Literature DB >> 26155813

Validity of Ski Skating Center-of-Mass Displacement Measured by a Single Inertial Measurement Unit.

Håvard Myklebust1, Øyvind Gløersen, Jostein Hallén.   

Abstract

In regard to simplifying motion analysis and estimating center of mass (COM) in ski skating, this study addressed 3 main questions concerning the use of inertial measurement units (IMU): (1) How accurately can a single IMU estimate displacement of os sacrum (S1) on a person during ski skating? (2) Does incorporating gyroscope and accelerometer data increase accuracy and precision? (3) Moreover, how accurately does S1 determine COM displacement? Six world-class skiers roller-ski skated on a treadmill using 2 different subtechniques. An IMU including accelerometers alone (IMU-A) or in combination with gyroscopes (IMU-G) were mounted on the S1. A reflective marker at S1, and COM calculated from 3D full-body optical analysis, were used to provide reference values. IMU-A provided an accurate and precise estimate of vertical S1 displacement, but IMU-G was required to attain accuracy and precision of < 8 mm (root-mean-squared error and range of displacement deviation) in all directions and with both subtechniques. Further, arm and torso movements affected COM, but not the S1. Hence, S1 displacement was valid for estimating sideways COM displacement, but the systematic amplitude and timing difference between S1 and COM displacement in the anteroposterior and vertical directions inhibits exact calculation of energy fluctuations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26155813     DOI: 10.1123/jab.2015-0081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  8 in total

Review 1.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  An Inertial Sensor-Based Method for Estimating the Athlete's Relative Joint Center Positions and Center of Mass Kinematics in Alpine Ski Racing.

Authors:  Benedikt Fasel; Jörg Spörri; Pascal Schütz; Silvio Lorenzetti; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Propulsive Power in Cross-Country Skiing: Application and Limitations of a Novel Wearable Sensor-Based Method During Roller Skiing.

Authors:  Øyvind Gløersen; Thomas Losnegard; Anders Malthe-Sørenssen; Dag Kristian Dysthe; Matthias Gilgien
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Estimation of Human Center of Mass Position through the Inertial Sensors-Based Methods in Postural Tasks: An Accuracy Evaluation.

Authors:  Marco Germanotta; Ilaria Mileti; Ilaria Conforti; Zaccaria Del Prete; Irene Aprile; Eduardo Palermo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Classification of Cross-Country Ski Skating Sub-Technique Can Be Automated Using Carrier-Phase Differential GNSS Measurements of the Head's Position.

Authors:  Øyvind Gløersen; Matthias Gilgien
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Smartphone Monitoring of Gait and Balance During Irregular Surface Walking and Obstacle Crossing.

Authors:  Janeesata Kuntapun; Patima Silsupadol; Teerawat Kamnardsiri; Vipul Lugade
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  Kinematic differences between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 skating technique.

Authors:  Håvard Myklebust; Thomas Losnegard; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Tracking Performance in Endurance Racing Sports: Evaluation of the Accuracy Offered by Three Commercial GNSS Receivers Aimed at the Sports Market.

Authors:  Øyvind Gløersen; Jan Kocbach; Matthias Gilgien
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.