| Literature DB >> 26157333 |
J Arroyo-Acevedo1, R J Chávez-Asmat2, A Anampa-Guzmán3, R Donaires4, José Ráez-Gonzáles5.
Abstract
The possible protective effect of Piper aduncum capsule on DMBA (dimethylbenz[α]anthracene)-induced breast cancer in rats was assessed by monitoring the tumor and lung metastases incidence and recording hematological and biochemical parameters and frequency of micronuclei. Mammary carcinogenesis was induced in 36 female Holtzman rats by providing a single subcutaneous injection of DMBA. Oral administration of P. aduncum capsule lowered adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases incidence. Pulmonary metastasis was significantly lowered (P < 0.05). Hematological indicators showed that the triglyceride level was significantly lowered (P < 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level was significantly increased (P < 0.01). Also, P. aduncum capsule significantly lowered the C reactive protein (CRP) level (P < 0.01) and malondialdehyde level (P < 0.05). There was a significant decrease in the frequency of DMBA-induced micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte (P < 0.01). Considering the antitumorigenic, hypolipidemic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antigenotoxic properties of P. aduncum capsule, we conclude that it has a protective effect on DMBA-induced breast cancer in rats.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory; antigenotoxic; antioxidant; antitumorigenic; hypolipidemic; matico
Year: 2015 PMID: 26157333 PMCID: PMC4489669 DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S24420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) ISSN: 1178-2234
Phytochemical constituents of ethanolic extract of leaves of P. aduncum.
| CONSTITUENTS | TEST | INFERENCE |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Dragendorff | ++ |
| Mayer | ++ | |
| Anthraquinones | Borntrager | + |
| Fat and oil | Paper | + |
| Flavonoids | Shinoda | +++ |
| Phenols | Ferric chloride | ++ |
| Protein | Ninhydrin | − |
| Saponins | Frothing | ++ |
| Steroids and terpenes | Liebermann–Buchard | + |
| Tannins | Gelatin | ++ |
Notes: +++: large amount; ++: medium amount; +: small amount present; −: absent.
Major compounds of ethanolic extract of leaves of P. aduncum.
| COMPOUND | CONCENTRATION (%) |
|---|---|
| 17.16 | |
| Germacrene D | 17.16 |
| γ-Elemene | 14.48 |
| Nerolidol | 13.41 |
| α-Carophyllene | 7.65 |
| Caryophyllene | 6.8 |
| δ-Cadinene | 5.95 |
| Β-Elemene | 3.1 |
| Linalool | 2.44 |
| Linalool oxide | 0.54 |
| 88.69 |
Effect of P. aduncum capsule on histological parameters.
| TREATMENT GROUP | BODY WEIGHT (gr) | ADENOCARCINOMA | LYMPH NODE METASTASES | PULMONARY METASTASES | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFFECTED RATS/TOTAL | INCIDENCE (%) | AFFECTED RATS/TOTAL | INCIDENCE (%) | AFFECTED RATS/TOTAL | INCIDENCE (%) | ||
| Negative control | 227.83 ± 11.37 | 0/6 | 0 | 0/6 | 0 | 0/6 | 0 |
| DMBA | 235.00 ± 27.79 | 6/6 | 100.0 | 6/6 | 100.0 | 6/6 | 100.0 |
| PA 200 | 219.60 ± 10.43 | 0/6 | 0 | 0/6 | 0 | 0/6 | 0 |
| DMBA + PA50 | 212.16 ± 6.43 | 5/6 | 83.3 | 5/6 | 83.3 | 4/6 | 66.6 |
| DMBA + PA150 | 216.33 ± 12.56 | 6/6 | 100.0 | 4/6 | 66.6 | 3/6 | 50.0 |
| DMBA + PA300 | 235.33 ± 15.85 | 6/6 | 100.0 | 5/6 | 83.3 | 5/6 | 83.3 |
Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6);
(P < 0.05) versus group DMBA.
Figure 1H&E staining of mammary glands of control and experimental animals. (A) Negative control: Normal gland mammary ×100. (B) PA200: (a) Vascular congestion ×100. (C) DMBA: Adenocarcinoma (a) big breast nodules, mediastinal infiltration, (b) congestion, (c) fibrosis, (d) desmoplasia ×400. (D) DMBA + PA50: (a) Carcinoma and breast nodules with significant desmoplasia, (b) fibrosis, (c) fibrous septa (H&E) ×40. (E) DMBA + PA150: Carcinoma: (a) septum, (b) nucleus in different shapes and sizes (H&E) ×400. (F) DMBA + PA300: nodular formations ducts and vessels with great desmoplasia, moderately differentiated milk ducts. Carcinoma. (H&E) ×100.
