Literature DB >> 26161429

Cellular plasticity regulated cancer stem cell niche: a possible new mechanism of chemoresistance.

Marc Deheeger1, Maciej S Lesniak2, Atique U Ahmed2.   

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) theory is an emerging concept that proposes a hierarchical nature of carcinogenesis, where a small number of tumor cells are capable of driving tumor growth. Despite many unanswered questions surrounding the cancer stem cell model, the hypothesis has rejuvenated hopes for formulating a novel therapeutic strategy for targeting the roots of cancer. This model predicts that cancer stem cells have the capacity to resist conventional radio- and chemotherapy and initiate disease recurrence. We recently investigated the mechanisms of chemoresistance in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive adult human brain tumor. Exposure of patient derived glioma xenograft lines to a therapeutic dose of temolozolomide (TMZ), the most commonly used chemotherapy for patients with GBM, consistently increased the glioma stem cell (GSC) frequency over time. Lineage tracing analysis at the single sell level revealed unprecedented cellular plasticity within the glioma cells, allowing them to reprogram from a differentiated state to an undifferentiated CSC-like state. This reprogramming, mediated by cellular plasticity, is driven by TMZ-induced hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs), and provides a novel mechanism for chemoresistance acquisition. We herein discuss the possible role of temozolomide in regulating a cancer stem cell niche that supports GSC resistance, proliferation, and subsequent therapeutic relapse.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26161429      PMCID: PMC4494756          DOI: 10.14800/ccm.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cell Microenviron


  31 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality?

Authors:  Piyush B Gupta; Christine L Chaffer; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Acidic stress promotes a glioma stem cell phenotype.

Authors:  A B Hjelmeland; Q Wu; J M Heddleston; G S Choudhary; J MacSwords; J D Lathia; R McLendon; D Lindner; A Sloan; J N Rich
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells.

Authors:  Toshihiko Ezashi; Padmalaya Das; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Hypoxia-mediated drug resistance: novel insights on the functional interaction of HIFs and cell death pathways.

Authors:  Nadine Rohwer; Thorsten Cramer
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 18.500

5.  The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype.

Authors:  John M Heddleston; Zhizhong Li; Roger E McLendon; Anita B Hjelmeland; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells.

Authors:  Zhizhong Li; Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Hui Wang; Christine Eyler; Sith Sathornsumetee; Qing Shi; Yiting Cao; Justin Lathia; Roger E McLendon; Anita B Hjelmeland; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Hypoxia and HIF1alpha repress the differentiative effects of BMPs in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Francesca Pistollato; Hui-Ling Chen; Brian R Rood; Hui-Zhen Zhang; Domenico D'Avella; Luca Denaro; Marina Gardiman; Geertruy te Kronnie; Philip H Schwartz; Elena Favaro; Stefano Indraccolo; Giuseppe Basso; David M Panchision
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Ineffectiveness of doxorubicin treatment on solitary dormant mammary carcinoma cells or late-developing metastases.

Authors:  George N Naumov; Jason L Townson; Ian C MacDonald; Sylvia M Wilson; Vivien H C Bramwell; Alan C Groom; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Correlation of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with clinical outcomes in glioblastoma and clinical strategies to modulate MGMT activity.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Lili Liu; James G Herman; Roger Stupp; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Minesh P Mehta; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Characterization and functional analysis of a slow cycling stem cell-like subpopulation in pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dembinski; Stefan Krauss
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.150

View more
  8 in total

1.  Temporal stability of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients undergoing STUPP protocol.

Authors:  C J O'Regan; H Kearney; A Beausang; M A Farrell; F M Brett; J B Cryan; T E Loftus; P G Buckley
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Dedifferentiation of Glioma Cells to Glioma Stem-like Cells By Therapeutic Stress-induced HIF Signaling in the Recurrent GBM Model.

Authors:  Gina Lee; Brenda Auffinger; Donna Guo; Tanwir Hasan; Marc Deheeger; Alex L Tobias; Jeong Yeon Kim; Fatemeh Atashi; Lingjiao Zhang; Maciej S Lesniak; C David James; Atique U Ahmed
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Dormant glioblastoma cells acquire stem cell characteristics and are differentially affected by Temozolomide and AT101 treatment.

Authors:  Kirsten Hattermann; Janka Held-Feindt; Vivian Adamski; Annika Hempelmann; Charlotte Flüh; Ralph Lucius; Michael Synowitz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-18

4.  The Expression of Connexins and SOX2 Reflects the Plasticity of Glioma Stem-Like Cells.

Authors:  Joana Balça-Silva; Diana Matias; Luiz Gustavo Dubois; Brenno Carneiro; Anália do Carmo; Henrique Girão; Fernanda Ferreira; Valeria Pereira Ferrer; Leila Chimelli; Paulo Niemeyer Filho; Hermínio Tão; Olinda Rebelo; Marcos Barbosa; Ana Bela Sarmento-Ribeiro; Maria Celeste Lopes; Vivaldo Moura-Neto
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Shyambabu Chaurasiya; Nanhai G Chen; Susanne G Warner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Recurrent Glioblastomas Exhibit Higher Expression of Biomarkers with Stem-like Properties.

Authors:  B N Nandeesh; Sharmistha Naskar; Arun H Shashtri; A Arivazhagan; Vani Santosh
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  When fats commit crimes: fatty acid metabolism, cancer stemness and therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Ching-Ying Kuo; David K Ann
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-11

8.  The Metabolic Inhibitor CPI-613 Negates Treatment Enrichment of Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chiara Bellio; Celeste DiGloria; David R Spriggs; Rosemary Foster; Whitfield B Growdon; Bo R Rueda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.