Literature DB >> 26161886

Culture and the Home-Field Disadvantage.

Douglas Medin1, Will Bennis2, Michael Chandler3.   

Abstract

The home-field disadvantage refers to the disadvantage inherent in research that takes a particular cultural group as the starting point or standard for research, including cross-cultural research. We argue that home-field status is a serious handicap that often pushes researchers toward deficit thinking, however good the researchers' intentions may be. In this article, we aim to make this home-field bias more explicit and, in doing so, more avoidable. We discuss three often-overlooked disadvantages that result from this home-field status: the problem of marked versus unmarked culture, the problem of homogenous versus heterogeneous culture, and the problem of regression toward the mean. We also recommend four interventions researchers can apply to avoid the home-field disadvantage or, at the least, attenuate its deleterious effects.
© The Author(s) 2010.

Keywords:  cross-cultural psychology; psychological distance; research bias

Year:  2010        PMID: 26161886     DOI: 10.1177/1745691610388772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  15 in total

1.  Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population.

Authors:  Mostafa Salari Rad; Alison Jane Martingano; Jeremy Ginges
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Learning from failures of protocol in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Shirajum Munira; Khaleda Jesmin; Joseph Hackman; Leonid Tiokhin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Generic language in scientific communication.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Maureen A Callanan; Graciela Solis; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study?

Authors:  Kalonji Nzinga; David N Rapp; Christopher Leatherwood; Matthew Easterday; Leoandra Onnie Rogers; Natalie Gallagher; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture.

Authors:  Laura M Brady; Stephanie A Fryberg; Yuichi Shoda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge.

Authors:  Mariano Sigman; Marcela Peña; Andrea P Goldin; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Tokenism in psychology: standing on the shoulders of small boys.

Authors:  Václav Linkov
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2014-06

8.  Polygenic risk, family cohesion, and adolescent aggression in Mexican American and European American families: Developmental pathways to alcohol use.

Authors:  Kit K Elam; Laurie Chassin; Danielle Pandika
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2018-08-31

9.  Need for Ethnic and Population Diversity in Psychosis Research.

Authors:  Carla Burkhard; Saba Cicek; Ran Barzilay; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Sinan Guloksuz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  The cultural constitution of cognition: taking the anthropological perspective.

Authors:  Andrea Bender; Sieghard Beller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.