Literature DB >> 26156873

Blood Pressure Lowering Medication, Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability, and Cognitive Function in Old Age.

Liselotte W Wijsman1, Anton J M de Craen1, Majon Muller1, Behnam Sabayan2, David Stott3, Ian Ford4, Stella Trompet5, J Wouter Jukema6, Rudi G J Westendorp7, Simon P Mooijaart8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability is associated with cognitive impairment. We assessed to what extent the association between BP variability and cognitive impairment is mediated by the association of BP lowering medication (BPLM) with both BP variability and cognition.
METHODS: We studied 5,606 participants from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER). BP was measured every 3 months during 3.2 years; BP variability was defined as the SD of BP measurements during follow-up. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and during follow-up using the Stroop test, Letter-Digit Coding test, and immediate and delayed Picture-Word Learning tests. Multivariate regression models were used with and without adjustments for BPLM to calculate the percentage to which BPLM mediated the association between BP variability and cognition.
RESULTS: Participants taking calcium antagonists had a higher score in baseline Letter-Digit Coding test (mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 (0.06; 0.88). Participants taking beta-blockers had a steeper decline in Stroop test (additional change per year (95% CI) 0.40 (0.09; 0.70) and Letter-Digit Coding test (0.08 (-0.15; -0.02)). Furthermore, a steeper decline in Stroop test was found in participants taking renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (0.50 (0.16; 0.85). Systolic BP variability was higher in participants taking beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors (mean difference in systolic BP variability in mm Hg (95% CI) 0.75 (0.45; 1.04) and 1.37 (1.04; 1.71) respectively). Participants taking diuretics, calcium antagonists, and RAS inhibitors had a higher diastolic BP variability (mean difference in diastolic BP variability in mm Hg (95% CI) 0.27 (0.04; 0.49), 0.37 (0.12; 0.62) and 0.65 (0.37; 0.93) SD, respectively). Beta estimates remained essentially the same when we adjusted for BPLM in the association of BP variability with cognitive function.
CONCLUSIONS: The association between BP variability and cognitive impairment was not mediated by BPLM. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2015. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cognition; hypertension; medication; variability.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156873     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpv101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  11 in total

1.  Preoperative outpatient blood pressure variability predicts postoperative mortality, readmission and morbidity after surgery.

Authors:  Marc D Basson; Marilyn G Klug; William E Newman; Cornelius Dyke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Blood Pressure Variability and Cognitive Function: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nur Fazidah Asmuje; Sumaiyah Mat; Phyo Kyaw Myint; Maw Pin Tan
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Use of blood pressure measurements extracted from the electronic health record in predicting Alzheimer's disease: A retrospective cohort study at two medical centers.

Authors:  Donna Tjandra; Raymond Q Migrino; Bruno Giordani; Jenna Wiens
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 16.655

4.  Association Between Blood Pressure Variability With Dementia and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rianne A A de Heus; Christophe Tzourio; Emily Jo Lynn Lee; Melissa Opozda; Andrew D Vincent; Kaarin J Anstey; Albert Hofman; Kazuomi Kario; Simona Lattanzi; Lenore J Launer; Yuan Ma; Rajiv Mahajan; Simon P Mooijaart; Michiaki Nagai; Ruth Peters; Deborah Turnbull; Yuichiro Yano; Jurgen A H R Claassen; Phillip J Tully
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 9.897

Review 5.  Hypertension, Blood Pressure Variability, and Target Organ Lesion.

Authors:  Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen; Kátia De Angelis; Fernando Dos Santos; Daniela R Dartora; Bruno Rodrigues; Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Association of Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure with Cardiovascular Disease among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhe Bin Yu; Die Li; Xue Yu Chen; Pei Wen Zheng; Hong Bo Lin; Meng Ling Tang; Ming Juan Jin; Jian Bing Wang; Kun Chen
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.376

7.  Beta-Blockers for the Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Lanham; Sana Ali; Daniel Davis; Mark James Rawle
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Age-Specific Associations of Usual Blood Pressure Variability With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: 10-Year Diabetes Mellitus Cohort Study.

Authors:  Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Esther Yee Tak Yu; Weng Yee Chin; Jessica K Barrett; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Esther Wai Yin Chan; Celine Sze Ling Chui; Shiqi Chen; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Relationship between saline infusion and blood pressure variability in non-critically patients with hypertension: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Junjie Nie; Yue Wang; Yingpei Zhang; Dongfang Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cognitive Decline and Dementia Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Joanne Ryan; Enayet K Chowdhury; Karen L Margolis; Lawrence J Beilin; Christopher M Reid; Mark R Nelson; Robyn L Woods; Raj C Shah; Suzanne G Orchard; Rory Wolfe; Elsdon Storey; Andrew M Tonkin; Amy Brodtmann; John J McNeil; Anne M Murray
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.