Christian Wegmann1, Roman Pfister1, Steffen Scholz1, Anne Markhof1, Sebastian Wanke1, Kathrin Kuhr2, Tanja Rudolph1, Stephan Baldus1, Hannes Reuter3. 1. Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. 2. Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. hannes.reuter@uk-koeln.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In contemporary practice with early catheterization in most patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, the clinical utility of new or presumably new left bundle branch block (LBBB) as a diagnostic criterion equivalent to ST-segment elevation is not well established. This study therefore aimed to determine the predictive value of LBBB for the diagnosis of acute transmural myocardial infarction (or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2006 and December 2011, 1,139 consecutive patients presenting to the heart center of the University of Cologne with suspected STEMI were examined. Of these patients, 935 presented with ST elevation, 72 with LBBB, and 132 had neither of these ECG changes. The diagnosis was confirmed with immediate coronary angiography. RESULTS: Compared with ST-segment elevation, LBBB was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and end-organ damage, and more patients with LBBB presented with pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock (Killip III/IV). STEMI was confirmed in 58.3 % of patients with LBBB and in 86.4 % with ST-segment elevation. The sensitivity (0.38 [0.29-0.46]; odds ratio: 1.24) and specificity (0.67 [0.58-0.77]) of LBBB for the prediction of STEMI were low. However, the additional assessment of troponin T (> 0.1 µg/l) increased the predictive value of LBBB significantly. After adjusting for age and gender, no difference in mortality was found between the groups. CONCLUSION: LBBB with acute chest pain characterizes a cohort of patients with high morbidity and mortality. For the triage of these patients at first contact, additional criteria should be evaluated, which could increase the specificity of LBBB for the diagnosis of STEMI.
BACKGROUND: In contemporary practice with early catheterization in most patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, the clinical utility of new or presumably new left bundle branch block (LBBB) as a diagnostic criterion equivalent to ST-segment elevation is not well established. This study therefore aimed to determine the predictive value of LBBB for the diagnosis of acute transmural myocardial infarction (or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2006 and December 2011, 1,139 consecutive patients presenting to the heart center of the University of Cologne with suspected STEMI were examined. Of these patients, 935 presented with ST elevation, 72 with LBBB, and 132 had neither of these ECG changes. The diagnosis was confirmed with immediate coronary angiography. RESULTS: Compared with ST-segment elevation, LBBB was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and end-organ damage, and more patients with LBBB presented with pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock (Killip III/IV). STEMI was confirmed in 58.3 % of patients with LBBB and in 86.4 % with ST-segment elevation. The sensitivity (0.38 [0.29-0.46]; odds ratio: 1.24) and specificity (0.67 [0.58-0.77]) of LBBB for the prediction of STEMI were low. However, the additional assessment of troponin T (> 0.1 µg/l) increased the predictive value of LBBB significantly. After adjusting for age and gender, no difference in mortality was found between the groups. CONCLUSION: LBBB with acute chest pain characterizes a cohort of patients with high morbidity and mortality. For the triage of these patients at first contact, additional criteria should be evaluated, which could increase the specificity of LBBB for the diagnosis of STEMI.
Authors: Ph Gabriel Steg; Stefan K James; Dan Atar; Luigi P Badano; Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist; Michael A Borger; Carlo Di Mario; Kenneth Dickstein; Gregory Ducrocq; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Anthony H Gershlick; Pantaleo Giannuzzi; Sigrun Halvorsen; Kurt Huber; Peter Juni; Adnan Kastrati; Juhani Knuuti; Mattie J Lenzen; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Marco Valgimigli; Arnoud van 't Hof; Petr Widimsky; Doron Zahger Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Carsten Stengaard; Jacob Thorsted Sørensen; Søren Andreas Ladefoged; Erika Frischknecht Christensen; Jens Flensted Lassen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Kristian Thygesen Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Sonia Jain; Henry T Ting; Malcolm Bell; Christine M Bjerke; Ryan J Lennon; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: David M Larson; Katie M Menssen; Scott W Sharkey; Sue Duval; Robert S Schwartz; James Harris; Jeffrey T Meland; Barbara T Unger; Timothy D Henry Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-12-19 Impact factor: 56.272