| Literature DB >> 26159770 |
Vineeta Singh1, Vandana Praveen2, Divya Tripathi3, Shafiul Haque4, Pallavi Somvanshi5, S B Katti6, C K M Tripathi2.
Abstract
During the search for a potent antifungal drug, a cell-permeable metabolite was isolated from a soil isolate taxonomically identified as Penicillium radicum. The strain was found to be a potent antifungal agent. Production conditions of the active compound were optimized and the active compound was isolated, purified, characterized and identified as a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, commonly known as wortmannin (Wtmn). This is very first time we are reporting the production of Wtmn from P. radicum. In addition to its previously discovered anticancer properties, the broad spectrum antifungal property of Wtmn was re-confirmed using various fungal strains. Virtual screening was performed through molecular docking studies against potential antifungal targets, and it was found that Wtmn was predicted to impede the actions of these targets more efficiently than known antifungal compounds such as voriconazole and nikkomycin i.e. 1) mevalonate-5-diphosphate decarboxylase (1FI4), responsible for sterol/isoprenoid biosynthesis; 2) exocyst complex component SEC3 (3A58) where Rho- and phosphoinositide-dependent localization is present and 3) Kre2p/Mnt1p a Golgi alpha1,2-mannosyltransferase (1S4N) involved in the biosynthesis of yeast cell wall glycoproteins). We conclude that Wtmn produced from P. radicum is a promising lead compound which could be potentially used as an efficient antifungal drug in the near future after appropriate structural modifications to reduce toxicity and improve stability.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26159770 PMCID: PMC4498184 DOI: 10.1038/srep11948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Biochemical properties of the isolated strain.
| 1 | Growth on different medium | |
| Glycerol Nitrate Agar (GNA) | Thin light brown, conidia absent | |
| Malt Extract Agar (MEA) | light yellow with yellowish green conidia | |
| Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) | Olive green with olive green conidia | |
| Czapek’s Dox + Yeast Extract Agar (CYA) | Floccose, bright yellow with greenish yellow conidia | |
| Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) | Floccose, white with yellowish conidia | |
| Corn Meal Agar (CMA) | Floccose, pale white with dark yellow conidia | |
| Oat Meal Agar (OMA) | Thin mat like light brown, conidia absent | |
| Glucose-yeast extract-malt extract (GYM) Agar | Velutinous, cream coloured with dirty yellow conidia | |
| 2 | Enzyme production | |
| Urease | Positive | |
| Protease | Positive | |
| Tyrosinase | Positive | |
| Amylase | Positive | |
| Chitinase | Negative | |
| Esterase | Positive | |
| Lipase | Negative | |
| 3. | Citrate utilization | Negative |
| 4. | Milk coagulation | Positive |
| 5. | Sensitivity for antifungal drugs | |
| Kt100 | R | |
| Ap100 | R | |
| Ns100 | R | |
| It100 | R | |
| Fu100 | R | |
| Ec100 | S | |
| Mc100 | S |
Note: Kt: Ketoconazole; Ap: Amphotericin B; Ns: Nystatin; It: Itraconozole; Fu: Fluconzole; Ec: Econazole-nitrate; Mc: Miconazole.
Figure 1Phylogenetic relationship between Penicillium radicum [SF] and other Penicillium sp. 2.
Figure 2Fermentation profile of Penicillium radicum.
Antifungal activity of Wtmn isolated from Penicillium radicum MTCC 7584.
| 1 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | |
| 2 | 3.13 ± 0.44 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 10.2 ± 0.72 | |
| 3 | 1.56 ± 0.22 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 4 | 12.5 ± 1.76 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 25 ± 1.76 | |
| 5 | 1.56 ± 0.22 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 6 | 12.5 ± 1.76 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | 25 ± 1.76 | |
| 7 | 1.56 ± 0.22 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 8 | 1.56 ± 0.22 | 3.13 ± 0.22 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | |
| 9 | 3.13 ± 0.44 | 3.13 ± 0.22 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | |
| 10 | 0.78 ± 0.11 | 2.5 ± 0.17 | 5.0 ± 0.35 | |
| 11 | 10 ± 1.41 | 1.25 ± 0.08 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 12 | 0.5 ± 0.07 | 1.25 ± 0.08 | 10 ± 0.70 | |
| 13 | 12.5 ± 1.76 | 2.5 ± 0.17 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 14 | 25 ± 3.53 | 5.0 ± 0.35 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 15 | 3.13 ± 0.44 | 3.13 ± 0.22 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | |
| 16 | 10 ± 1.41 | 5.0 ± 0.35 | 12.5 ± 0.88 | |
| 17 | 5.0 ± 0.70 | 5.0 ± 0.35 | 25 ± 1.76 | |
| 18 | 1.56 ± 0.22 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 6.25 ± 0.44 | |
Cytotoxic activity of various compounds against various cancerous cell lines.
