Literature DB >> 26163048

If your lump is bigger than a golf ball and growing, think Sarcoma.

R Nandra1, J Forsberg2, R Grimer3.   

Abstract

AIM: Only 1 in 100 of primary care consultations regarding new soft tissue lumps (STL) are malignant and are susceptible to a delay in diagnosis. We aimed to generate a Bayesian Belief Network to estimate the likelihood of malignancy in patients to facilitate the initial evaluation of a STL and improve timing and quality of referrals to specialist treatment centres.
METHODS: We evaluated all patients referred with a new STL between 1996 and 2007. Variables investigated focused on patient factors, symptoms and STL characteristics. Relevant data was extracted and coded for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: 3018 patients with a STL were assessed, of which 1563 (52%) were benign and 1455 (48%) malignant. The features most conditionally associated with the outcome of interest (Benign or Malignant) are referred to as first-degree associates, and are increasing size, age, size of the lump, and duration of symptoms, in that order. On cross validation, this model demonstrated an AUC of 0.77 (95%C.I. 0.75-0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we have described the hierarchal relationship between factors and created an aide memoire, larger than a golf ball and growing, to trigger referral to tertiary tumor units. Importantly, we found pain to be a poor discriminatory factor. We hope our findings will lead to greater awareness and earlier diagnosis of STL.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian belief network; Golf ball; Nomogram; Sarcoma; Soft tissue lump

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26163048     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  The impact of age and sex on the diagnosis of intrinsic rectus femoris masses: A single centre experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Vidoni; Manroy Sahni; Steven L James; Rajesh Botchu; A Mark Davies
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

Review 2.  Diagnosis and Management of Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Makoto Endo; Nokitaka Setsu; Toshifumi Fujiwara; Takeaki Ishii; Makoto Nakagawa; Kenichiro Yahiro; Atsushi Kimura; Eijiro Shimada; Yasuharu Nakashima; Yoshihiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-25

3.  Tumour in a tumour: a well-differentiated spindle cell sarcoma within a forearm lipoma.

Authors:  James C R Wadkin; Sebastian Senes; Scott Evans; Jonathan Stevenson
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-10

4.  Does size reliably predict malignancy in soft tissue tumours?

Authors:  Leonhard Gruber; Alexander Loizides; Laurin Ostermann; Bernhard Glodny; Michaela Plaikner; Hannes Gruber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnosis and treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk.

Authors:  Maria Anna Smolle; Dimosthenis Andreou; Per-Ulf Tunn; Joanna Szkandera; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 6.  Soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremities: Maximizing treatment opportunities and outcomes.

Authors:  Jose Duran-Moreno; Vasileios Kontogeorgakos; Anna Koumarianou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Inadvertent Inguinal Sarcoma Excision during Hernia Surgery: Outcomes, Gender Analysis, and Prevention.

Authors:  Joshua M Lawrenz; James P Norris; Marcus C Tan; Eric T Shinohara; John J Block; Elizabeth J Davis; Vicki L Keedy; Jennifer L Halpern; Ginger E Holt; Herbert S Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Comparing Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and FNCLCC Grading to Improve Pretreatment Grading of Soft Tissue Sarcoma-A Translational Feasibility Study on Fusion Imaging.

Authors:  Madelaine Hettler; Julia Kitz; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Manuel Guhlich; Babak Panahi; Jennifer Ernst; Lena-Christin Conradi; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Jens Jakob
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Age-related sarcoma patient experience: results from a national survey in England.

Authors:  Eugenie Younger; Olga Husson; Lindsey Bennister; Jeremy Whelan; Roger Wilson; Andy Roast; Robin L Jones; Winette Ta van der Graaf
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  MRI after Whoops procedure: diagnostic value for residual sarcoma and predictive value for an incomplete second resection.

Authors:  Mohammed H A Alramdan; Ömer Kasalak; Lukas B Been; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Derya Yakar; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.