| Literature DB >> 26161540 |
Karen D Lupo1, Dave N Schmitt1, Christopher A Kiahtipes1, Jean-Paul Ndanga2, D Craig Young3, Bernard Simiti2.
Abstract
An ongoing question in paleoenvironmental reconstructions of the central African rainforest concerns the role that prehistoric metallurgy played in shaping forest vegetation. Here we report evidence of intensive iron-ore mining and smelting in forested regions of the northern Congo Basin dating to the late Holocene. Volumetric estimates on extracted iron-ore and associated slag mounds from prehistoric sites in the southern Central African Republic suggest large-scale iron production on par with other archaeological and historically-known iron fabrication areas. These data document the first evidence of intensive iron mining and production spanning approximately 90 years prior to colonial occupation (circa AD 1889) and during an interval of time that is poorly represented in the archaeological record. Additional site areas pre-dating these remains by 3-4 centuries reflect an earlier period of iron production on a smaller scale. Microbotanical evidence from a sediment core collected from an adjacent riparian trap shows a reduction in shade-demanding trees in concert with an increase in light-demanding species spanning the time interval associated with iron intensification. This shift occurs during the same time interval when many portions of the Central African witnessed forest transgressions associated with a return to moister and more humid conditions beginning 500-100 years ago. Although data presented here do not demonstrate that iron smelting activities caused widespread vegetation change in Central Africa, we argue that intense mining and smelting can have localized and potentially regional impacts on vegetation communities. These data further demonstrate the high value of pairing archeological and paleoenvironmental analyses to reconstruct regional-scale forest histories.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26161540 PMCID: PMC4498739 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the project area in the eastern NGotto Forest Reserve, southern Central African Republic.
Archaeological site locations (labeled) are marked with black dots/ovals and the location of the sediment core (FC400) is marked with an open circle.
Selected attributes of archaeological sites discovered in the Bagbaya vicinity.
| Site | Type | Location | Contents | Test excavation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB01 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | CE, CH, FP, PN, SG | + |
| BB02 | Slag mound | Agricultural field | FP, SG | - |
| BB03 | Slag mound | Agricultural field | CE, CH, FP, SG | + |
| BB04 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | SG | - |
| BB05 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | CE, CH, FP, PN, SG | + |
| BB06 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | SG | - |
| BB07 | Slag mound | Agricultural field | FP, SG | - |
| BB08 | Ore cluster | Secondary forest | IR | - |
| BB09 | Slag mound | Agricultural field | FP, SG | - |
| BB10 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | FP, SG | - |
| BB11 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | FP, SG | - |
| BB12 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | FP, PN, SG | - |
| BB13/14 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | FP, SG | - |
| BB15 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | SG | - |
| ND01 | Ore exposure/quarry | Secondary forest | CE, CH, FP, IR | + |
| ND02 | Slag mound | Secondary forest | CH, FP, SG | + |
| ND03 | Ore exposure/quarry | Secondary forest | IR | - |
| NG01 | Slag mound | Sec. forest-agricult. field | CE, CH, FP, SG | + |
| NG02 | Slag mound | Sec. forest-agricult. field | FP, SG | - |
| NZ complex | Low mounds | Wet savanna | CE, CH, FP, QZ, SG | + |
| OB complex | Slag mounds and low mounds | Secondary forest and wet savanna | CE, CH, FP, SG | + |
aCE = ceramic pottery sherds; CH = charcoal; FP = furnace pipe (tuyère) fragments; IR = iron ore; PN = palm nuts; QZ = quartz cobbles/spall; SG = slag.
bTest excavations were undertaken at the entrance (dripline) of the Feature E adit and along the western edge of Feature G.
cFive low mound features were observed; Features NZ03 and NZ05 were subject to test excavations.
dIncludes two slag mounds (OB01-02) in secondary forest and 10 low mound features (OB03-12) in the neighboring wet savanna. Features OB01, 02, 05, and 06 were subject to test excavations.
Fig 2General plan of the southern Ndanga Mines (ND01), Features A-G.
Fig 3View south/southeast of the Feature E cavern at ND01; photo by KD Lupo.