| SF (Wtmn) | 10 | 49 ± 0.71 | − | 74 ± 1.41 | 76 ± 1.41 |
| SF (Wtmn) | 30 | 52 ± 1.41 | − | 91 ± 2.12 | 89 ± 2.82 |
| Actinomycin D | 10 | 66 ± 2.83 | 68 ± 0.71 | 70 ± 0.71 | 69 ± 0.71 |
| Actinomycin D | 30 | 82 ± 1.41 | 87 ± 0.71 | 72 ± 1.76 | 98 ± 2.12 |
| Mito-C | 3.34 | 82 ± 0.71 | 87 ± 0.71 | − | 86 ± 2.47 |
| Adriamycin | 0.54 | 79 ± 0.71 | 89 ± 1.41 | − | 22 ± 2.12 |
| 5-Fu | 6.12 | − | − | 27 ± 1.41 | 15 ± 2.12 |
Note: (−): No activity
Various drugs used in the in-silico docking studies.
The interaction energies (kcal/mol) of antifungal compounds with protein using AutoDock.
| Wortmannin | −6.01 | −7.69 | −0.44 | −7.25 | 1.25 | 65.866 | |
| Voriconazole | −4.88 | −5.73 | 0.70 | −6.43 | 1.56 | 60.273 | |
| Nikkomycin | −3.43 | −6.27 | −0.04 | −6.23 | 2.80 | 63.640 | |
| pyridobenzimidazole | −7.88 | −10.24 | −0.18 | −10.06 | 2.18 | 67.175 | |
| Wortmannin | −7.28 | −8.86 | −0.34 | −8.53 | 1.25 | 72.258 | |
| Voriconazole | −5.22 | −5.67 | 1.11 | −6.78 | 1.56 | 75.792 | |
| Nikkomycin | −4.83 | −7.79 | −0.15 | −7.63 | 2.80 | 73.499 | |
| pyridobenzimidazole | −19.81 | −22.36 | −0.37 | −21.99 | 2.18 | 76.745 | |
| Wortmannin | −5.48 | −6.70 | 0.02 | −6.73 | 1.25 | 67.693 | |
| Voriconazole | −6.29 | −6.34 | 1.56 | −7.85 | 1.56 | 89.860 | |
| Nikkomycin | −3.06 | −5.89 | −0.03 | −5.86 | 2.81 | 83.461 | |
| pyridobenzimidazole | −5.83 | −8.41 | −0.40 | −8.01 | 2.18 | 85.983 |
Predicted amino acid residues in protein templates using molecular docking methods.
| Wortmannin | SER-258 | THR262, SER258, MSE255, VAL229, LEU221 | |
| Voriconazole | ALA303 | ASP205, ALA303, GLY304, ASP201, GLY 112, SER 207 | |
| Wortmannin | SER382,TYR380 | SER382, TYR380, HIS379, ILE378, LEU431, GLN429 | |
| Pyridobenzimidazole | SER382 | ASP383, HIS379, GLU396, TYR426, LEU431, SER382 | |
| Wortmannin | ASN106,CYS93 | GLU103, ASP98, CYS93, LYS100, ASN106 | |
| Nikkomycin | ARG96,CYS93 | ARG96, PRO105, GLU103, ASP98, ILE166, CYS92, ASP98 |
Figure 3Docked conformations of Inhibitors in Red (AutoDock) and Green (FlexiDock) with respect to crystal structure ligand in blue.
(a) Wortmannin (b) Voriconazole (c) Pyridobenzimidazole.
Figure 4Root mean squared deviations (RMSD) between - (a) Wortmannin and backbone atoms of Protein structure (PDB ID: 1S4N) (b) Pyridobenzimidazole and backbone atoms of Protein structure (PDB ID: 1FI4) (c) Voriconazole and backbone atoms of Protein structure (PDB ID: 3A58).
Comparative docking energies (AutoDock & FlexiDock) of antifungal drugs and their interaction with the active site.
| 1FI4 | Wortmannin | −7.69 | −697.214 | Ser 258 |
| Voriconazole | −5.73 | −505.913 | Ala 303 | |
| Nikkomycin | −6.27 | −498.682 | Arg 96 | |
| Pyriobenzimidazole | −10.24 | −712.429 | Ser 382 | |
| 1S4N | Wortmannin | −8.99 | −358.968 | Ser 358 |
| Voriconazole | −9.20 | −412.359 | Ala 303, Asp205 | |
| Nikkomycin | −8.92 | −406.322 | Arg 96, Cys 93 | |
| Pyriobenzimidazole | −22.36 | −908.254 | Ser 382, Asp 383 | |
| 3A58 | Wortmannin | −6.70 | −294.647 | Asp 214, Val 78 |
| Voriconazole | −6.34 | −532.144 | Asp 34,Val 78 | |
| Nikkomycin | −5.89 | −438.214 | Asp 214,Ser 218 | |
| Pyriobenzimidazole | −8.41 | −798.385 | Asp 383, Asp 383 |