Literature DB >> 26161760

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis of the Hip Fares Worse Than THA for Primary Osteoarthritis.

Sonya Khurana, Tamar B Nobel, Justin S Merkow, Michael Walsh, Kenneth A Egol1.   

Abstract

We conducted a study to evaluate differences between patients who had total hip arthroplasty (THA) for posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) and patients who had THA for primary OA. Using a prospective database, we followed 3844 patients who had THA for OA. Those who had THA for secondary causes of hip OA, developmental hip dysplasia, or inflammatory processes were excluded. Of the remaining 1199 patients, 62 (63 fractures) had THA for posttraumatic OA after previous acetabular or proximal femur fracture fixation, and 1137 had THA for primary OA and served as the control group. In the posttraumatic OA group, mean time between fracture repair and conversion to THA was 74 months. Compared with the control patients, the posttrauma patients lost more blood, were transfused more units of blood, had longer operating room times, and had more complications (all Ps < .001). Posttrauma patients had a mean follow-up of 4.44 years and a mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score of 81.3 at latest follow-up. Of these patients, 12.5% required revision a mean of 3.5 years after initial arthroplasty. THA in patients with posttraumatic hip OA after an acetabular or proximal femur fracture is a longer and more complicated procedure with a higher rate of early failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26161760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of two different stems for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedram Yavari; Bahareh Baghchi; Mehdi Tavassoli; Pouya Moshkdar; Sepehr Eslami; Amirhossein Sadeghian; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients.

Authors:  Sandrine Colas; Assia Allalou; Antoine Poichotte; Philippe Piriou; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Single-stage total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures: an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infections?

Authors:  P Hemmann; F Schmidutz; M D Ahrend; S G Yan; U Stöckle; A J Schreiner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis following acetabular fracture: A systematic review of characteristics, outcomes, and complications.

Authors:  Robert D Stibolt; Harshadkumar A Patel; Samuel R Huntley; Eva J Lehtonen; Ashish B Shah; Sameer M Naranje
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-26

5.  One-Stage Arthroplasty or Revision for Seronegative Infections in Hip and Knee.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Wang; Rui Zhang Md; Ze-Yu Luo; Duan Wang Md PhD; Fu-Xing Pei; Xin Tang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  The anterior approach for conversion hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph S Gondusky; Jeong H Lee
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-06-20

7.  The effect of previous acetabular fractures on total hip arthroplasty outcomes: A matched-controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Lihong Wang; Pengfei Li; Jiangcui Kou; Changqing Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.