Literature DB >> 26162182

General Evaluability Theory.

Christopher K Hsee1, Jiao Zhang2.   

Abstract

A central question in psychology and economics is the determination of whether individuals react differently to different values of a cared-about attribute (e.g., different income levels, different gas prices, and different ambient temperatures). Building on and significantly extending our earlier work on preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations, we propose a general evaluability theory (GET) that specifies when people are value sensitive and when people mispredict their own or others' value sensitivity. The GET can explain and unify many seemingly unrelated findings, ranging from duration neglect to affective forecasting errors and can generate many new research directions on topics ranging from temporal discounting to subjective well-being.
© The Author(s) 2010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  duration neglect; evaluation mode; preference reversal; scope sensitivity; temporal discounting

Year:  2010        PMID: 26162182     DOI: 10.1177/1745691610374586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  24 in total

1.  The subjective understanding of guideline recommendations and of the risks of the side effects of medication.

Authors:  Tilmann Betsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  When fairness matters less than we expect.

Authors:  Gus Cooney; Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: affect shifts preferences for giving.

Authors:  Alexander Genevsky; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; Brian Knutson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Large numbers cause magnitude neglect: The case of government expenditures.

Authors:  Christina Boyce-Jacino; Ellen Peters; Alison P Galvani; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Realistic affective forecasting: The role of personality.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Ben Chapman; Paul Duberstein
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-07-25

6.  Judgements of effort as a function of post-trial versus post-task elicitation.

Authors:  Michelle Ashburner; Evan F Risko
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  When less is more: evolutionary origins of the affect heuristic.

Authors:  Jerald D Kralik; Eric R Xu; Emily J Knight; Sara A Khan; William J Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Less means more for pigeons but not always.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jennifer R Laude; Jacob P Case; Carter W Daniels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

9.  Scholarship Policies of International Students in Chinese Universities: A Brand Perception Perspective.

Authors:  Nuo Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

10.  Pseudoinefficacy: negative feelings from children who cannot be helped reduce warm glow for children who can be helped.

Authors:  Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; Marcus Mayorga
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.