Tomonobu Ishigaki1, Tomoya Ishida2, Mina Samukawa3, Hiroshi Saito3, Yuya Ezawa4, Motoki Hirokawa5, Takumi Kato6, Makoto Sugawara4, Harukazu Tohyama3, Masanori Yamanaka3. 1. Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Japan ; Matsuda Orthopaedic Memorial Hospital, Japan. 2. Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Japan ; Hokushin Hospital, Japan. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Japan. 4. Matsuda Orthopaedic Memorial Hospital, Japan. 5. Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Japan. 6. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Abstract
[Purpose] Glenohumeral posterior capsule tightness possibly relates to posterior capsule thickness (PCT). The purpose of the current study was to analyze the relationships between PCT and glenohumeral range of motion (ROM) in horizontal adduction (HAdd) and internal rotation (IR). [Subjects and Methods] This study recruited 39 healthy collegiate baseball players. We measured PCT by using ultrasonography and ROM of the glenohumeral joint of the throwing shoulder by using a digital inclinometer. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between PCT and HAdd or IR ROM. [Results] There was no correlation between PCT and HAdd ROM, but PCT was significantly correlated with IR ROM. [Conclusion] This result indicates that posterior shoulder capsule tightness only relates to IR ROM, and that restricted HAdd ROM might reflect tightness of other tissue, such as the posterior deltoid.
[Purpose] Glenohumeral posterior capsule tightness possibly relates to posterior capsule thickness (PCT). The purpose of the current study was to analyze the relationships between PCT and glenohumeral range of motion (ROM) in horizontal adduction (HAdd) and internal rotation (IR). [Subjects and Methods] This study recruited 39 healthy collegiate baseball players. We measured PCT by using ultrasonography and ROM of the glenohumeral joint of the throwing shoulder by using a digital inclinometer. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between PCT and HAdd or IR ROM. [Results] There was no correlation between PCT and HAdd ROM, but PCT was significantly correlated with IR ROM. [Conclusion] This result indicates that posterior shoulder capsule tightness only relates to IR ROM, and that restricted HAdd ROM might reflect tightness of other tissue, such as the posterior deltoid.
It is common for throwing athletes to demonstrate limited glenohumeral internal rotation
(IR) (Fig. 1A) of their throwing shoulder compared with their non-throwing shoulder. This loss of
IR range of motion (ROM) is termed GIRD which is an acronym for glenohumeral IR deficit1). There have been several studies to indicate
a relationship between GIRD and throwing-related injury, including shoulder and/or elbow
problems2,3,4,5,6). Furthermore, a previous
prospective study demonstrated that professional baseball pitchers with GIRD may have a
higher risk of shoulder injury5).
Fig. 1.
Measurement of the ROMs. (A) Glenohumeral internal rotation. (B) Glenohumeral
horizontal adduction.
Measurement of the ROMs. (A) Glenohumeral internal rotation. (B) Glenohumeral
horizontal adduction.Burkhurt et al. described the possibility that contracture of the posterior capsule can be
led by response to distractive loads during the follow-through phase of throwing motion1). Furthermore, previous cadaveric studies
demonstrated that simulated posterior capsule contracture caused GIRD7, 8). Burkhurt et al.
also reported that baseball players with GIRD have a thickened posterior capsule at the
posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral joint-ligament complex1). Thomas et al. measured posterior capsule thickness (PCT) in
their study, and confirmed the reliability and validity of PCT measurement using
ultrasonography9, 10). In addition, they also revealed that the dominant shoulder has a
thicker posterior capsule than the non-dominant shoulder, and that there is a significant
correlation between PCT and IR ROM. Based on their study, PCT measurement can be a way to
assess posterior capsule tightness in vivo.Glenohumeral horizontal adduction (HAdd) ROM (Fig.
