Derek J Roberts1, Niklas Bobrovitz, David A Zygun, Chad G Ball, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Peter D Faris, Henry T Stelfox. 1. From the Departments of Surgery and Community Health Sciences and the Regional Trauma Program (D.J.R.), University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (N.B.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom; Division of Critical Care Medicine (D.A.Z.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Surgery (C.G.B., A.W.K.) and Oncology (C.G.B.) and the Regional Trauma Program (C.G.B., A.W.K.), Alberta Health Sciences Research-Research Analytics (P.D.F.), and Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences (H.T.S.), University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Variation in the use of damage control (DC) surgery across trauma centers may partially be driven by uncertainty as to when the procedure is indicated. We sought to scope the literature on DC surgery and DC interventions, identify their reported indications, and examine the content and evidence upon which they are based. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (1950-February 14, 2014) and the grey literature for original and nonoriginal citations reporting indications for DC surgery or DC interventions in civilian trauma patients. RESULTS: Among 27,732 citations identified, we included 270 peer-reviewed articles in the scoping review. Of these, 156 (57.8%) represented original research, primarily (75.0%) cohort studies. The articles reported 1,099 indications for DC surgery and 418 indications for 15 different DC interventions. The majority of indications for DC interventions were for abdominal (56.5%) procedures, including therapeutic perihepatic packing (56.5%), temporary abdominal closure/open abdominal management (40.7%), and staged pancreaticoduodenectomy (2.8%). Most DC surgery indications were based on intraoperative findings (71.7%) and represented characteristics of the injured patient (94.5%), including their physiology (57.6%), injuries (38.9%), and/or the amount or type of resuscitation provided (14.3%). Others were dependent on characteristics of the treating surgeon (12.1%), the patient's physiologic response to trauma care (9.6%), and/or the trauma care environment (1.5%). Approximately half (49.5%) included a decision threshold (e.g., pH < X) and, while most (74.7%) were based on a single clinical finding/injury, 25.3% required the presence of multiple findings concurrently. Only 87 indications were evaluated in original research studies and only 9 by more than one study. CONCLUSION: The vast number, varying underlying content, and lack of original research relating to indications for DC suggests that substantial uncertainty exists around when the procedure is indicated and highlights the need to establish evidence-informed consensus indications.
BACKGROUND: Variation in the use of damage control (DC) surgery across trauma centers may partially be driven by uncertainty as to when the procedure is indicated. We sought to scope the literature on DC surgery and DC interventions, identify their reported indications, and examine the content and evidence upon which they are based. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (1950-February 14, 2014) and the grey literature for original and nonoriginal citations reporting indications for DC surgery or DC interventions in civilian traumapatients. RESULTS: Among 27,732 citations identified, we included 270 peer-reviewed articles in the scoping review. Of these, 156 (57.8%) represented original research, primarily (75.0%) cohort studies. The articles reported 1,099 indications for DC surgery and 418 indications for 15 different DC interventions. The majority of indications for DC interventions were for abdominal (56.5%) procedures, including therapeutic perihepatic packing (56.5%), temporary abdominal closure/open abdominal management (40.7%), and staged pancreaticoduodenectomy (2.8%). Most DC surgery indications were based on intraoperative findings (71.7%) and represented characteristics of the injured patient (94.5%), including their physiology (57.6%), injuries (38.9%), and/or the amount or type of resuscitation provided (14.3%). Others were dependent on characteristics of the treating surgeon (12.1%), the patient's physiologic response to trauma care (9.6%), and/or the trauma care environment (1.5%). Approximately half (49.5%) included a decision threshold (e.g., pH < X) and, while most (74.7%) were based on a single clinical finding/injury, 25.3% required the presence of multiple findings concurrently. Only 87 indications were evaluated in original research studies and only 9 by more than one study. CONCLUSION: The vast number, varying underlying content, and lack of original research relating to indications for DC suggests that substantial uncertainty exists around when the procedure is indicated and highlights the need to establish evidence-informed consensus indications.
Authors: John A Harvin; John P Sharpe; Martin A Croce; Michael D Goodman; Timothy A Pritts; Elizabeth D Dauer; Benjamin J Moran; Rachel D Rodriguez; Ben L Zarzaur; Laura A Kreiner; Jeffrey A Claridge; John B Holcomb Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Axel Franke; Dan Bieler; Benedikt Friemert; Robert Schwab; Erwin Kollig; Christoph Güsgen Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Federico Coccolini; Derek Roberts; Luca Ansaloni; Rao Ivatury; Emiliano Gamberini; Yoram Kluger; Ernest E Moore; Raul Coimbra; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Bruno M Pereira; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Massimo Sartelli; George Velmahos; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Ari Leppaniemi; Matti Tolonen; Joseph Galante; Tarek Razek; Ron Maier; Miklosh Bala; Boris Sakakushev; Vladimir Khokha; Manu Malbrain; Vanni Agnoletti; Andrew Peitzman; Zaza Demetrashvili; Michael Sugrue; Salomone Di Saverio; Ingo Martzi; Kjetil Soreide; Walter Biffl; Paula Ferrada; Neil Parry; Philippe Montravers; Rita Maria Melotti; Francesco Salvetti; Tino M Valetti; Thomas Scalea; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Jeffry L Kashuk; Martha Larrea; Juan Alberto Martinez Hernandez; Heng-Fu Lin; Mircea Chirica; Catherine Arvieux; Camilla Bing; Tal Horer; Belinda De Simone; Peter Masiakos; Viktor Reva; Nicola DeAngelis; Kaoru Kike; Zsolt J Balogh; Paola Fugazzola; Matteo Tomasoni; Rifat Latifi; Noel Naidoo; Dieter Weber; Lauri Handolin; Kenji Inaba; Andreas Hecker; Yuan Kuo-Ching; Carlos A Ordoñez; Sandro Rizoli; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Marc De Moya; Imtiaz Wani; Alain Chichom Mefire; Ken Boffard; Lena Napolitano; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Tarik Madani; El Mehdi El Alouani; Younes Mhammdi; Mohammed Kharmaz; Mohamed El Ouadghiri; Abdou Lahlou; Lamrani Moulay Omar; Ahmed El Bardouni; Mustapha Mahfoud; Mohamed Saleh Berrada Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2017-06-15