| Literature DB >> 26157534 |
Emily A Lalone1, Ruby Grewal2, Graham W King2, Joy C MacDermid3.
Abstract
Some mal-alignment of the wrist occurs in up to 71% of patients following a distal radius fracture. A multiple case study was used to provide proof of principle of an image-based technique to investigate the evolution and impact of post-traumatic joint changes at the distal radioulnar joint. Participants who had a unilateral distal radius fracture who previously participated in a prospective study were recruited from a single tertiary hand center. Long term follow-up measures of pain, disability, range of motion and radiographic alignment were obtained and compared to joint congruency measures. The inter-bone distance, a measure of joint congruency was quantified from reconstructed CT bone models of the distal radius and ulna and the clinical outcome was quantified using the patient rated wrist evaluation. In all four cases, acceptable post-reduction alignment and minimal pain/disability at 1-year suggested good clinical outcomes. However, 10 years following injury, 3 out of 4 patients had radiographic signs of degenerative changes occurring in their injured wrist (distal radioulnar joint/radio-carpal joint). Proximity maps displaying inter-bone distances showed asymmetrical congruency between wrists in these three patients. The 10-year PRWE (patient rated wrist evaluation) varied from 4 to 60, with 3 reporting minimal pain/disability and one experiencing high pain/disability. These illustrative cases demonstrate long-term joint damage post-fracture is common and occurs despite positive short-term clinical outcomes. Imaging and functional outcomes are not necessarily correlated. A novel congruency measure provides an indicator of the overall impact of joint mal-alignment that can be used to determine predictors of post-traumatic arthritis and is viable for clinical or large cohort studies.Entities:
Keywords: Degenerative disease; distal radius fracture; in vivo; joint alignment; outcome measure; x-ray computed tomography
Year: 2015 PMID: 26157534 PMCID: PMC4484343 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001509010168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Orthop J ISSN: 1874-3250
Fig. (3C)Case 3: Bilateral radiographs and joint congruency proximity maps are shown approximately 9 years post fracture. A 48 year old woman fell on her right wrist and suffered from a partial articular fracture which was treated using percutaneous pins. Radiographically this patient had high radial inclination at baseline and healed in this alignment which is also seen in the long term follow-up radiograph as is approximately 10° more inclined than the non-injured wrist (but still in the acceptable range according to ASSH standards). Joint congruency maps appear to be asymmetric in the amount of inferred high contact area between the injured and non-injured wrist. This region of high contact area is larger in the non-injured wrist. Additionally, there is a large amount of surface irregularity in the injured wrist near the periphery of the joint surface.
Fig. (3D)Case 4: Bilateral radiographs and joint congruency proximity maps are shown approximately 6 years post fracture. A 65 year old woman fell on her left wrist and suffered from a full articular fracture which was treated with external fixation and percutaneous pins. Long term radiographs show a loss of volar tilt into dorsal angulation in the injured wrist. Her non-injured wrist also appears to be in the neutral alignment in the sagittal plane but still within the acceptable alignment ASSH guidelines. Joint congruency maps appear to be asymmetric in the amount and location of the regions of inferred high contact area between the injured and uninjured wrist. This region of high contact area is larger and more distal-central in the non-injured distal radioulnar joint.
Demographic and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scores at Baseline, One Year following injury and at Long Term Follow-up. PRWE scores are shown for four illustrative cases and compared against cohort values published previously to rank patients pain and disability (+/- 20%).
| Baseline | 1 year | Long Term Follow-up | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRWE | PRWE | PRWE | ||||||||||||
| Case | Gender | Age at Injury | Age at LTFU | Dominant | Injured Wrist | Treatment | AO | Average Cohort Score (75) | Pain | Average | Pain | |||
| 1 | F | 40 | 52 | R | L | External Fixation plus Pins | A | 62 | -20% | low | 1 | -187% | low | 8 |
| 2 | F | 60 | 71 | R | L | Open Reduction | C | 88 | +16% | average | 15 | 0% | average | 12 |
| 3 | F | 48 | 57 | R | R | Pins | B | 69 | -9% | average | 15 | 0% | average | 4 |
| 4 | F | 65 | 71 | R | L | External Fixation plus Pins | C2 | 85 | +12% | average | 0 | -200% | low | 60 |
Unacceptable Parameters: (ASSH guidelines).
RI: Radial Inclination<15°.
DA: Dorsal Angulation >10° Dorsal Tilt(-), >20° Volar Tilt (+).
UV: Ulnar Variance ≥3mm.
Radiographic Measures taken at Short-term Follow-up (mean: 20 months) and Long Term follow-up (mean: 113 months). Radial Inclination (RI), Dorsal Angulation (volar +, dorsal -) (DI), Ulnar Variance (mm)-measured at the height of the distal radio-ulnar articulation (UV).
| Short Term Follow-up | Long-Term Follow-Up | Long-Term Follow-Up | KL OA Scale | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | DA | UV | RI | DA | UV | RI | DA | UV | Injured | Uninjured | |||
| Case | Radiocarpal | DRUJ | Radiocarpal | DRUJ | |||||||||
| 1 | offline | offline | offline | 20.7 | 3.1 | 1.05 | 20.4 | 9.92 | 1.57 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 |
| 2 | 17.3 | 17.2 | 2.48 | 20.1 | 14.5 | 2.32 | 29.5 | 13.6 | 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 1 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 |
| 3 | 36.7 | 8.2 | 0 | 38.9 | 8.6 | 0.92 | 29.3 | 12.5 | 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 1 | Grade 0 |
| 4 | 21.2 | -2 | 1.88 | 22.3 | -2.6 | 1.06 | 22.8 | -0.2 | 0.61 | Grade 1 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | Grade 0 |
Predictive values of short-term follow-up X-rays in predicting clinical outcomes and degenerative changes and joint congruency measures. At short-term follow-up, radiographs in all four cases indicate that fracture reduction has healed in good alignment and patients are experiencing low or average pain and disability. However, in three out of four cases, these patients developed degenerative changes seen in their injured wrist. At long term follow-up all patients had good range of motion, but one patient was experiencing high pain and disability. Proximity maps indicate deviations in the overall joint congruency between the injured and non-injured wrist of patients (symmetry of inferred contact) who have degenerative changes seen approximately 10 years later post fracture injury. This suggests that patients may need to be instructed that even mild mal-alignment can result in post-traumatic arthritis, but that it is possible that they will be symptom free in the longer term.