1B) also can be used to assess posterior capsule tightness as well as measuring IR
ROM. Several previous studies have investigated the reliability and validity of HAdd ROM
measurement to assess posterior shoulder tightness11,12,13). These studies indicated good to high reliability, and revealed the
validity of HAdd by comparing it with IR. However, there has been no study to analyze the
relationship between PCT and HAdd ROM. We hypothesized that PCT would correlate with HAdd as
well as IR ROM. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the correlations between PCT
and IR or HAdd ROM in order to determine which ROMs reflects posterior capsule
tightness.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Thirty-nine collegiate baseball players, including 11 pitchers and 28 position players
(age, 20.0 ± 1.36 years; height, 174.59 ± 5.47 cm; weight, 71.89 ± 7.61 kg; duration of
playing baseball, 10.89 ± 2.30 years), volunteered to participate in this study. All
participants were members of a baseball team that belongs to a division one collegiate
league in a local region of Japan. Participants who were not able to throw at the time of
measurement, and who had orthopedic and/or neurologic problems, were excluded from this
study. All participants read and signed an informed consent form prior to their inclusion in
this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of
Health Sciences of Hokkaido University (12-9).As measurement posture, the participant was seated upright in a chair, with one arm beside
his body and the shoulder internally rotated. Our pilot study of 25 anterior-posterior
shoulder radiographs showed that the middle region of the posterior capsule is located at
the upper 21% between the superior and inferior angles of the scapula. Therefore, we
measured the length between the scapular superior and inferior angles, and calculated 21% of
the length from the superior angle as the middle region of posterior capsule height. Then,
we measured PCT by using a MyLab 25 ultrasound unit (Biosound Esaote, Indianapolis, IN, USA)
using a modified method of a previously reported technique9, 10). Our original device was
placed on the posterior aspect of the scapula along the scapular medial border, and the
ultrasound transducer, which was applied standard acoustic coupling gel, was placed between
the two bars of the device to visualize the posterior capsule (Fig. 2A). The posterior capsule was identified as the tissue found immediately lateral to the
glenoid labrum, between the humeral head and rotator cuff (Fig. 2B)9, 10). When the capsule was identified, the
image was paused and stored to the hard drive of the ultrasound machine, and PCT was
measured. We carried out another pilot study that analyzed the side-to-side difference in
PCT in collegiate baseball players (n = 9; age, 23.9 ± 4.5 years; height, 173.2 ± 5.5 cm;
weight, 67.2 ± 7.9 kg), which revealed a significantly thickened posterior capsule of the
throwing shoulder compared with the non-throwing shoulder. This result is consistent with a
previous study9). Taking our pilot study
and the previous study into account, thickening of the posterior capsule could be a specific
alteration of the throwing shoulder in baseball players. Therefore, in this study, we
measured PCT of the throwing shoulder only. This measurement procedure was conducted twice
in every shoulder, and the average of the measurements was used for statistical analysis. We
also analyzed the reliability of this method using 16 healthy collegiate baseball players
(age, 19.4 ± 1.0 years; height, 169.0 ± 6.6 cm; weight, 62.3 ± 5.2 kg) in order to evaluate
intra- and inter-rater reliability. In the reliability study, all subjects had once
undergone the procedure described above by two examiners (T. I. and T. K.). Seven days after
the first observation, they visited our laboratory again, and underwent the same procedure
by one examiner (T. K.).
Fig. 2.
Measurement of posterior capsule thickness. (A) Photograph, demonstrating how to use
our original device to detect height of posterior capsule. (B) Ultrasonographic image,
showing PCT (double arrowheads), glenoid (G), humeral head (HH), and labrum (shadow
and L).
Measurement of posterior capsule thickness. (A) Photograph, demonstrating how to use
our original device to detect height of posterior capsule. (B) Ultrasonographic image,
showing PCT (double arrowheads), glenoid (G), humeral head (HH), and labrum (shadow
and L).For assessment of HAdd and IR ROM, participants were asked to lie down on a table and
relax. All measurements were conducted by two experienced physical therapists (T. I. and T.
K.) using a digital inclinometer (Survey Techno-Science, Nagoya, Japan). For HAdd ROM
measurement, one investigator put his hand on the lateral border of the subject’s scapula to
restrict any scapular motion, and moved the subject’s arm to a horizontally adducted
position until the investigator perceived movement of the subject’s scapula. Another
investigator placed the inclinometer on the subject’s arm to measure the HAdd angle. For IR
ROM measurement, the subject’s shoulder was placed at 90° abduction with the elbow flexed to
90° and the forearm in a middle position between pronation and supination. One investigator
put his palm on the subject’s coracoid, while the other hand internally rotated the
subject’s arm. Another investigator placed the inclinometer on the subject’s forearm to
measure the IR angle.Descriptive data included means ± SDs. In order to reveal test-retest reliability of our
PCT measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for both intra-
and inter-rater reliability. ICC (1, 2) and ICC (2, 2) were calculated
to demonstrate intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Pearson’s correlation
coefficients were calculated to reveal the relationships between PCT and each ROM
measurement. PASW Statistics version 18 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for
statistical analyses, and coefficients were considered significant at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Mean PCT, HAdd and IR were 1.24 mm ± 0.29 mm, 96.04° ± 9.97°, and 43.05° ± 9.93°,
respectively.Reliability analysis of 16 baseball players demonstrated an almost perfect intra-rater
reliability (ICC (1, 2) = 0.95, p < 0.01) and an almost perfect inter-rater
reliability (ICC (2, 2) = 0.98, p < 0.001).There was a significant relationship between PCT and IR ROM (r = −0.351, p = 0.028), but
there was no significant relationship between PCT and HAdd ROM (r = 0.156, p = 0.343).
