Literature DB >> 26153495

BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations identify a new molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer at favorable prognosis.

C Cremolini1, M Di Bartolomeo2, A Amatu3, C Antoniotti1, R Moretto1, R Berenato2, F Perrone4, E Tamborini4, G Aprile5, S Lonardi6, A Sartore-Bianchi3, G Fontanini7, M Milione4, C Lauricella8, S Siena9, A Falcone1, F de Braud2, F Loupakis1, F Pietrantonio10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the negative prognostic role of BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is well established, the impact of BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations, occurring in <1% of CRCs, is completely unknown. The present work aims to describe clinical, pathological and molecular features and prognosis of BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutant mCRCs, compared with BRAF V600E mutant and wild-type ones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated for mCRC at three Italian Institutions between October 2006 and October 2014, with available KRAS and NRAS codon 12, 13, 59, 61, 117 and 146 and BRAF codon 594, 596 and 600 mutational status, as detected by means of direct sequencing or matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MassArray, were included.
RESULTS: Ten patients bearing BRAF codons 594 or 596 mutated tumors were identified and compared with 77 and 542 patients bearing BRAF V600E mutated and BRAF wild-type tumors, respectively. While BRAF V600E mutated tumors were more frequently right-sided, mucinous and with peritoneal spread, BRAF 594 or 596 mutated were more frequently rectal, nonmucinous and with no peritoneal spread. All BRAF 594 or 596 mutated tumors were microsatellite stable. Patients with BRAF codons 594 or 596 mutated tumors had markedly longer overall survival (OS) when compared with BRAF V600E mutated [median OS: 62.0 versus 12.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.64), P = 0.002], both at univariate and multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: BRAF codon 594 or 596 mutated mCRCs are different from BRAF V600E ones in terms of molecular features, pathological characteristics and clinical outcome. This is consistent with preclinical evidences of a kinase inactivating effect of these mutations. The role of CRAF in transducing the intracellular signal downstream BRAF 594 or 596 mutated proteins opens the way to further preclinical investigation.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; codons 594 and 596; colorectal cancer; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26153495     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  53 in total

Review 1.  BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

Authors:  Romain Cohen; Pascale Cervera; Magali Svrcek; Anna Pellat; Chantal Dreyer; Aimery de Gramont; Thierry André
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Right Versus Left Colon Cancer: Resectable and Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Michele Ghidini; Fausto Petrelli; Gianluca Tomasello
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Association of BRAF Mutations With Survival and Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Margonis; Stefan Buettner; Nikolaos Andreatos; Yuhree Kim; Doris Wagner; Kazunari Sasaki; Andrea Beer; Christoph Schwarz; Inger Marie Løes; Maria Smolle; Carsten Kamphues; Jin He; Timothy M Pawlik; Klaus Kaczirek; George Poultsides; Per Eystein Lønning; John L Cameron; Richard A Burkhart; Armin Gerger; Federico N Aucejo; Martin E Kreis; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Applying Precision to the Management of BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Benny Johnson; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  Non-V600 BRAF Mutations Define a Clinically Distinct Molecular Subtype of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy C Jones; Lindsay A Renfro; Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Alexa B Schrock; Andrew Rankin; Ben Y Zhang; Pashtoon M Kasi; Jesse S Voss; Alexis D Leal; James Sun; Jeffrey Ross; Siraj M Ali; Joleen M Hubbard; Benjamin R Kipp; Robert R McWilliams; Scott Kopetz; Robert A Wolff; Axel Grothey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  BRAF Mutation Testing and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Community Setting: Is There an Urgent Need for More Education?

Authors:  Timothy J Price; Carol Beeke; Amanda Rose Townsend; Louisa Lo; Roy Amitesh; Robert Padbury; David Roder; Guy Maddern; James Moore; Christos Karapetis
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 7.  Gene mutation and surgical technique: Suggestion or more?

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Heather A Lillemoe; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 8.  Omics analyses in peritoneal metastasis-utility in the management of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a narrative review.

Authors:  Christin Lund-Andersen; Annette Torgunrud; Karianne Giller Fleten; Kjersti Flatmark
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

Review 9.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer anti-EGFR therapy.

Authors:  Cristiana Lo Nigro; Vincenzo Ricci; Daniela Vivenza; Cristina Granetto; Teresa Fabozzi; Emanuela Miraglio; Marco C Merlano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marta Schirripa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.