Literature DB >> 26161889

The Appeal of the Brain in the Popular Press.

Diane M Beck1.   

Abstract

Since the advent of human neuroimaging, and of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, the popular press has shown an increasing interest in brain-related findings. In this article, I explore possible reasons behind this interest, including recent data suggesting that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008). I suggest that part of the allure of these data are the deceptively simply messages they afford, as well as general, but sometimes misguided, confidence in biological data. In addition to cataloging some misunderstandings by the press and public, I highlight the responsibilities of the research scientist in carefully conveying their work to the general public.
© The Author(s) 2010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; media; neuroscience; public

Year:  2010        PMID: 26161889     DOI: 10.1177/1745691610388779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mistreating Psychology in the Decades of the Brain.

Authors:  Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-11

Review 2.  Frontiers in Human Neuroscience: The Golden Triangle and Beyond.

Authors:  Jean Decety; John Cacioppo
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-11

3.  How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Cliodhna O'Connor; Helene Joffe
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2013-02-18

4.  Media reporting of neuroscience depends on timing, topic and newspaper type.

Authors:  Nienke M van Atteveldt; Sandra I van Aalderen-Smeets; Carina Jacobi; Nel Ruigrok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Im; Joo-Yun Cho; Janet M Dubinsky; Sashank Varma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece.

Authors:  Marietta Papadatou-Pastou; Eleni Haliou; Filippos Vlachos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

7.  Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.

Authors:  Andy W K Yeung; Tazuko K Goto; W Keung Leung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A pilot study of a neuroscience-based, harm minimisation programme in schools and youth centres in Australia.

Authors:  Jennifer Debenham; Louise Birrell; Katrina Champion; Mina Askovic; Nicola Newton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers.

Authors:  Sanne Dekker; Nikki C Lee; Paul Howard-Jones; Jelle Jolles
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-18

10.  The Prevalence of Pseudoscientific Ideas and Neuromyths Among Sports Coaches.

Authors:  Richard P Bailey; Daniel J Madigan; Ed Cope; Adam R Nicholls
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.