DISCUSSION
The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that PCT correlates with not only IR
ROM but also HAdd ROM. We found there was no significant relationship between PCT measured
by using ultrasonography and HAdd ROM, but we did find a significant correlation between PCT
and IR ROM. Therefore, results of the present study clearly denied our hypothesis. Findings
of the present study suggest that IR ROM deficit relates to posterior capsule tightness,
even though previous studies have reported a significant correlation between IR and
HAdd11,12,13).We do not know the exact reason why we failed to show a significant relationship between
PCT and HAdd ROM in the present study. However, there is a study that compared the effects
of stretching on posterior shoulder tightness, such as restriction of IR and HAdd ROM,
between sleeper stretch, including IR motion, and cross-body stretch, including HAdd motion.
This previous study reported that cross-body stretch was more effective to reduce posterior
shoulder tightness compared with sleeper stretch14). In addition, other previous studies have demonstrated that the
posterior deltoid muscle was stretched with HAdd, whereas both the posterior shoulder
capsule and the middle and inferior regions of the infraspinatus were not stretched with
HAdd15, 16). Therefore, considering the results of this study and these
previous studies, IR ROM deficit may reflect stiffness of both the posterior capsule and
other soft tissue, whereas HAdd ROM restriction may reflect stiffness of only soft tissue,
such as the posterior deltoid muscle, rather than the posterior capsule.There are a few limitations in this study. First, the value of PCT in this study was
relatively smaller than that in a previous study9,
10). Body mass of participants in the
previous study was larger than that of participants in this study (previous study, 88.14 kg
± 4.81 kg; present study, 71.86 ± 7.5 kg). It has been reported that body mass can affect
ball velocity in baseball pitching17). The
difference in ball velocity might affect the distraction load, which causes posterior
shoulder tightness, and, thus, PCT in this study was relatively smaller than that in the
previous study. Second, the correlation coefficient obtained in the present study represents
a weak correlation between PCT and IR ROM, though it is similar to that in a previous
study9). Hence, there is some possibility
that other tissue, such as the rotator cuff tendon or posterior deltoid muscle, restricts IR
ROM. Third, humeral retroversion was not considered in this study, even though it is known
to decrease IR ROM. Thomas et al. also reported that humeral retroversion is related to
PCT10). Therefore, further study should
consider humeral retroversion when measuring glenohumeral ROM.Concerning clinical relevance, previous cadaveric studies have demonstrated that posterior
capsule tightness augments subacromial pressure during arm elevation8, 18). Furthermore,
Maenhout et al. suggested that healthy overhead-throwing athletes with GIRD demonstrate a
smaller acromiohumeral distance19), which
represents two-dimensional assessment of the subacromial space. Thus, posterior capsule
tightness might affect shoulder problems by reducing the subacromial space and by scapular
dyskinesis. Although baseball players demonstrate greater IR ROM deficit, induced by
posterior shoulder tightness, of the throwing shoulder, identifying which tissue restricts
posterior shoulder flexibility is reasonable to prevent throwing-related problems, because
strategies to improve posterior shoulder tightness would differ depending on the tissue that
induces the tightness. Therefore, we believe the results of this study can be helpful to
identify the cause of posterior shoulder tightness.
Authors: Michael J Fitzpatrick; James E Tibone; Mark Grossman; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Craig A Wassinger; Robert D Ricci; John P Abt; Kevin M Conley; Scott M Lephart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Stephen J Thomas; Charles Buz Swanik; Thomas W Kaminski; Jill S Higginson; Kathleen A Swanik; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Levon N Nazarian Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Timothy F Tyler; Stephen J Nicholas; Steven J Lee; Michael Mullaney; Malachy P McHugh Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Annelies Maenhout; Valerie Van Eessel; Lieselot Van Dyck; Aagje Vanraes; Ann Cools Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 6.202