Yael Goverover1, Nancy Chiaravalloti2, John DeLuca3. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, USA yg243@nyu.edu. 2. Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, USA. 3. Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, a brief cognitive assessment (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis: BICAMS) has been recommended for use with patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) to screen for cognitive impairments. However, the relationship between the BICAMS and everyday life activity has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine whether the BICAMS can predict performance of activities of daily living using Actual Reality(TM) (AR) in persons with MS. METHOD: A between-subjects design was utilized to compare 41 individuals with MS and 32 healthy controls (HC) performing BICAMS and an AR task. Participants were asked to access the internet to purchase a flight ticket or cookies, and were administered the BICAMS and questionnaires to assess quality of life (QOL), affect symptomatology, and prior internet experience. RESULTS: Participants with MS performed significantly worse than HC on the BICAMS and the AR. Additionally, better BICAMS performance was associated with more independent AR performance. Self-reports of QOL were not correlated with AR or BICAMS performance. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with MS have greater problems with actual everyday life tasks as compared to HC. The BICAMS is a promising cognitive screening tool to predict actual functional performance in participants with MS.
BACKGROUND: Recently, a brief cognitive assessment (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis: BICAMS) has been recommended for use with patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) to screen for cognitive impairments. However, the relationship between the BICAMS and everyday life activity has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine whether the BICAMS can predict performance of activities of daily living using Actual Reality(TM) (AR) in persons with MS. METHOD: A between-subjects design was utilized to compare 41 individuals with MS and 32 healthy controls (HC) performing BICAMS and an AR task. Participants were asked to access the internet to purchase a flight ticket or cookies, and were administered the BICAMS and questionnaires to assess quality of life (QOL), affect symptomatology, and prior internet experience. RESULTS:Participants with MS performed significantly worse than HC on the BICAMS and the AR. Additionally, better BICAMS performance was associated with more independent AR performance. Self-reports of QOL were not correlated with AR or BICAMS performance. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with MS have greater problems with actual everyday life tasks as compared to HC. The BICAMS is a promising cognitive screening tool to predict actual functional performance in participants with MS.
Authors: Steven Paul Woods; Jennifer E Iudicello; Erin E Morgan; Marizela Verduzco; Tyler V Smith; Clint Cushman Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Nadina B Lincoln; Lucy E Bradshaw; Cris S Constantinescu; Florence Day; Avril Er Drummond; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Shaun Harris; Alan A Montgomery; Roshan das Nair Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Ralph Hb Benedict; John DeLuca; Glenn Phillips; Nicholas LaRocca; Lynn D Hudson; Richard Rudick Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Marco Aurélio G de Caneda; Daissy Liliana Mora Cuervo; Nathércia Estevam Marinho; Maria Cecília A de Vecino Journal: Dement Neuropsychol Date: 2018 Apr-Jun