Literature DB >> 26161990

Global Visit Effects in Point-Wise Longitudinal Modeling of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.

Susan R Bryan1, Paul H C Eilers2, Emmanuel M E H Lesaffre3, Hans G Lemij4, Koenraad A Vermeer5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: One of the difficulties in modeling visual field (VF) data is the sometimes large and correlated measurement errors in the point-wise sensitivity estimates. As these errors affect all locations of the same VF, we propose to model them as global visit effects (GVE). We evaluate this model and show the effect it has on progression estimation and prediction.
METHODS: Visual field series (24-2 Full Threshold; 15 biannual VFs per patient) of 125 patients with primary glaucoma were included in the analysis. The contribution of the GVE was evaluated by comparing the fitting and predictive ability of a conventional model, which does not contain GVE, to such a model that incorporates the GVE. Moreover, the GVE's effect on the estimated slopes was evaluated by determining the absolute difference between the slopes of the models. Finally, the magnitude of the GVE was compared with that of other measurement errors.
RESULTS: The GVE model showed a significant improvement in both the model fit and predictive ability over the conventional model, especially when the number of VFs in a series is limited. The average absolute difference in slopes between the models was 0.13 dB/y. Lastly, the magnitude of the GVE was more than three times larger than the measureable factors combined.
CONCLUSIONS: By incorporating the GVE in the longitudinal modeling of VF data, better estimates may be obtained of the rate of progression as well as of predicted future sensitivities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26161990     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  A spatially varying change points model for monitoring glaucoma progression using visual field data.

Authors:  Samuel I Berchuck; Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren
Journal:  Spat Stat       Date:  2019-02-22

2.  Diagnosing Glaucoma Progression with Visual Field Data Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method.

Authors:  Samuel I Berchuck; Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  A New Graphical Tool for Assessing Visual Field Progression in Clinical Populations.

Authors:  Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Development of a Visual Field Simulation Model of Longitudinal Point-Wise Sensitivity Changes From a Clinical Glaucoma Cohort.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  A Method to Measure the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change.

Authors:  Joseph Caprioli; Lilian Mohamed; Esteban Morales; Alessandro Rabiolo; Nathaniel Sears; Hirunpatravong Pradtana; Reza Alizadeh; Fei Yu; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Anne L Coleman; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Improving Spatial Resolution and Test Times of Visual Field Testing Using ARREST.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; William H Morgan; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?

Authors:  Stephen R Kelly; Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences.

Authors:  Lee Jones; Tamsin Callaghan; Peter Campbell; Pete R Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Daniel S Asfaw; David F Edgar; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  UWHVF: A Real-World, Open Source Dataset of Perimetry Tests From the Humphrey Field Analyzer at the University of Washington.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Andrew Chen; Randy Lu; Cecilia S Lee; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.048

10.  Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison Between PoPLR and ANSWERS.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; Paul H Artes; Andrew Turpin; Lyne Racette
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.