Effect of P. aduncum capsule on hematological parameters.
| PARAMETER TREATMENT | Hb | Hct | LEUKOCYTES | HDL CHOLESTEROL (mg/dL) | TOTAL CHOLESTEROL (mg/dL) | TRIGLYCERIDES (mg/dL) | GLUCOSE (mg/dL) | UREA (mg/dL) | ALT (mg/dL) | ALP (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 10.6 ± 4.7 | 37.0 ± 6.4 | 8,133 ± 1,227 | 43.8 ± 4.0 | 179.3 ± 31.5 | 160.3 ± 31.5 | 90.0 ± 8.8 | 17.5 ± 5.4 | 23.0 ± 7.9 | 142.5 ± 21.8 |
| DMBA | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 29.2 ± 2.5 | 7,706 ± 1,280 | 35.4 ± 10.0 | 172.4 ± 28.7 | 192.8 ± 50.9 | 95.80 ± 12.0 | 24.2 ± 4.0 | 24.0 ± 6.8 | 134.2 ± 24.2 |
| PA200 | 11.9 ± 1.8 | 37.2 ± 7.6 | 7,580 ± 1,198 | 57.6 ± 8.5 | 139.4 ± 25.7 | 103.0 ± 17.6 | 86.4 ± 7.0 | 20.0 ± 5.9 | 10.2 ± 3.1 | 106.2 ± 6.6 |
| DMBA + PA50 | 10.6 ± 1.5 | 32.1 ± 4.6 | 6,450 ± 2,256 | 49.1 ± 9.7 | 148.0 ± 35.6 | 122.5 ± 12.0 | 83.5 ± 11.2 | 17.5 ± 5.4 | 9.1 ± 3.1 | 119.5 ± 41.8 |
| DMBA + PA150 | 10.9 ± 1.8 | 33.6 ± 4.9 | 8,533 ± 1,628 | 48.3 ± 11.0 | 196.1 ± 49.4 | 145.0 ± 32.4 | 89.8 ± 15.0 | 20.8 ± 4.8 | 21.1 ± 9.0 | 141.5 ± 18.2 |
| DMBA + PA300 | 10.8 ± 1.8 | 34.6 ± 5.8 | 6,116 ± 2,172 | 43.1 ± 4.1 | 163.3 ± 31.2 | 160.6 ± 31.8 | 91.1 ± 11.1 | 17.5 ± 5.4 | 27.5 ± 13.9 | 132.8 ± 36.0 |
| Coefficient | 1.25/0.28 | 1.56/0.21 | 1.77/0.16 | 4.18/0.01 | 2.17/0.10 | 6.28/0.01 | 0.86/0.49 | 1.53/0.22 | 5.36/0.01 | 1.24/0.32 |
Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n=6).
ANOVA test. Tukey test
(P < 0,05) versus group DMBA.
(P < 0.01) versus group DMBA.
(P < 0.05) versus group DMBA + PA300.
Effect of P. auduncum capsule on biochemical parameters.
| PARAMETER TREATMENT | SOD (U/mL) | MDA (10−6 mol/L) | NO (µmol/L) | CRP (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 6.7 ± 4.5 | 2.3 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| DMBA | 3.6 ± 2.2 | 10.4 ± 7.8 | 135.7 ± 53.5 | 2.6 ± 1.6 |
| PA200 | 12.8 ± 4.3 | 3.3 ± 1.9 | 71.9 ± 19.7 | 1.1 ± 0.5 |
| DMBA + PA50 | 10.5 ± 4.9 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 80.4 ± 46.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| DMBA + PA150 | 12.6 ± 9.5 | 7.8 ± 3.1 | 134.0 ± 47.8 | 1.3 ± 0.9 |
| DMBA + PA300 | 9.8 ± 6.3 | 4.9 ± 2.1 | 130.0 ± 45.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| Coefficient | 1.90/0.14 | 3.57/0.02 | 2.74/0.04 | 4.41/0.01 |
Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).
ANOVA test. Tukey test
(P < 0.05) versus group DMBA;
(P < 0.01) versus group DMBA.
Figure 2Effect of Piper aduncum capsule on the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN PCE). Each value represents mean ± SD (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *(P < 0.01) versus group DMBA. **(P < 0.05) versus group DMBA.