Literature DB >> 26156127

Bottom-up effects of a no-take zone on endangered penguin demographics.

Richard B Sherley, Henning Winker, Res Altwegg, Carl D van der Lingen, Stephen C Votier, Robert J M Crawford.   

Abstract

Marine no-take zones can have positive impacts for target species and are increasingly important management tools. However, whether they indirectly benefit higher order predators remains unclear. The endangered African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) depends on commercially exploited forage fish. We examined how chick survival responded to an experimental 3-year fishery closure around Robben Island, South Africa, controlling for variation in prey biomass and fishery catches. Chick survival increased by 18% when the closure was initiated, which alone led to a predicted 27% higher population compared with continued fishing. However, the modelled population continued to decline, probably because of high adult mortality linked to poor prey availability over larger spatial scales. Our results illustrate that small no-take zones can have bottom-up benefits for highly mobile marine predators, but are only one component of holistic, ecosystem-based management regimes.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156127      PMCID: PMC4528441          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Global seabird response to forage fish depletion--one-third for the birds.

Authors:  Philippe M Cury; Ian L Boyd; Sylvain Bonhommeau; Tycho Anker-Nilssen; Robert J M Crawford; Robert W Furness; James A Mills; Eugene J Murphy; Henrik Osterblom; Michelle Paleczny; John F Piatt; Jean-Paul Roux; Lynne Shannon; William J Sydeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison.

Authors:  Martyn Plummer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Marine no-take zone rapidly benefits endangered penguin.

Authors:  L Pichegru; D Grémillet; R J M Crawford; P G Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Use of long-distance migration patterns of an endangered species to inform conservation planning for the world's largest marine protected area.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Jeanne A Mortimer; Daniel Ierodiaconou; Nicole Esteban
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Malin L Pinsky; Stephen R Palumbi; James A Estes; Francis H Joyce; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Differential effects of a local industrial sand lance fishery on seabird breeding performance.

Authors:  Morten Frederiksen; Henrik Jensen; Francis Daunt; Roderick A Mavor; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  African penguins put researchers in a flap.

Authors:  Michael Cherry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Fishing amplifies forage fish population collapses.

Authors:  Timothy E Essington; Pamela E Moriarty; Halley E Froehlich; Emma E Hodgson; Laura E Koehn; Kiva L Oken; Margaret C Siple; Christine C Stawitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 12.779

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Conservation management: Probe effects of krill fishing and climate.

Authors:  Tom Hart; Heather J Lynch; Ron Naveen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Important marine areas for endangered African penguins before and after the crucial stage of moulting.

Authors:  Tegan Carpenter-Kling; Andrew de Blocq; Christina Hagen; Craig Harding; Taryn Morris; Lorien Pichegru; Jennifer Roberts; Peter G Ryan; Ross M Wanless; Alistair McInnes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Avoidance of seismic survey activities by penguins.

Authors:  Lorien Pichegru; Reason Nyengera; Alistair M McInnes; Pierre Pistorius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Identifying Risk: Concurrent Overlap of the Antarctic Krill Fishery with Krill-Dependent Predators in the Scotia Sea.

Authors:  Jefferson T Hinke; Anthony M Cossio; Michael E Goebel; Christian S Reiss; Wayne Z Trivelpiece; George M Watters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  From incubation to release: Hand-rearing as a tool for the conservation of the endangered African penguin.

Authors:  Romy Klusener; Renata Hurtado; Nola J Parsons; Ralph Eric Thijl Vanstreels; Nicola Stander; Stephen van der Spuy; Katrin Ludynia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Applying science to pressing conservation needs for penguins.

Authors:  P D Boersma; P García Borboroglu; N J Gownaris; C A Bost; A Chiaradia; S Ellis; T Schneider; P J Seddon; A Simeone; P N Trathan; L J Waller; B Wienecke
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics.

Authors:  Richard B Sherley; Barbara J Barham; Peter J Barham; Kate J Campbell; Robert J M Crawford; Jennifer Grigg; Cat Horswill; Alistair McInnes; Taryn L Morris; Lorien Pichegru; Antje Steinfurth; Florian Weller; Henning Winker; Stephen C Votier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sex-biased survival contributes to population decline in a long-lived seabird, the Magellanic Penguin.

Authors:  N J Gownaris; P D Boersma
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.657

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.