Literature DB >> 26158834

The Peer-Review and Editorial System: Ways to Fix Something That Might Be Broken.

Seth J Schwartz1, Byron L Zamboanga2.   

Abstract

The present article focuses on ways to make the peer-review and editorial process more efficient and more equitable for authors. In particular, we focus on the role of editors and action editors in the process of selecting and managing reviewers, balancing their own impressions of the manuscript with the reviewers' feedback, and rendering a fair and equitable editorial decision. We advance several recommendations to conserve reviewer time, provide authors with appropriate recourse when their papers are rejected unfairly, and expedite the processing of manuscripts that do not meet the standards of the journal to which they have been submitted.
© 2009 Association for Psychological Science.

Year:  2009        PMID: 26158834     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01106.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying professionalism in peer review.

Authors:  Travis G Gerwing; Alyssa M Allen Gerwing; Stephanie Avery-Gomm; Chi-Yeung Choi; Jeff C Clements; Joshua A Rash
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2020-07-24

2.  Review time in peer review: quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows.

Authors:  Maciej J Mrowinski; Agata Fronczak; Piotr Fronczak; Olgica Nedic; Marcel Ausloos
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.238

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.