Literature DB >> 26154442

Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the lung in patients with cystic fibrosis with regard to clinical, laboratory, and pulmonary functional parameters.

Diane M Renz1, Oriane Scholz, Joachim Böttcher, Martin H Maurer, Timm Denecke, Carsten Schwarz, Alexander Pfeil, Florian Streitparth, Alexander Huppertz, Anne Mehl, Alexander Poellinger, Doris Staab, Bernd Hamm, Hans-Joachim Mentzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective as computed tomography (CT) in determining morphologic and functional pulmonary changes in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in association with multiple clinical parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. In this prospective study, 30 patients with CF (17 men and 13 women; mean (SD) age, 30.2 (9.2) years; range, 19-52 years) were included. Chest CT was acquired by unenhanced low-dose technique for clinical purposes. Lung MRI (1.5 T) comprised T2- and T1-weighted sequences before and after the application of 0.1-mmol·kg gadobutrol, also considering lung perfusion imaging. All CT and MR images were visually evaluated by using 2 different scoring systems: the modified Helbich and the Eichinger scores. Signal intensity of the peribronchial walls and detected mucus on T2-weighted images as well as signal enhancement of the peribronchial walls on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were additionally assessed on MRI. For the clinical evaluation, the pulmonary exacerbation rate, laboratory, and pulmonary functional parameters were determined.
RESULTS: The overall modified Helbich CT score had a mean (SD) of 15.3 (4.8) (range, 3-21) and median of 16.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.3). The overall modified Helbich MR score showed slightly, not significantly, lower values (Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student t test; P > 0.05): mean (SD) of 14.3 (4.7) (range, 3-20) and median of 15.0 (IQR, 7.3). Without assessment of perfusion, the overall Eichinger score resulted in the following values for CT vs MR examinations: mean (SD), 20.3 (7.2) (range, 4-31); and median, 21.0 (IQR, 9.5) vs mean (SD), 19.5 (7.1) (range, 4-33); and median, 20.0 (IQR, 9.0). All differences between CT and MR examinations were not significant (Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Student t tests; P > 0.05). In general, the correlations of the CT scores (overall and different imaging parameters) to the clinical parameters were slightly higher compared to the MRI scores. However, if all additional MRI parameters were integrated into the scoring systems, the correlations reached the values of the CT scores. The overall image quality was significantly higher for the CT examinations compared to the MRI sequences.
CONCLUSIONS: One major diagnostic benefit of lung MRI in CF is the possible acquisition of several different morphologic and functional imaging features without the use of any radiation exposure. Lung MRI shows reliable associations with CT and clinical parameters, which suggests its implementation in CF for routine diagnosis, which would be particularly important in follow-up imaging over the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26154442     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of MR imaging during one-lung flooding in a large animal model.

Authors:  Frank Wolfram; Daniel Güllmar; Joachim Böttcher; Harald Schubert; Sabine Bischoff; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Thomas Günther Lesser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Lung morphology assessment of cystic fibrosis using MRI with ultra-short echo time at submillimeter spatial resolution.

Authors:  Gaël Dournes; Fanny Menut; Julie Macey; Michaël Fayon; Jean-François Chateil; Marjorie Salel; Olivier Corneloup; Michel Montaudon; Patrick Berger; François Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The current status and further prospects for lung magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  Franz Wolfgang Hirsch; Ina Sorge; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Christian Roth; Daniel Gräfe; Anne Päts; Andreas Voskrebenzev; Rebecca Marie Anders
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-01-29

4.  Organization of Patient Management and Fungal Epidemiology in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Carsten Schwarz; Jean-Philippe Bouchara; Walter Buzina; Vanda Chrenkova; Hanna Dmeńska; Elia Gomez Garcia de la Pedrosa; Rafael Cantón; Ersilia Fiscarelli; Yohann Le Govic; Nahid Kondori; Tadeja Matos; Ewa Romanowska; Stefan Ziesing; Ludwig Sedlacek
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.574

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom.

Authors:  Madeleine Bonert; Moritz Schneider; Olga Solyanik; Katharina Hellbach; David Bondesson; Thomas Gaass; Natalie Thaens; Jens Ricke; Thomas Benkert; Julien Dinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences.

Authors:  Diane M Renz; Karl-Heinz Herrmann; Martin Kraemer; Joachim Boettcher; Matthias Waginger; Paul-Christian Krueger; Alexander Pfeil; Florian Streitparth; Karim Kentouche; Bernd Gruhn; Jochen G Mainz; Martin Stenzel; Ulf K Teichgraeber; Juergen R Reichenbach; Hans-Joachim Mentzel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 7.  [Chest X-rays in children and adolescents : Indications and limitations].

Authors:  Diane Miriam Renz; Carolin Huisinga; Alexander Pfeil; Joachim Böttcher; Nicolaus Schwerk; Florian Streitparth; Jürgen Weidemann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 0.635

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.