Literature DB >> 26159504

Optimising filtering parameters for a 3D motion analysis system.

Sander Schreven1, Peter J Beek2, Jeroen B J Smeets2.   

Abstract

In the analysis of movement data it is common practice to use a low-pass filter in order to reduce measurement noise. However, the choice of a cut-off frequency is typically rather arbitrary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new method to find the optimal cut-off frequency for filtering kinematic data. In particular, we propose to use rigid marker clusters to determine the dynamic precision of a given 3D motion analysis system, and to use this precision as criterion to find the optimal cut-off frequency for filtering the data. We tested this method using a model-based approach in a situation in which measurement noise is a serious concern, namely the registration of the kinematics of swimming using a video-based motion analysis system. For the model data we found that filtering the data with a single cutoff frequency of 6Hz under some conditions decreased the accuracy of the reconstruction of the kinematics compared to using the unfiltered data. If the cut-off frequency was used that yielded optimal dynamic precision, then the accuracy improved by 29% compared to using raw data irrespective of the cluster position, close to the optimal accuracy improvement of 30%. We confirmed in an experiment that the cut-off frequency at which optimal precision was found varied between cluster positions and subjects, similar to the results obtained with the model. We conclude that 3D motion analysis systems can be made more accurate by optimising the cut-off frequency used in filtering the data with regard to their precision. Furthermore, the dynamic precision method seems useful to evaluate the effect of various filtering procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accuracy; Cut-off frequency; Dynamic precision; Filter frequency; Filtering; Front crawl; Kinematics; Motion analysis; Movement analysis; Movement data; Noise; Optimal dynamic precision method; Swimming

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26159504     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  11 in total

1.  Measuring motion-to-photon latency for sensorimotor experiments with virtual reality systems.

Authors:  Matthew Warburton; Mark Mon-Williams; Faisal Mushtaq; J Ryan Morehead
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-10

2.  The Kinematic and Kinetic Responses of the Trunk and Lower Extremity Joints during Walking with and without the Spinal Orthosis.

Authors:  Chenyan Wang; Xiaona Li; Yuan Guo; Weijin Du; Hongmei Guo; Weiyi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Kinematics of the head and associated vertebral artery length changes during high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical spine manipulation.

Authors:  Lindsay M Gorrell; Gregor Kuntze; Janet L Ronsky; Ryan Carter; Bruce Symons; John J Triano; Walter Herzog
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Postural responses to target jumps and background motion in a fast pointing task.

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Eli Brenner; Jacques Duysens; Sabine Verschueren; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is the manual following response an attempt to compensate for inferred self-motion?

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Eli Brenner; Jacques Duysens; Sabine Verschueren; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Systematic Comparison of the Influence of Different Data Preprocessing Methods on the Performance of Gait Classifications Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Johannes Burdack; Fabian Horst; Sven Giesselbach; Ibrahim Hassan; Sabrina Daffner; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  Quantifying normal and parkinsonian gait features from home movies: Practical application of a deep learning-based 2D pose estimator.

Authors:  Kenichiro Sato; Yu Nagashima; Tatsuo Mano; Atsushi Iwata; Tatsushi Toda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  3D trunk orientation measured using inertial measurement units during anatomical and dynamic sports motions.

Authors:  Niels P Brouwer; Ted Yeung; Maarten F Bobbert; Thor F Besier
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Sprint Performance in Arms-Only Front Crawl Swimming Is Strongly Associated With the Power-To-Drag Ratio.

Authors:  Sander Schreven; Jeroen B J Smeets; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-01

10.  A Fabricated Force Glove That Measures Hand Forces during Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Edward F Austin; Charlotte P Kearney; Pedro J Chacon; Sara A Winges; Prasanna Acharya; Jin-Woo Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.