Literature DB >> 26159687

Realistic glottal motion and airflow rate during human breathing.

Adam Scheinherr1, Lucie Bailly2, Olivier Boiron3, Aude Lagier4, Thierry Legou5, Marine Pichelin6, Georges Caillibotte6, Antoine Giovanni4.   

Abstract

The glottal geometry is a key factor in the aerosol delivery efficiency for treatment of lung diseases. However, while glottal vibrations were extensively studied during human phonation, the realistic glottal motion during breathing is poorly understood. Therefore, most current studies assume an idealized steady glottis in the context of respiratory dynamics, and thus neglect the flow unsteadiness related to this motion. This is particularly important to assess the aerosol transport mechanisms in upper airways. This article presents a clinical study conducted on 20 volunteers, to examine the realistic glottal motion during several breathing tasks. Nasofibroscopy was used to investigate the glottal geometrical variations simultaneously with accurate airflow rate measurements. In total, 144 breathing sequences of 30s were recorded. Regarding the whole database, two cases of glottal time-variations were found: "static" or "dynamic" ones. Typically, the peak value of glottal area during slow breathing narrowed from 217 ± 54 mm(2) (mean ± STD) during inspiration, to 178 ± 35 mm(2) during expiration. Considering flow unsteadiness, it is shown that the harmonic approximation of the airflow rate underevaluates the inertial effects as compared to realistic patterns, especially at the onset of the breathing cycle. These measurements provide input data to conduct realistic numerical simulations of laryngeal airflow and particle deposition.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airflow rate; Glottis; Inhalation; Laryngoscopy; Respiration; Unsteadiness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26159687     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  Validating Whole-Airway CFD Predictions of DPI Aerosol Deposition at Multiple Flow Rates.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Navvab Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.849

2.  Ideal Particle Sizes for Inhaled Steroids Targeting Vocal Granulomas: Preliminary Study Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Perkins; Saikat Basu; Guilherme J M Garcia; Robert A Buckmire; Rupali N Shah; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Use of computational fluid dynamics deposition modeling in respiratory drug delivery.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Karl Bass; Rabijit Dutta; Vijaya Rani; Morgan L Thomas; Ahmad El-Achwah; Michael Hindle
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.648

4.  Pre- and Postoperative Ultrasound and MRI Examinations in Assessing Vocal Folds in Patients with Goiter.

Authors:  Magdalena Derlatka-Kochel; Paweł Kumoniewski; Marcin Majos; Kamil Ludwisiak; Lech Pomorski; Agata Majos
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  The effect of airway motion and breathing phase during imaging on CFD simulations of respiratory airflow.

Authors:  Chamindu C Gunatilaka; Andreas Schuh; Nara S Higano; Jason C Woods; Alister J Bates
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Numerical study of dynamic glottis and tidal breathing on respiratory sounds in a human upper airway model.

Authors:  Jinxiang Xi; Zhaoxuan Wang; Khaled Talaat; Carri Glide-Hurst; Haibo Dong
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Patient-specific modeling of aerosol delivery in healthy and asthmatic adults.

Authors:  Kamran Poorbahrami; David G Mummy; Sean B Fain; Jessica M Oakes
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  The role of anisotropic expansion for pulmonary acinar aerosol deposition.

Authors:  Philipp Hofemeier; Josué Sznitman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.