changing patterns of natural selection explain the evolution of the human hip.

Mark Grabowski1, Charles C Roseman2.   

Abstract

Causal explanations for the dramatic changes that occurred during the evolution of the human hip focus largely on selection for bipedal function and locomotor efficiency. These hypotheses rest on two critical assumptions. The first-that these anatomical changes served functional roles in bipedalism-has been supported in numerous analyses showing how postcranial changes likely affected locomotion. The second-that morphological changes that did play functional roles in bipedalism were the result of selection for that behavior-has not been previously explored and represents a major gap in our understanding of hominin hip evolution. Here we use evolutionary quantitative genetic models to test the hypothesis that strong directional selection on many individual aspects of morphology was responsible for the large differences observed across a sample of fossil hominin hips spanning the Plio-Pleistocene. Our approach uses covariance among traits and the differences between relatively complete fossils to estimate the net selection pressures that drove the major transitions in hominin hip evolution. Our findings show a complex and changing pattern of natural selection drove hominin hip evolution, and that many, but not all, traits hypothesized to play functional roles in bipedalism evolved as a direct result of natural selection. While the rate of evolutionary change for all transitions explored here does not exceed the amount expected if evolution was occurring solely through neutral processes, it was far above rates of evolution for morphological traits in other mammalian groups. Given that stasis is the norm in the mammalian fossil record, our results suggest that large shifts in the adaptive landscape drove hominin evolution.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipedalism; Correlated evolution; Hominin evolution; Selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26164108     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  11 in total

1.  Island Rule, quantitative genetics and brain-body size evolution in Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Pasquale Raia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Constraint, natural selection, and the evolution of human body form.

Authors:  Kristen R R Savell; Benjamin M Auerbach; Charles C Roseman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pattern and process in hominin brain size evolution are scale-dependent.

Authors:  Andrew Du; Andrew M Zipkin; Kevin G Hatala; Elizabeth Renner; Jennifer L Baker; Serena Bianchi; Kallista H Bernal; Bernard A Wood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Mate Choice and the Persistence of Maternal Mortality.

Authors:  Santosh Jagadeeshan; Alyssa K Gomes; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Cliff-edge model of obstetric selection in humans.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; Simon M Huttegger; Barbara Fischer; Mihaela Pavlicev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The pre-eminent role of directional selection in generating extreme morphological change in glyptodonts (Cingulata; Xenarthra).

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Gabriel Marroig; Alex Hubbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavličev; Roberto Romero; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 8.  Humans as inverted bats: A comparative approach to the obstetric conundrum.

Authors:  Nicole D S Grunstra; Frank E Zachos; Anna Nele Herdina; Barbara Fischer; Mihaela Pavličev; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Human shoulder development is adapted to obstetrical constraints.

Authors:  Mikaze Kawada; Masato Nakatsukasa; Takeshi Nishimura; Akihisa Kaneko; Naomichi Ogihara; Shigehito Yamada; Walter Coudyzer; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Marcia S Ponce de León; Naoki Morimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Skull variation in Afro-Eurasian monkeys results from both adaptive and non-adaptive evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Lauren Schroeder; Sarah Elton; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.