Literature DB >> 26159975

Revolution vs status quo? Non-intervention strategy of asymptomatic third molars causes harm.

V Toedtling1, J M Yates1.   

Abstract

The Faculty of Dental Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of England has prompted the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to urgently re-assess the TA1 guidance on extractions of wisdom teeth and highlighted required amendments to the present version in light of published evidence concerning the harm caused by wisdom tooth retention. This article seeks to address the recent concerns relating the increasing frequency of distal-cervical caries in lower second molar teeth when associated with asymptomatic partially erupted mesial or horizontal impacted mandibular third molars. Such acute angle impactions are classified as partially erupted when one of the third molar cusps breached the epithelial attachment of the distal aspect of the second molar, thus prevents the formation of a gingival seal. At its earliest stage the wisdom tooth appears clinically absent or unerupted, yet histologically the architecture of the gingival epithelium has been disrupted allowing ingress of microbes, demineralisation and succeeding cavitation to take place on the distal aspect of the second molar. We hope to highlight the difficulties faced in addressing this growing clinical problem and encourage clinicians to re-evaluate their own caries risk assessment and caries prevention strategy in relation to mesial and horizontal third molar extractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26159975     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  3 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth.

Authors:  F Song; S O'Meara; P Wilson; S Golder; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Dentists' use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Valeria V Gordan; Craig T Ajmo; Hildegunn Bockman; Marlon B Jackson; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.383

3.  Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of third molar teeth? Update.

Authors:  Louis W McArdle; Fraser McDonald; Judith Jones
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 1.651

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Distal caries of the second molar in the presence of a mandibular third molar - a prevention protocol.

Authors:  V Toedtling; P Coulthard; G Thackray
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.626

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.