Literature DB >> 26153298

Binding Rate Constants Reveal Distinct Features of Disordered Protein Domains.

Jakob Dogan1, Josefin Jonasson1, Eva Andersson1, Per Jemth1.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are abundant in the proteome and involved in key cellular functions. However, experimental data about the binding kinetics of IDPs as a function of different environmental conditions are scarce. We have performed an extensive characterization of the ionic strength dependence of the interaction between the molten globular nuclear co-activator binding domain (NCBD) of CREB binding protein and five different protein ligands, including the intrinsically disordered activation domain of p160 transcriptional co-activators (SRC1, TIF2, ACTR), the p53 transactivation domain, and the folded pointed domain (PNT) of transcription factor ETS-2. Direct comparisons of the binding rate constants under identical conditions show that the association rate constant, kon, for interactions between NCBD and disordered protein domains is high at low salt concentrations (90-350 × 10(6) M(-1) s(-1) at 4 °C) but is reduced significantly (10-30-fold) with an increasing ionic strength and reaches a plateau around physiological ionic strength. In contrast, the kon for the interaction between NCBD and the folded PNT domain is only 7 × 10(6) M(-1) s(-1) (4 °C and low salt) and displays weak ionic strength dependence, which could reflect a distinctly different association that relies less on electrostatic interactions. Furthermore, the basal rate constant (in the absence of electrostatic interactions) is high for the NCBD interactions, exceeding those typically observed for folded proteins. One likely interpretation is that disordered proteins have a large number of possible collisions leading to a productive on-pathway encounter complex, while folded proteins are more restricted in terms of orientation. Our results highlight the importance of electrostatic interactions in binding involving IDPs and emphasize the significance of including ionic strength as a factor in studies that compare the binding properties of IDPs to those of ordered proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26153298     DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  25 in total

1.  Disordered proteins follow diverse transition paths as they fold and bind to a partner.

Authors:  Jae-Yeol Kim; Hoi Sung Chung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Meng Gao; Junwen Xiong; Zhengding Su; Yongqi Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Kinetic Methods of Deducing Binding Mechanisms Involving Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Elin Karlsson; Per Jemth
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Charge Interactions Can Dominate Coupled Folding and Binding on the Ribosome.

Authors:  Jacopo Marino; Karin J Buholzer; Franziska Zosel; Daniel Nettels; Benjamin Schuler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The dock-and-coalesce mechanism for the association of a WASP disordered region with the Cdc42 GTPase.

Authors:  Li Ou; Megan Matthews; Xiaodong Pang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  GADIS: Algorithm for designing sequences to achieve target secondary structure profiles of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Tyler S Harmon; Michael D Crabtree; Sarah L Shammas; Ammon E Posey; Jane Clarke; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.650

7.  Affinity of IDPs to their targets is modulated by ion-specific changes in kinetics and residual structure.

Authors:  Basile I M Wicky; Sarah L Shammas; Jane Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantitative mapping of protein-peptide affinity landscapes using spectrally encoded beads.

Authors:  Jagoree Roy; Björn Harink; Nikhil P Damle; Huy Quoc Nguyen; Naomi R Latorraca; Brian C Baxter; Kara Brower; Scott A Longwell; Tanja Kortemme; Kurt S Thorn; Martha S Cyert; Polly Morrell Fordyce
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Disparate binding kinetics by an intrinsically disordered domain enables temporal regulation of transcriptional complex formation.

Authors:  Neil O Robertson; Ngaio C Smith; Athina Manakas; Mahiar Mahjoub; Gordon McDonald; Ann H Kwan; Jacqueline M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Coupled Binding and Helix Formation Monitored by Synchrotron-Radiation Circular Dichroism.

Authors:  Elin Karlsson; Eva Andersson; Nykola C Jones; Søren Vrønning Hoffmann; Per Jemth; Magnus Kjaergaard
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.