Literature DB >> 26156157

Engineering New Approaches to Cancer Vaccines.

Naveen K Mehta1, Kelly D Moynihan2, Darrell J Irvine3.   

Abstract

Recently, a number of promising approaches have been developed using synthetic chemistry, materials science, and bioengineering-based strategies to address challenges in the design of more effective cancer vaccines. At the stage of initial priming, potency can be improved by maximizing vaccine delivery to lymph nodes. Because lymphatic uptake from peripheral tissues is strongly size dependent, antigens and adjuvants packaged into optimally sized nanoparticles access the lymph node with much greater efficiency than unformulated vaccines. Once primed, T cells must home to the tumor site. Because T cells acquire the necessary surface receptors in the local lymph node draining the tissue of interest, vaccines must be engineered that reach organs, such as the lung and gut, which are common sites of tumor lesions but inaccessible by traditional vaccination routes. Particulate vaccine carriers can improve antigen exposure in these organs, resulting in greater lymphocyte priming. Immunomodulatory agents can also be injected directly into the tumor site to stimulate a systemic response capable of clearing even distal lesions; materials have been designed that entrap or slowly release immunomodulators at the tumor site, reducing systemic exposure and improving therapeutic efficacy. Finally, lessons learned from the design of biomaterial-based scaffolds in regenerative medicine have led to the development of implantable vaccines that recruit and activate antigen-presenting cells to drive antitumor immunity. Overall, these engineering strategies represent an expanding toolkit to create safe and effective cancer vaccines. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156157      PMCID: PMC4527881          DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res        ISSN: 2326-6066            Impact factor:   11.151


  71 in total

1.  Size-dependent immunogenicity: therapeutic and protective properties of nano-vaccines against tumors.

Authors:  Theodora Fifis; Anita Gamvrellis; Blessing Crimeen-Irwin; Geoffrey A Pietersz; Jie Li; Patricia L Mottram; Ian F C McKenzie; Magdalena Plebanski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Exploiting lymphatic transport and complement activation in nanoparticle vaccines.

Authors:  Sai T Reddy; André J van der Vlies; Eleonora Simeoni; Veronique Angeli; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Conlin P O'Neil; Leslie K Lee; Melody A Swartz; Jeffrey A Hubbell
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Nanoparticle conjugation of CpG enhances adjuvancy for cellular immunity and memory recall at low dose.

Authors:  Alexandre de Titta; Marie Ballester; Ziad Julier; Chiara Nembrini; Laura Jeanbart; André J van der Vlies; Melody A Swartz; Jeffrey A Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Trial watch: IDO inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Fernando Aranda; Alexander Eggermont; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Eric Tartour; Eugene P Kennedy; Michael Platten; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Engulfing tumors with synthetic extracellular matrices for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yuki Hori; Patrick J Stern; Richard O Hynes; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Dendritic-cell-based therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Karolina Palucka; Jacques Banchereau
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Localized oncolytic virotherapy overcomes systemic tumor resistance to immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; James P Allison; Dmitriy Zamarin; Rikke B Holmgaard; Sumit K Subudhi; Joon Seok Park; Mena Mansour; Peter Palese; Taha Merghoub
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Induction of potent anti-tumor responses while eliminating systemic side effects via liposome-anchored combinatorial immunotherapy.

Authors:  Brandon Kwong; Haipeng Liu; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Large intestine-targeted, nanoparticle-releasing oral vaccine to control genitorectal viral infection.

Authors:  Qing Zhu; James Talton; Guofeng Zhang; Tshaka Cunningham; Zijian Wang; Robert C Waters; James Kirk; Bärbel Eppler; Dennis M Klinman; Yongjun Sui; Susan Gagnon; Igor M Belyakov; Russell J Mumper; Jay A Berzofsky
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  21 in total

1.  Delivery of mRNA vaccine with a lipid-like material potentiates antitumor efficacy through Toll-like receptor 4 signaling.

Authors:  Hongxia Zhang; Xinru You; Xiaojuan Wang; Lei Cui; Zining Wang; Feifei Xu; Mengyun Li; Zhenggang Yang; Jinyun Liu; Peng Huang; Yang Kang; Jun Wu; Xiaojun Xia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A T cell equation as a conceptual model of T cell responses for maximizing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Haidong Dong; Yiyi Yan; Roxana S Dronca; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  SOJ Immunol       Date:  2017-02-25

Review 3.  Biomaterials for vaccine-based cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Margaret M Billingsley; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  α-Galactosylceramide and peptide-based nano-vaccine synergistically induced a strong tumor suppressive effect in melanoma.

Authors:  Vanessa Sainz; Liane I F Moura; Carina Peres; Ana I Matos; Ana S Viana; Angela M Wagner; Julia E Vela Ramirez; Teresa S Barata; Manuela Gaspar; Steve Brocchini; Mire Zloh; Nicholas A Peppas; Ronit Satchi-Fainaro; Helena F Florindo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials.

Authors:  David G Leach; Simon Young; Jeffrey D Hartgerink
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Co-delivery of Peptide Neoantigens and Stimulator of Interferon Genes Agonists Enhances Response to Cancer Vaccines.

Authors:  Daniel Shae; Jessalyn J Baljon; Mohamed Wehbe; Plamen P Christov; Kyle W Becker; Amrendra Kumar; Naveenchandra Suryadevara; Carcia S Carson; Christian R Palmer; Frances C Knight; Sebastian Joyce; John T Wilson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Injectable, Tough Alginate Cryogels as Cancer Vaccines.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Shih; Serena O Blacklow; Aileen W Li; Benjamin R Freedman; Sidi Bencherif; Sandeep T Koshy; Max C Darnell; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 8.  Biomaterials for enhancing anti-cancer immunity.

Authors:  Sandeep T Koshy; David J Mooney
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 9.  Enhancing vaccine effectiveness with delivery technology.

Authors:  Marie Beitelshees; Yi Li; Blaine A Pfeifer
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 9.740

10.  Peptide Vaccine Formulation Controls the Duration of Antigen Presentation and Magnitude of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Response.

Authors:  Hiep Khong; Annika Volmari; Meenu Sharma; Zhimin Dai; Chinonye S Imo; Yared Hailemichael; Manisha Singh; Derek T Moore; Zhilan Xiao; Xue-Fei Huang; Thomas D Horvath; David H Hawke; Willem W Overwijk
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.