Gregory A Dore1, Shari R Waldstein, Michele K Evans, Alan B Zonderman. 1. From the Behavioral Epidemiology (Dore, Zonderman) and Health Disparities Research Sections (Evans), Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Psychology (Waldstein), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether race and poverty (income <125% of the federal poverty limit), modifies associations between diabetes and cognition in a biracial, urban-dwelling sample. METHODS: Cross-sectional data for 2066 participants (mean age = 47.6 years, 56.8% women, 56.2% African American, 38.6% below poverty) from the first wave of the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span study were used for analyses. Eleven tests measured cognitive function. Interactions among diabetes, race, and poverty status with cognition were assessed in multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Significant interactions among diabetes, race, and poverty status were observed. Among African Americans below poverty, diabetic individuals performed lower than nondiabetic individuals on California Verbal Learning Test Free Recall Short Delay (z = -0.444 [0.123] versus z = -0.137 [0.045]) and Long Delay (z = -0.299 [0.123] versus z = -0.130 [0.045]), Digit Span Backward (z = -0.347 [0.109] versus z = -0.072 [0.041]), and the Brief Test of Attention (z = -0.452 [-0.099] versus z = -0.099 [0.047]), and higher on Category Fluency (z = 0.114 [0.117] versus z = -0.118 [0.044]). No consistent differences between diabetic and nondiabetic individuals were found for African American and white participants above poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was associated with poorer verbal memory, working memory, and attention among African Americans living in poverty. Diabetic African Americans below poverty may have increased risk of cognitive deficit at a younger age. Improving health literacy, doctor-patient communication, and multidisciplinary medical care for impoverished individuals may reduce differences. Additional research is needed to clarify mechanisms underlying these associations.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether race and poverty (income <125% of the federal poverty limit), modifies associations between diabetes and cognition in a biracial, urban-dwelling sample. METHODS: Cross-sectional data for 2066 participants (mean age = 47.6 years, 56.8% women, 56.2% African American, 38.6% below poverty) from the first wave of the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span study were used for analyses. Eleven tests measured cognitive function. Interactions among diabetes, race, and poverty status with cognition were assessed in multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Significant interactions among diabetes, race, and poverty status were observed. Among African Americans below poverty, diabetic individuals performed lower than nondiabetic individuals on California Verbal Learning Test Free Recall Short Delay (z = -0.444 [0.123] versus z = -0.137 [0.045]) and Long Delay (z = -0.299 [0.123] versus z = -0.130 [0.045]), Digit Span Backward (z = -0.347 [0.109] versus z = -0.072 [0.041]), and the Brief Test of Attention (z = -0.452 [-0.099] versus z = -0.099 [0.047]), and higher on Category Fluency (z = 0.114 [0.117] versus z = -0.118 [0.044]). No consistent differences between diabetic and nondiabetic individuals were found for African American and white participants above poverty. CONCLUSIONS:Diabetes was associated with poorer verbal memory, working memory, and attention among African Americans living in poverty. Diabetic African Americans below poverty may have increased risk of cognitive deficit at a younger age. Improving health literacy, doctor-patient communication, and multidisciplinary medical care for impoverished individuals may reduce differences. Additional research is needed to clarify mechanisms underlying these associations.
Authors: Natalie Galanina; Vijaya Surampudi; Daniela Ciltea; Sant P Singh; Lawrence C Perlmuter Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2008 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: S R Lesage; T H Mosley; T Y Wong; M Szklo; D Knopman; D J Catellier; S R Cole; R Klein; J Coresh; L H Coker; A R Sharrett Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Brian S Schwartz; Thomas A Glass; Karen I Bolla; Walter F Stewart; Gregory Glass; Meghan Rasmussen; Joseph Bressler; Weiping Shi; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Eseosa T Ighodaro; Peter T Nelson; Walter A Kukull; Frederick A Schmitt; Erin L Abner; Allison Caban-Holt; Shoshana H Bardach; Derrick C Hord; Crystal M Glover; Gregory A Jicha; Linda J Van Eldik; Alexander X Byrd; Anita Fernander Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Raina L Croff; Phelps Witter Iv; Miya L Walker; Edline Francois; Charlie Quinn; Thomas C Riley; Nicole F Sharma; Jeffrey A Kaye Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2019-01-09
Authors: Rachel L Peterson; Kristen M George; Paola Gilsanz; Sarah Ackley; Elizabeth R Mayeda; M M Glymour; Dan M Mungas; Charles DeCarli; Rachel A Whitmer Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2021 Apr-Jun 01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Sean M O'Toole; Rebekah J Walker; Emma Garacci; Aprill Z Dawson; Jennifer A Campbell; Leonard E Egede Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Kumar B Rajan; Zoe Arvanitakis; Elizabeth B Lynch; Elizabeth A McAninch; Robert S Wilson; Jennifer Weuve; Lisa L Barnes; Antonio C Bianco; Denis A Evans Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 9.910