Kyung Mi Kim1, Hyunjin Oh2. 1. Department of Nursing, Semyung University, Jecheon, South Korea. 2. College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea. Electronic address: hyunjino@gachon.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: During clinical placements, nursing students who come into close contact with patients and provide nursing interventions may be exposed to harmful pathogens. However, little is known about nursing students' experiences with standard precautions (SP) in clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted interviews with six focus groups of nursing students (n = 38) from two universities in South Korea. The focus group interviews each took 90-120 minutes and included 6-7 participants from two different universities. The meetings used semi-structured interview protocols. Qualitative content analysis was employed. RESULTS: Four themes and 9 subthemes were identified: (a) attitudes (knowledge deficit, sensitivity), (b) subjective norms (negative role models, classroom and in-field gaps, blind spots), (c) perceived behavioral control (psychological barriers, physical barriers, lack of information), and (d) intention (changes in compliance awareness). CONCLUSIONS: These focus groups revealed that many nursing students worked in vulnerable environments and risked pathogen exposure. Nursing students expressed the importance of SP but reported witnessing many instances of failure to comply with established measures. Several barriers were explored as reasons of SP noncompliance. By removing the barriers presented in this study, nursing students would be able to perform their duties in a safe clinical environment.
PURPOSE: During clinical placements, nursing students who come into close contact with patients and provide nursing interventions may be exposed to harmful pathogens. However, little is known about nursing students' experiences with standard precautions (SP) in clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted interviews with six focus groups of nursing students (n = 38) from two universities in South Korea. The focus group interviews each took 90-120 minutes and included 6-7 participants from two different universities. The meetings used semi-structured interview protocols. Qualitative content analysis was employed. RESULTS: Four themes and 9 subthemes were identified: (a) attitudes (knowledge deficit, sensitivity), (b) subjective norms (negative role models, classroom and in-field gaps, blind spots), (c) perceived behavioral control (psychological barriers, physical barriers, lack of information), and (d) intention (changes in compliance awareness). CONCLUSIONS: These focus groups revealed that many nursing students worked in vulnerable environments and risked pathogen exposure. Nursing students expressed the importance of SP but reported witnessing many instances of failure to comply with established measures. Several barriers were explored as reasons of SP noncompliance. By removing the barriers presented in this study, nursing students would be able to perform their duties in a safe clinical environment.
Authors: Pedro Parreira; Paulo Santos-Costa; João Pardal; Teresa Neves; Rafael A Bernardes; Beatriz Serambeque; Liliana B Sousa; João Graveto; Marja Silén-Lipponen; Ulla Korhonen; Leena Koponen; Mikko Myllymäki; Amaia Yurrebaso Macho; Alexander L Ward Mayens; Eva Maria Picado Valverde; Raquel Guzmán Ordaz; Juan Antonio Juanes Méndez; Jose Luis Pérez Iglesias; José Antonio Mirón Canelo; Aleksandra Jankowiak-Bernaciak; Amelia Patrzała; Grażyna Bączyk; Anna Basa; Alcinda Maria do Sacramento Costa Reis; Joaquim Augusto Simões; Ana Luísa Torres; Maria do Rosário Pinto; Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-01-28