Literature DB >> 26162587

Piezoelectric materials for tissue regeneration: A review.

Amir Hossein Rajabi1, Michael Jaffe1, Treena Livingston Arinzeh2.   

Abstract

The discovery of piezoelectricity, endogenous electric fields and transmembrane potentials in biological tissues raised the question whether or not electric fields play an important role in cell function. It has kindled research and the development of technologies in emulating biological electricity for tissue regeneration. Promising effects of electrical stimulation on cell growth and differentiation and tissue growth has led to interest in using piezoelectric scaffolds for tissue repair. Piezoelectric materials can generate electrical activity when deformed. Hence, an external source to apply electrical stimulation or implantation of electrodes is not needed. Various piezoelectric materials have been employed for different tissue repair applications, particularly in bone repair, where charges induced by mechanical stress can enhance bone formation; and in neural tissue engineering, in which electric pulses can stimulate neurite directional outgrowth to fill gaps in nervous tissue injuries. In this review, a summary of piezoelectricity in different biological tissues, mechanisms through which electrical stimulation may affect cellular response, and recent advances in the fabrication and application of piezoelectric scaffolds will be discussed. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The discovery of piezoelectricity, endogenous electric fields and transmembrane potentials in biological tissues has kindled research and the development of technologies using electrical stimulation for tissue regeneration. Piezoelectric materials generate electrical activity in response to deformations and allow for the delivery of an electrical stimulus without the need for an external power source. As a scaffold for tissue engineering, growing interest exists due to its potential of providing electrical stimulation to cells to promote tissue formation. In this review, we cover the discovery of piezoelectricity in biological tissues, its connection to streaming potentials, biological response to electrical stimulation and commonly used piezoelectric materials for tissue regeneration. This review summarizes their potential as a promising scaffold in the tissue engineering field.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Piezoelectric; Scaffolds; Tissue engineering; Tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26162587     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  46 in total

Review 1.  Assessing and Mitigating the Hazard Potential of Two-Dimensional Materials.

Authors:  Linda M Guiney; Xiang Wang; Tian Xia; André E Nel; Mark C Hersam
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  Electrospinning Piezoelectric Fibers for Biocompatible Devices.

Authors:  Bahareh Azimi; Mario Milazzo; Andrea Lazzeri; Stefano Berrettini; Mohammed Jasim Uddin; Zhao Qin; Markus J Buehler; Serena Danti
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular response to biophysical cues using synthetic biology approaches.

Authors:  Denise Denning; Wouter H Roos
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Ultrasound-Induced Wireless Energy Harvesting: From Materials Strategies to Functional Applications.

Authors:  Laiming Jiang; Yang Yang; Yong Chen; Qifa Zhou
Journal:  Nano Energy       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 17.881

5.  Electroactive polymers for tissue regeneration: Developments and perspectives.

Authors:  Chengyun Ning; Zhengnan Zhou; Guoxin Tan; Ye Zhu; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 29.190

6.  Antibody-Conjugated Barium Titanate Nanoparticles for Cell-Specific Targeting.

Authors:  Tomas Jordan; Mikaela A O'Brien; Catalina-Paula Spatarelu; Geoffrey P Luke
Journal:  ACS Appl Nano Mater       Date:  2020-03-05

7.  Comparison of Methods for Surface Modification of Barium Titanate Nanoparticles for Aqueous Dispersibility: Toward Biomedical Utilization of Perovskite Oxides.

Authors:  Richard H Huang; Nicholas B Sobol; Ali Younes; Tanjeena Mamun; Jason S Lewis; Rein V Ulijn; Stephen O'Brien
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  Texturized P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane enhances bone neoformation in calvaria defects regardless of the association with photobiomodulation therapy in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Fernanda Cristina Toloi Rufato; Luiz Gustavo de Sousa; Priscilla Hakime Scalize; Rossano Gimenes; Isabela Hallak Regalo; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Fabíola Singaretti de Oliveira; Karina Fittipaldi Bombonato-Prado; Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo; Selma Siéssere
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Biomedical Implants with Charge-Transfer Monitoring and Regulating Abilities.

Authors:  Donghui Wang; Ji Tan; Hongqin Zhu; Yongfeng Mei; Xuanyong Liu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 10.  Review of Hybrid Materials Based on Polyhydroxyalkanoates for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Artyom Pryadko; Maria A Surmeneva; Roman A Surmenev
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.