Literature DB >> 26151619

DNA fragmentation in brighter sperm predicts male fertility independently from age and semen parameters.

Monica Muratori1, Sara Marchiani2, Lara Tamburrino2, Marta Cambi2, Francesco Lotti2, Ilaria Natali3, Erminio Filimberti4, Ivo Noci2, Gianni Forti2, Mario Maggi2, Elisabetta Baldi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF), measured in brighter, dimmer, and total populations, predicts natural conception, and to evaluate the intra-individual variability of sDF.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Outpatient clinic and diagnostic laboratory. PATIENT(S): A total of 348 unselected patients and 86 proven fertile men. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): sDF was revealed with the use of terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL)/propidium iodide (PI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built before and after matching fertile men to patients for age (76:152) or semen parameters (68:136) or both (49:98). Intra-individual variability of sDF was assessed over 2 years. RESULT(S): Brighter (area under ROC curve [AUC] 0.718 ± 0.54), dimmer (AUC 0.655 ± 0.63), and total (AUC 0.757 ± 0.54) sDF predict male fertility in unmatched and age- or semen parameters-matched subjects. After matching for both age and semen parameters, only brighter (AUC 0.711 ± 0.83) and total (AUC 0.675 ± 0.92) sDF predict male fertility. At high values of total sDF, brighter predicts natural conception better than total sDF. Intra-individual coefficients of variation of sDF were 9.2 ± 8.6% (n = 25), 12.9 ± 12.7% (n = 53), and 14.0 ± 12.6% (n = 70) over, respectively, 100-day and 1- and 2-year periods, appearing to be the most stable of the evaluated semen parameters. CONCLUSION(S): The predictive power of total sDF partially depends on age and semen parameters, whereas brighter sDF independently predicts natural conception. Therefore, brighter sDF is a fraction of sDF that adds new information to the routine semen analysis. At high levels of sDF, distinguishing the two sperm populations improves the predictive power of sDF. Overall, our results support the idea that TUNEL/PI can be of clinical usefulness in the male fertility workup.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sperm DNA fragmentation; TUNEL/PI; male fertility; natural conception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26151619     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Massive Weight Loss Obtained by Bariatric Surgery Affects Semen Quality in Morbid Male Obesity: a Preliminary Prospective Double-Armed Study.

Authors:  Jinous Samavat; Giulia Cantini; Francesco Lotti; Alessandra Di Franco; Lara Tamburrino; Selene Degl'Innocenti; Elisa Maseroli; Erminio Filimberti; Enrico Facchiano; Marcello Lucchese; Monica Muratori; Gianni Forti; Elisabetta Baldi; Mario Maggi; Michaela Luconi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Christian De Geyter; Ursula Gobrecht-Keller; Astrid Ahler; Manuel Fischer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we?

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 16.430

4.  TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation.

Authors:  Sofia C Ribeiro; Monica Muratori; Maria De Geyter; Christian De Geyter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Some relevant points on sperm DNA fragmentation tests.

Authors:  Monica Muratori; Elisabetta Baldi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

6.  DNA fragmentation in two cytometric sperm populations: relationship with clinical and ultrasound characteristics of the male genital tract.

Authors:  Francesco Lotti; Lara Tamburrino; Sara Marchiani; Elisa Maseroli; Pasquale Vitale; Gianni Forti; Monica Muratori; Mario Maggi; Elisabetta Baldi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Use of sperm DNA fragmentation test in ART setting: is it a promising diagnostic test?

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khalili; Azam Agha-Rahimi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility.

Authors:  Alessandro Ilacqua; Giulia Izzo; Gian Pietro Emerenziani; Carlo Baldari; Antonio Aversa
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 9.  Tracking research trends and hotspots in sperm DNA fragmentation testing for the evaluation of male infertility: a scientometric analysis.

Authors:  Saradha Baskaran; Ashok Agarwal; Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam; Renata Finelli; Kathy Amy Robert; Concetta Iovine; Peter Natesan Pushparaj; Luna Samanta; Avi Harlev; Ralf Henkel
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  DNA Fragmentation in Viable and Non-Viable Spermatozoa Discriminates Fertile and Subfertile Subjects with Similar Accuracy.

Authors:  Monica Muratori; Giulia Pellegrino; Giusi Mangone; Chiara Azzari; Francesco Lotti; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Luca Boni; Andrea Borini; Mario Maggi; Elisabetta Baldi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.