Radiocarbon dates and calibrated (2-sigma) calendrical age estimates on charcoal from sites in the Bagbaya vicinity.
| Site | FS no. | Lab no. | Depth (cm) below surface | 14C age | Calibrated age BP | Calibrated age AD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB01 | 30 | AA94530 | 90 | 168 ± 35 | 291–0 | 1804 |
| BB01 | 31 | AA94531 | 112 | 207 ± 35 | 309–0 | 1795 |
| BB01 | 29 | AA94529 | 50 | 215 ± 34 | 310–0 | 1795 |
| BB03 | 36 | AA94532 | 24 | 148 ± 34 | 283–0 | 1808 |
| BB05 | 41 | AA94534 | 61 | 187 ± 34 | 302–0 | 1799 |
| BB05 | 32 | AA94533 | 24 | 231 ± 34 | 317–144 | 1719 |
| ND01 | 3 | AA94537 | 55 | 160 ± 35 | 286–0 | 1797 |
| ND02 | 76 | AA94538 | 74 | 242 ± 34 | 428–145 | 1664 |
| NG01 | 74 | AA94539 | 60 | 217 ± 48 | 324–0 | 1788 |
| NZ03 | 17 | AA94541 | 27 | 494 ± 34 | 553–498 | 1424 |
| NZ03 | 12 | AA94542 | 33 | 593 ± 34 | 653–538 | 1354 |
| NZ03 | 23 | AA94540 | 29 | 706 ± 35 | 698–562 | 1320 |
| OB01 | 67 | AA94543 | 33 | 152 ± 35 | 284–0 | 1808 |
| OB02 | 49 | AA94544 | 25 | 210 ± 34 | 308–0 | 1796 |
| OB05 | 54 | AA94546 | 25 | 131 ± 34 | 279–8 | 1806 |
| OB05 | 53 | AA94545 | 22 | 188 ± 39 | 304–0 | 1798 |
| OB06 | 63 | AA94547 | 28 | 131 ± 34 | 279–8 | 1806 |
aField specimen number.
bAll samples were assayed at the Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson.
cAge midpoint.
dSouthern Ndanga Mines, Feature E.
Fig 4East wall excavation profile in the BB01 slag mound.
This profile illustrates the structure typical of most excavated mounds. Radiocarbon dates (cal mid): 1) AD 1795; 2) AD 1795; 3) AD 1804 (see Table 2).
Measurements and approximate slag volumes and weights from a sample of slag mounds in the Bagbaya vicinity.
| Site | Length (m) | Width (m) | Height (m) | Surface area (m2) | Volume (m3) | Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BB01 | 18 | 14 | 1.50 | 189 | 98 | 109,760 |
| BB04 | 17 | 16 | 2.00 | 204 | 163 | 182,560 |
| BB05 | 17 | 20 | 1.75 | 255 | 154 | 172,480 |
| BB07 | 12 | 8 | 1.50 | 72 | 39 | 42,680 |
| BB09 | 14 | 14 | 1.25 | 147 | 62 | 69,440 |
| BB10 | 20 | 16 | 2.50 | 240 | 208 | 232,960 |
| NG01 | 12 | 12 | 1.75 | 108 | 63 | 70,560 |
| OB02 | 14 | 12 | 1.50 | 126 | 62 | 69,440 |
| Means | 16 | 14 | 1.72 | 168 | 106 | 118,720 |
aTruncated cone volume (π × h × [R2 + r2 + R × r]/3) multiplied by .80 as sand, roots, etcetera in the tested mounds make up approximately 20% of the matrix.
bBased on an air-cooled iron slag weight of 1120 kg/m3 [cf. 56].
Fig 5The relative percent of pollen summations in the FC400 sediment samples represented by vegetation types across three broad groups.
Fig 6Ages and pollen and charcoal concentrations for the five core samples.
A: Plot of pollen, charcoal, and charcoal-pollen ratios as Z-scores. B: Plot of absolute dates and estimated age ranges. Estimates were derived from absolute dates and closely match shifts in pollen concentrations.
Comparisons of reported slag volumes in late Holocene sites in West Africa.
| Site | Total volume (m3) | Span of years | 100 yr. rate (m3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bassar (Period 2) | 13,260 | AD 1300–1600 (300 yr.) | 4420 |
| Bassar (Period 2) | 40,893 | AD 1550–1800 (350 yr.) | 11,684 |
| Bassar (period 3) | 28,172 | AD 1800–1925 (125 yr.) | 22,538 |
| Dapaa | 1962 | AD 1400–1700 (300 yr.) | 654 |
| Ndop Plain | 163,000–133,000 | AD ~1800’s (100 yr.) | 163,000–133,000 |
| Bagbaya | 2015–5,300 | AD 1719–1808 (~100 yr.) | 2015–5300 |
aNorthern Togo [56].
bGhana [26].
cCameroon [91, 92].
dCentral African Republic (this study). The smaller value of 2015 m3 reflects a volumetric estimate for the 19 mounds reported here. The larger value of 5,300 m3 is an estimate of slag for 50 mounds assuming the average mound size is 106 m3.